• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Geneva Study Finds ‘Evergreening’ Increases Healthcare Costs

12/06/2013 by Intellectual Property Watch 2 Comments

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

By Brittany Ngo for Intellectual Property Watch

A recent Geneva-based study found that so-called evergreening practices utilised by drug manufacturers are successful in protecting profits by maintaining company market share and offsetting generic competition and cost containment policies.

The term “evergreening” refers to a strategy employed by pharmaceutical companies to extend their market monopoly by slightly changing the formulation of their brand drugs and obtaining new patents for “follow on” drugs. The purpose of the study was to assess the impact of such follow-on drugs on overall health care costs in the Swiss canton of Geneva.

The study, led Nathalie Vernaz from the Geneva University Hospitals, used hospital and community pharmacy invoice data in Geneva to calculate utilisation of eight follow-on drugs between 2000 and 2008. The researchers found that the number of patients receiving either an original brand or follow-on drug increased by 74,507 patients between 2001 and 2008. Of the total cost for all studied drugs (€171.5 million euros), more than €100 million euros was spent on brand-name drugs, €41.1 million euros for follow-on drugs, and €27.2 million euros for generic drugs.

Based on these results, the authors concluded that evergreening strategies for follow-on drugs contribute to overall healthcare costs. It also implies that policies that encourage prescription of generic drugs could induce saving on healthcare expenditure. The authors of the study urged healthcare providers and policymakers to be aware of the impact of evergreening strategies on overall healthcare costs.

The study, published in PLOS Medicine, is available here.

Brittany Ngo is currently completing her Master’s in Health Policy and Global Health at the Yale School of Public Health and previously obtained a Bachelor’s of Arts in Economics from Georgetown University. Through her studies she has developed an interest in health-related intellectual property issues. She is a summer intern at Intellectual Property Watch.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Creative Commons License"Geneva Study Finds ‘Evergreening’ Increases Healthcare Costs" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP-Watch Briefs, IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, English, Europe, Health & IP, Innovation/ R&D, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, WHO

Comments

  1. R Saha says

    04/02/2015 at 7:29 pm

    The term evergreening has also been used by many to indicate that a patent’s life can be extended for many years beyond its legal life which is devoid of rationality associated with principles of IPR stipulated in TRIPS. A 20 years term of a patent finishes after 20 years from the date of filing. If this was not the case, generic drugs would have disappeared. Perhaps extension of patent term was possible in earlier days when the patent term was linked to date of grant by delaying grant of a patent. IPR professional should be careful while linking the term evergreening with patents.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Balancing IPR with Public Health Interest: Brickbats, Power Play and Bouquets | PILMAN says:
    01/07/2013 at 2:11 am

    […] terminology ‘evergreening‘ usually ‘refers to a strategy employed by many pharmaceutical companies to extend […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.