Comparison Of US, EU Treaties Highlights Differences On ISP Liability 25/03/2013 by Intellectual Property Watch Leave a Comment Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)Click to print (Opens in new window)Following the announcement that the United States and European Union will negotiate a free trade agreement, a comparison of recent US and EU treaties shows differences in their treatment of intellectual property. The comparison evaluated language between two of the most substantive and recent free trade agreements adopted by the US and the EU for one controversial area of IP: liability for internet service providers (ISP) for infringing content. The comparison was done by infojustice.org, a blog of the Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property at American University Washington College of Law. The side-by-side comparison can be found here. Background on the EU-US announcement can be found here: (IPW, Bilateral/Regional Negotiations, 4 February 2013). Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)Click to print (Opens in new window) Related "Comparison Of US, EU Treaties Highlights Differences On ISP Liability" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.