• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Swiss Perspectives On The Success Of Its National Innovation Model

11/03/2013 by Tiphaine Nunzia Caulier for Intellectual Property Watch Leave a Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Swiss innovation is internationally recognised for its high quality, and the reasons may derive from its fiscal system, labour market, research and development (R&D) model and education policy, a senior Swiss official has said.

Swiss Secretary of State Mauro Dell’Ambrogio, who is in charge of educational training, research and innovation, spoke about the issue at a press conference in Geneva on 5 March.

Relying on a report from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), according to which “Switzerland’s innovation performance is among the best in the world,” he developed what he thinks are reasons for this success.

In addition to the favourable fiscal system and the regulation of the labour market in Switzerland, he offered the Swiss approach to R&D and academic policy choices in the country as explanations for its success in innovation.

He put forward the particularity of the Swiss R&D model, which relies for the major part on the involvement of the private sector. Some two-thirds of R&D in Switzerland is carried out by companies like those in the pharmaceutical sector, but also small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). This rate of involvement of the private sector – both large companies and SMEs – is among the highest in the world.

He took the example of the energy research area. There, 200 million Swiss francs are invested by the federal government, while the private sector invests each year 800 million Swiss francs.

For Dell’Ambrogio, the second characteristic of the Swiss R&D model is that Swiss companies massively invest in R&D abroad. He gave the example of the research centres of Swiss companies located in foreign countries, like Novartis in California, Roche in Singapore and Shanghai, and Nestlé in Brazil.

According to Dell’Ambrogio, the role the federal government plays while investing in higher education and research is also crucial.

He explained that there is a dichotomy of responsibilities in education in Switzerland. Both the cantons – i.e., the federated Swiss provinces – and the federal government deal with education. However, the federal government is only financing high-profile research and the most prestigious universities, mainly the ones training engineers like the Swiss federal institutes of technology based in Lausanne and Zurich. He highlighted that a third of the Swiss government funding is allocated to the training of engineers and students working in the area of technologies.

Dell’Ambrogio said this government strategy highlights the importance of scientific and academic research for the economic development of a region. He gave the example of the chemical industry and said that the federal institutes of technologies were the reason of the success of this industry which then strongly contributed to the economic development of the country.

Finally, the Secretary of State described the international character of research in Switzerland, a country where much research is carried out partially or integrally by foreigners (like at the European Organization for Nuclear Research, CERN). He also reminded the audience of the main partners of Switzerland in the area of education, like the European Union and North American countries, and described the quest for new partnerships with emerging countries in the area of education.

Tiphaine Nunzia Caulier recently graduated with a Master in International Law from the Graduate Institute in Geneva and UCLA School of Law. Through her work experience and academic interests she has specialised in international trade, intellectual property, and public health.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Tiphaine Nunzia Caulier may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"Swiss Perspectives On The Success Of Its National Innovation Model" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: Features, IP Policies, Language, Subscribers, Themes, Venues, English, Europe, Finance, Health & IP, Innovation/ R&D, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.