• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Governments’ Early Warning Notes Issued On New Internet Domains

21/11/2012 by Monika Ermert for Intellectual Property Watch 1 Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

No exclusive “.baby” top-level domain (TLD) for Johnson and Johnson, no exclusive “.blog” for Google, nor “.antivir” for Symantec or “.epost” for the German Postal Service. Of 242 government early warning notices to applicants for new generic top-level domains posted last night by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), the majority target “quasi-monopolies” over generic names or lack of protective measures with regard to defensive registrations.

The list of early warnings is here.

Australia’s Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy (DBCDE) clearly took the lead, filing over 130 warning notes, and applicants with large bundles of generic TLD applications like Amazon got served a significant portion of the letters.

Early warnings have been included under pressure from ICANN’s Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) on the new TLD application process started this spring by ICANN, the private net governance body located in Marina del Rey, California, in an effort to open up the domain name space for new generic TLDs like .com, .org. or .info.

Applicants can follow up the early warning notices with changes to their applications to address the governments’ concerns. They can also, if moving quickly, withdraw their applications and save 80 percent of the US$180,000 application fee. Or they can go forward and risk getting blocked by an official objection later in the process. The list of all applications is here.

Very much expected were a number of early warning notices on TLDs with geographic names, like .patagonia, a company filing that got an early warning from Argentina, Swiss Airlines (warned by Switzerland) or Delta Airlines (warned by Nigeria). India intervened on .islam pointing to its own muslim community. The United States, India and Australia alike were not amused with applications for .army, .navy or .airforce from a US company.

The much-debated DotConnectAfrica application for .africa was served early warnings from more than a dozen African countries who all said it tried to compete with the .africa bid officially supported by the African Union and many of its member states. Notably no objection has been filed for the TLD .gay, and only .sucks got an early warning that can be understood as related in part to “public morale”. Yet in some of the early warnings governments went very far in describing what kind of registration policy they would like to see or what jurisdiction they would prefer for a certain TLD.

ICANN has started to sort through the nearly 2000 applications,having external evaluators check the technical and financial soundness of the applications. The organisationm which just lost Kurt Pritz, vice president in charge of the TLD issues – Mr. TLD, as he might be called – due to a conflict of interest, has just announced it will on 17th December hold the draw to decide whose applications will be processed first. More objections from governments, as well as from other parties, and also “GAC advice” will have to be handled by the gTLD applicants in spring of next year.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Monika Ermert may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"Governments’ Early Warning Notes Issued On New Internet Domains" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, Access to Knowledge/ Education, Copyright Policy, English, ITU/ICANN, Information and Communications Technology/ Broadcasting, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains

Trackbacks

  1. Government advisory agency files domain name protests – ZDNet « DomainUSA – USA Domain Names from ConsultUSA says:
    21/11/2012 at 11:16 pm

    […] panelBBC NewsSouth American Governments Dispute Amazon Domain ApplicationTechWeekEurope UKIntellectual Property Watch -Telegraph.co.uk -ITProPortalall 40 news […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.