• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

ITU Cautious On Transparency Of New Telecom Regulations

16/07/2012 by Intellectual Property Watch Leave a Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

By Monika Ermert for Intellectual Property Watch

The UN International Telecommunication Union will publish the draft document for the future International Telecommunication Regulations (ITRs) and open a website for public comments on the much-debated document. But some hoped for more. [Update: the draft ITRs are now posted here.]

The decision was made at a meeting of the ITU Council, the highest decision-making body in the ITU between the plenipotentiary conferences that take place every four years. The 1988 ITRs, according to the ITU the only international treaty on telecommunication, will be updated at a diplomatic conference in December, the World Conference on International Telecommunication (WCIT), in Dubai.

While the ITU named the publication of the draft ITR document, the so-called TD64, a landmark decision by the ITU Council, there were much more ambitious proposals with regard to making the WCIT process and ITU work in general more transparent.

Swedish Councillor Anders Jonsson told Intellectual Property Watch that his delegation was “not happy.” Sweden had favoured allowing the publication of all WCIT contributions, as well as individual country proposals, at least where countries clearly agreed with the publication.

Member states from all regions, according to Jonsson, had supported a bolder move with at least the publication of summary documents that included references to the country contributions. TD64, moreover, has been leaked already for some time now.

Yet several states, including WCIT host United Arab Emirates, China, Russia and Saudi Arabia, blocked such proposals. As the new ITRs are expected to cover policies for the converging networks with some member states pushing also for cybersecurity measures or possibilities to intervene in the routing of traffic, a broad discussion has started warning against potential attempt to regulate the Internet.

ITU Secretary General Hamadoun Touré – in addition to the public consultation website opened by the ITU on TD64 – encouraged further national and regional consultations, as have been held or announced, for example, by the Netherlands, and Kenya and the African region.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Creative Commons License"ITU Cautious On Transparency Of New Telecom Regulations" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP-Watch Briefs, IP Policies, Themes, Venues, Access to Knowledge/ Education, English, Information and Communications Technology/ Broadcasting, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains, United Nations - other

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.