• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

“Landmark” Global Commission On HIV And Law Report Tough On IP System

09/07/2012 by William New, Intellectual Property Watch 1 Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

An independent, UN-led multistakeholder group today issued strong recommendations on ways to improve ongoing global efforts to address HIV/AIDS. Among them – serious questions about the current intellectual property rights system.

The Global Commission on HIV and the Law issued its potentially high-impact report today, available here.

In chapter 6 on IP rights, it takes aim at numerous big questions of the day, such as counterfeiting, enforcement, drug pricing, innovation, free trade agreements, and use of flexibilities under the World Trade Organization Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS).

The report presents evidence in charts and graphs calling into doubt the effectiveness for HIV treatment of the current IP system. In particular, a chart shows that in the United States government approval of new molecular entities shot up the year after TRIPS went into effect (1995) but long since returned to pre-TRIPS levels or below. And innovation in developed countries often is for cosmetic drugs rather than life-saving ones, it said.

“TRIPS was meant to strike a balance between the rights of innovators and the rights of consumers,” the report states. “In reality, the balance has tipped dangerously in favour of the rights holders.”

The report links high prices from patents to deaths of people who cannot access the treatments they need.

It says pharmaceutical companies do not get the credit for lower prices on some drugs in recent years. “While some pharmaceutical companies have entered into agreements to off er medicines at reduced prices, their actions cannot be credited for the dramatic rise in treatment,” the report said. “Rather, AIDS treatment activists coordinated international campaigns to boost domestic and donor funding. This, coupled with competition from generic manufacturers like Cipla’s ‘game-changing’ offer to provide triple combination treatment for less than a dollar a day in 2001, greatly increased treatment coverage.”

It also says trade agreements are making drugs less accessible to developing countries that sign them. “[R]ecent bilateral and multilateral trade agreements … have undoubtedly increased the power of pharmaceutical patent holders to control the prices of drugs on global markets,” it said. “Governments, especially in low- and middle-income countries, cannot afford them.”

The commission was convened by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) on behalf of the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), and chaired by former Brazilian President Fernando Henrique Cardoso.

UNDP Administrator Helen Clark gave a speech today on the report.

The Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network issued a statement, here, welcoming the many “strong” recommendations of the commission.

The Canadian group said: “Decriminalize drugs for personal use. Repeal laws that criminalize sex work. Implement comprehensive harm reduction services in prisons. Ensure access to health services for migrants. Fully enforce measures to end violence against women and ensure access to comprehensive sexual and reproductive health services. Create simple mechanisms for access to lower-cost, generic medicines and adopt a global moratorium on international trade agreements that would limit such access. These are just a few of the strong recommendations in a powerful global overview released today by the Global Commission on HIV and the Law.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"“Landmark” Global Commission On HIV And Law Report Tough On IP System" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, English, Health & IP, Innovation/ R&D, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, United Nations - other

Trackbacks

  1. At WTO, Health Advocates See Benefit From TRIPS, Urge Waiver For LDCs says:
    07/10/2015 at 3:26 pm

    […] She cited the Global Commission on HIV and the Law, chaired by the UN Development Programme (UNEP), and said the commission had delivered specific recommendations on IP and HIV. Some of those recommendations are visionary and need to be taken seriously, she said (IPW, Public Health, 9 July 2015). […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.