• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

‘Counterfeit’ Dropped From New WHO Protocol On Illicit Tobacco Trade

04/04/2012 by William New, Intellectual Property Watch 1 Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

A new treaty protocol against illicit trade in tobacco products struck today at the World Health Organization saw a late-stage decision to strip out references to “counterfeit” products from the text, according to sources.

Negotiators in the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body on a Protocol on Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products not only removed all references to counterfeit, they said, but added a preambular paragraph that states:

“Considering that this Protocol does not seek to address issues concerning intellectual property rights”

“Counterfeit has an intellectual property meaning,” said Jonathan Liberman of Australia, director of the McCabe Centre for Law and Cancer, and a member of the Union for International Cancer Control, who was at the negotiation in Geneva. Removing ‘counterfeit’ “was an acknowledgement that the [protocol] should not be concerned with tobacco industry trademarks. It should be concerned with whether taxes are paid on tobacco products,” which contributes toward public health objectives.

“Protection of trademarks are of no relevance to a public health body,” Liberman told Intellectual Property Watch. Liberman published some updates during the week in the non-governmental Framework Convention Alliance Bulletin, available here.

There is one more hurdle for the new protocol, as it must be approved by the Conference of Parties, which will meet in November in Seoul, South Korea. But that may end up being a formality after these negotiations finished the job.

The latest text of the protocol will not be posted until 11 May, according to a WHO spokesperson. Documents from the outset of the 29 March to 4 April negotiation are here.

References to counterfeit included linkages to illicit manufacturing, among other things.

A reason for the deletion of references to counterfeit appears to have been related to the disagreement among WHO members over the definition of counterfeit. WHO members are working toward an agreement on a mechanism to address what they call “substandard/spurious/falsely-labelled/falsified/counterfeit medical products” (IPW, WHO, 28 January 2012). In that context, they also have agreed to remove intellectual property rights considerations.

The protocol took four years (with five sessions and numerous intersessional meetings) to negotiate and involved the participation of 135 countries, WHO said in a release. It will take effect when 40 members have ratified it.

“This is a historic moment for global tobacco-control efforts, as this is the first protocol under the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC)”, said Ian Walton-George, chairman of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body. “By agreeing to this Protocol, governments have reiterated their commitment to protect public health and tackle illicit trade in tobacco products.”

According to the WHO, the protocol sets rules for stopping illicit trade in tobacco products through control of the supply chain. It also establishes terms for unlawful conduct, and measures for enforcement and international cooperation.

“Under the Protocol,” WHO said, “the Parties propose to establish a global tracking and tracing system for tobacco products and reached agreement on other measures, such as licensing, liability, enforcement, information-sharing and mutual legal assistance. These measures are designed to counteract and eventually eliminate the illicit trade in tobacco products.”

Illicit trade makes tobacco products more accessible and affordable, which contributes to the spread of the tobacco epidemic, WHO said. It also harms national economies and government policies, it said.

The WHO Framework Convention secretariat will serve as the secretariat for the protocol. The convention was adopted by the annual World Health Assembly in May 2003 and entered into force in February 2005.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"‘Counterfeit’ Dropped From New WHO Protocol On Illicit Tobacco Trade" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, Copyright Policy, Enforcement, English, Health & IP, Human Rights, IP Law, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains, WHO

Trackbacks

  1. Tobaksbeskattning i EU « ameliaandersdotter.eu says:
    24/07/2012 at 10:40 pm

    […] jag ställde frågan till att börja med var en rapport från Världshälsoorganisationen om att varumärkesförfalskning exkluderats från organisationens nya avtal om tobak och hälsa. Anledningen var en önskan om att […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.