• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

At WTO, US Takes A Jab At India’s IP Trade Policy

15/09/2011 by William New, Intellectual Property Watch 4 Comments

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

The United States today took a swipe at India’s intellectual property rights policies and enforcement, asserting that it is out of sync with international practices but stopping short of suggesting that its 2005 IP law is out of compliance with World Trade Organization rules.

India passed a major IP law in 2005 as required to comply with the 1994 WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). WTO allows members some room to decide how they implement agreements most appropriately for their national conditions, but India’s law has been critiqued by developed countries and their industries for several provisions. However, no government has directly challenged India’s law. Instead, they offer pressure such as the US did today.

Despite the law being relatively new (India amended its patent law in 2005)[corrected], US Ambassador to the WTO Michael Punke attributed India’s success to IP rights and said it would not reach its goals without strengthening and enforcing them.

“India’s highly successful creative and innovative industries depend greatly on the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights,” he said in his statement to the 14 September trade policy review of India. “These rights are also prerequisites to the development of a value-added manufacturing sector that India seeks to establish. India’s IP policies and enforcement, unfortunately, do not reflect this imperative.”

Punke urged India to make more changes to its laws. “Although India has long been considering legislative and other initiatives to update some of its IP policies, including the Copyright Bill currently before Parliament,” he said, “those efforts tend to fall well short of international best practices in these areas.”

He did not suggest that India is out of compliance with WTO rules, however.

The WTO Trade Policy Review of India is taking place on 14 and 16 September. The WTO report and a report from India are here.

The WTO report said India has taken numerous steps since its last review, but said data is hard to collect because it is still left up to the states.

[Update] The United States was not alone in pointing to IP rights issues. According to the trade policy review panel chair’s closing report [pdf]:

“Intellectual property: Noting the actions undertaken to strengthen the enforcement of intellectual property rights, including through administrative and legal reforms, Members urged India to continue stepping up efforts in this area, which remained a source of particular concern.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"At WTO, US Takes A Jab At India’s IP Trade Policy" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, News, Copyright Policy, English, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains

Comments

  1. Kamakhya says

    15/09/2011 at 7:40 am

    Dear Sir,
    It is wrong to write that – India did not have a Patent Law before 2005.

    The History of Indian Patent System is as follows
    1856 –
    THE ACT VI OF 1856 ON PROTECTION OF INVENTIONS BASED ON THE BRITISH PATENT LAW OF 1852. CERTAIN EXCLUSIVE PRIVILEGES GRANTED TO INVENTORS OF NEW MANUFACTURERS FOR A PERIOD OF 14 YEARS.
    1859 –
    THE ACT MODIFIED AS ACT XV; PATENT MONOPOLIES CALLED EXCLUSIVE PRIVILEGES (MAKING. SELLING AND USING INVENTIONS IN INDIA AND AUTHORIZING OTHERS TO DO SO FOR 14 YEARS FROM DATE OF FILING SPECIFICATION).
    1872 –
    THE PATENTS & DESIGNS PROTECTION ACT.
    1883 –
    THE PROTECTION OF INVENTIONS ACT.
    1888 –
    CONSOLIDATED AS THE INVENTIONS & DESIGNS ACT.
    1911 –
    THE INDIAN PATENTS & DESIGNS ACT.
    1972 –
    THE PATENTS ACT (ACT 39 OF 1970) CAME INTO FORCE ON 20TH APRIL 1972.
    1999 –
    ON MARCH 26, 1999 PATENTS (AMENDMENT) ACT, (1999) CAME INTO FORCE FROM 01-01-1995.
    2002 –
    THE PATENTS (AMENDMENT) ACT 2002 CAME INTO FORCE FROM 2OTH MAY 2003
    2005 –
    THE PATENTS (AMENDMENT) ACT 2005 EFFECTIVE FROM Ist JANUARY 2005

    In 2005 the Patents Act 1972 was amended for the third time to bring in product patent regime in chemicals and drugs, thereby to comply with the TRIPS.

    Please visit the site http://www.ipindia.nic.in
    Regards

    Reply
  2. William New says

    15/09/2011 at 10:32 pm

    Kamakhya – thanks for the clarification.

    Reply
  3. rucha says

    16/09/2011 at 2:25 am

    its not that india didnt had patent law but just that it was not in compliance with TRIPS so it was amended.. but developed countries seek for TRIPS PLUS like protection in addition ti trips…but they can not force it on other nations as minimum standards put forth by TRIPS are met.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Trade And Access To Medicines: Things The WTO Should Consider | Intellectual Property Watch says:
    14/10/2011 at 4:36 pm

    […] the US and other developing and developed countries. This concern seemingly harmonizes with a swipe taken by the US rep on 14 September at the WTO trade policy review of India, maintaining that India’s IP trade policy […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.