• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

UN Body Addresses Problems With IP Rights Within Europe

08/07/2011 by Intellectual Property Watch 3 Comments

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) is holding a somewhat uncharacteristic two-day meeting to increase awareness of intellectual property rights throughout the region.

The UNECE meeting of IP “specialists” is taking place on 7-8 July at the UN in Geneva. According to a UNECE newsletter [pdf], the meeting includes a wide range of stakeholders, including industry, but no one representing the public interest.

“An effective and balanced intellectual property (IP) regime increases national wealth and benefits consumers by stimulating research and investment into new technologies and innovative products, and by enabling the transfer of technology, including between countries at different stages of economic development,” the newsletter said.

The problem in the UNECE region, it said, is that smaller companies are not aware of the benefits of IP, university researchers do not realise that research results need IP protection to be commercialised, and “consumers do not fully understand how, by buying counterfeit products, they are undermining innovative businesses.”

The newsletter stretches a bit to offer a rationale for the UN body to hold such an event: “This event contributes to the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals, in particular Goal 8
“Develop a global partnership for development”, which, inter alia, calls for the United Nations to work in cooperation with the private sector to make available the benefits of new technologies.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Creative Commons License"UN Body Addresses Problems With IP Rights Within Europe" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP-Watch Briefs, IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, Copyright Policy, English, Europe, Innovation/ R&D, Lobbying, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains

Comments

  1. Ralph Heinrih says

    08/07/2011 at 6:34 pm

    Dear Madam or Sir,

    To be precise, the meeting did not include any self-appointed advocates of the public interest. It did however include representatives of governments, which I am sure you agree are elected to serve the public interest.

    Best regards
    Ralph Heinrich

    (organizer of the meeting in question)

    Reply
  2. Christopher Paun says

    09/07/2011 at 12:35 pm

    First of all, thank you for covering the UNECE meeting. I think many people are not aware of the UNECE’s work in the area of IP. However, I do not understand why you describe the meeting as “uncharacteristic”. What is the reference here? Are you comparing it to WIPO ACE meetings or to WCO RHCG meetings? The UNECE Team of Specialists on IP exists since 2006 and before that they had the Advisory Group on IPRs. In what way was this year’s meeting uncharacteristic? Was there any new development? If so, I would like to read such news.

    Reply
  3. William New says

    12/07/2011 at 6:00 pm

    Thanks Christopher, “uncharacteristic” means it was an uncommon activity for a group more often involved in issues such as transportation or energy. It was not to say they have never been involved in it before. There may well have been news in the way the issue was handled there.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.