Mexican Senate Urges Rejection Of ACTA 23/06/2011 by Intellectual Property Watch 1 Comment Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)Click to print (Opens in new window)The Mexican Senate this week approved a resolution rejecting the secretly negotiated Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, according to sources, citing absence of inclusion in the negotiations, potential negative impact on internet users’ access to knowledge, freedom of expression and other concerns. [Update: the Senate Gazeta is available here [pdf] ] The resolution (in Spanish) is here. It calls on the Mexican government not to sign the agreement but does not represent a binding rejection. ACTA was negotiated by Mexico and a league of rights-holding developed nations (and Morocco) without the involvement of parliamentary bodies. The agreement, which aims to curb widespread counterfeiting and piracy among signatory nations and potentially additional future signatories, recently opened for signatures (IPW, IP Live, 27 May 2011). The Mexican action and other developments led the American University Information Justice programme to suggest that ACTA might only be “soft” law after all, as it does not have parliamentary approval in any country. La Quadrature du Net release on Senate passage is here. The website ALT1040 has a report on the event (In Spanish) here. Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)Click to print (Opens in new window) Related "Mexican Senate Urges Rejection Of ACTA" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Dr. Josh Mandelbaum says 24/06/2011 at 12:18 am Counterfeiting and piracy are major industries in Mexico. How could you expect them to act against infringement and counterfeiting? Reply