• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Would Canada-EU Trade Proposals Add $2.8 Billion Price Tag To Drugs Bill?

08/02/2011 by Intellectual Property Watch 1 Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

By Tavengwa Runyowa for Intellectual Property Watch

A study by the Canadian Generic Pharmaceuticals Association (CGPA) suggests that the European Union’s (EU) proposed changes to Canada’s patent system could add nearly $3 billion to Canada’s prescription drug bill.

The EU tabled the proposals during the ongoing negotiations for a comprehensive trade agreement. If implemented, they could extend the market exclusivity of brand name drugs in Canada by up to 3.5 years, thus delaying the entry of cheaper generics into the market.

According to the CGPA, the implementation of these proposals would make Canada’s protection regime for innovative drugs the most extensive of all countries in the world. The price increases would be born by government drug plans, which pay for about 45 percent of total prescription drug costs in Canada.

The CGPA also argues that by extending market exclusivity, the additional cost to Canadians would be disproportionately greater than the expected increases in pharmaceutical R&D investment.

Jim Keon, the president of the CGPA, pointed out that the EU exports about $5 billion worth of pharmaceuticals to Canada each year. This figure represents approximately 16.5 percent of the EU’s total exports to Canada.

Full press release here.

Meanwhile, the Globe and Mail newspaper ran a story saying that there is “new life” in an access to medicines bill, C-393, as a result of rare cooperation. The bill is aimed at encouraging exports of medicines to the world’s poorest countries.

[Tavengwa Runyowa was an intern at Intellectual Property Watch from January to March 2011.]

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Creative Commons License"Would Canada-EU Trade Proposals Add $2.8 Billion Price Tag To Drugs Bill?" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP-Watch Briefs, Language, English

Trackbacks

  1. JSS – Amending Canada’s Access To Medicines Regime (CAMR): The New Fate Of Bill C-393 (Canada) says:
    29/06/2011 at 10:22 am

    […] Would Canada-EU Trade Proposals Add $2.8 Billion Price Tag To Drugs Bill? […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.