• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Microsoft General Counsel On Pricing For The Poor, Cloud Computing

01/02/2011 by Catherine Saez, Intellectual Property Watch Leave a Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

A top official of the Microsoft Corporation paid a visit to his former school in Geneva yesterday on his way from the World Economic Forum, and talked about corporate responsibility, the company’s principles, infringement issues and cloud computing. He also tried to explain the company’s complex differential pricing regime aimed at lowering prices for lower income populations – especially if they don’t happen to speak a popular world language.

Brad Smith, senior vice president and general counsel of Microsoft and former alumni of the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, said that Microsoft was aiming to be a “good corporate citizen,” through its programmes and principles. He also said the company was facing a large piracy problem as “not everybody pays for the products,” and it was trying to convert users into paying customers.

Smith was asked how to reconcile intellectual property rights and corporate social responsibility. “Microsoft in its heart is an intellectual property company,” Smith said. If there were no intellectual property laws, anybody could copy instantaneously without concern, which he sees as problematic. “We would create those hopefully magnificent products and then see them yield no revenue,” he said.

The company goes into markets and builds legal framework with governments and try to educate the public about IP rules and the value of protecting them, he said adding that Microsoft has “quite elaborate IP efforts” across copyrights, patents, trademarks, and trade secrets protection. Some countries used to be referred to as “one disk country,” where after one disk was shipped, a second shipment was unnecessary.

“We hope and even expect that most people who get our products are going to pay for them,” Smith said but he added Microsoft recognised that not everybody has the same ability to pay. Differential pricing has been a long established practice and the company has been providing “deep” discounts to schools, educational institutions, “especially public education institutions,” with software at much lower price.

Microsoft also recognises that different countries have different income levels “so our pricing tends to reflect that” but “it is quite a complex field,” Smith said, in particular if the company is working in a country that is speaking a language that is widely spoken somewhere else.

For example, if the company wants to have a discounted price for Romanian language products, they are “pretty sure that this won’t be used outside of Romania.” However, if the language is English or Spanish, it makes it more difficult to provide differential pricing as it may create a market for people to go buy it in country where it is cheaper and re-import it into higher priced countries such as the United Kingdom or the United States, he said.

The Microsoft Principle

According to Smith, Microsoft has three areas of work: programmes, principles, and pragmatism. Programmes involve empowering people to use technology “to realise their potential,” he said, and balance interests of different stakeholders such as communities, customers, governments, and regulators. Smith presented Microsoft as being an early supporter of the United Nations Millennium Development Goals.

Establishing principles means dialoguing with others, Smith said. On pragmatism, “no matter how good a job is … bad things still happen,” he said, referring to allegations in September 2010 that Microsoft had a role in the Russian government abusing copyrights to clamp down on non-governmental organisations. Corporate social responsibility needs a human voice, Smith said. That was the strategy in the blog he posted describing the actions that were to be taken to address the issue. Microsoft accepted its responsibility and decided to create a new unilateral software licence for NGOs, and an NGO Legal Assistance Programme in Russia. “Companies need a conscience,” he said.

Smith also addressed cloud computing, which he described as running software remotely in data centres, saying it offers a lot of potential for NGOs, especially in crisis situations, such as natural disasters.

On 24 January, he gave a speech before the French National Assembly on cloud computing in the context of network security, and he described cloud computing as a promising new shift in the information technology world, with lower costs for the users and global economic benefits.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Catherine Saez may be reached at csaez@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"Microsoft General Counsel On Pricing For The Poor, Cloud Computing" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, News, Subscribers, Themes, Access to Knowledge/ Education, Copyright Policy, Enforcement, English, Information and Communications Technology/ Broadcasting, Innovation/ R&D, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.