• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Dawn Of WIPO Industrial Design Treaty Talks; Internet As Trademark Danger Zone

07/11/2010 by Catherine Saez, Intellectual Property Watch Leave a Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

World Intellectual Property Organization members this week took early steps toward the possibility of a treaty to facilitate the registration of industrial designs, and urged WIPO to continue addressing potential new challenges to trademarks from the impending expansion of domain names on the internet.

“WIPO is in a norm-setting mode right now,” said a participant.

The 24th session of the Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications met from 1-4 November.

The concept of an international instrument for industrial designs emerged earlier this year, and was reinforced at the annual WIPO General Assembly in September, in particular by the European Union. The treaty would be aimed at facilitating industrial design registration at national level.

A marked copy of the draft summary of the meeting by the chair is available here [pdf].

Industrial design refers to the aesthetic aspect of an item. This can be three-dimensional features, such as a shape or a surface, or two-dimensional features, such as patterns, lines or colours, according to WIPO’s website.

The treaty could set a “ceiling” of possible administrative requests to grant registration, a diplomat said. In some countries, industrial designs are covered under patent laws and in others under copyright laws, a source said (IPW, WIPO, 30 September 2010).

But there was some concern about setting a fixed list of documents related to registration, another source said.

Some countries are eager to set a target for negotiating a treaty on industrial design while others would like more information before moving into full negotiations.

For the meeting, WIPO provided draft provisions on industrial design law and practice [pdf]. During the meeting, delegations reviewed it, and some countries asked for clarifications. The WIPO secretariat was asked to prepare a revised text, taking into account comments from the 24th session, for consideration at the next session of the committee, tentatively from 28 March to 1 April 2011.

According to the draft summary by meeting Chair Adil el Mabiki of Morocco, “a number of delegations called for the convening of a diplomatic conference for the adoption of a treaty on industrial design registration formalities.” Late changes were made to the chair’s draft stating that some members want the diplomatic conference be held in the next biennium, 2012-2013, while others were of the view that further discussions were needed on the revised text before considering the diplomatic conference.

Trademarks and the Internet

The committee also addressed the issue of the protection of intellectual property rights in the context of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) project to expand the domain name system, introducing new generic top-level domains. The chair’s draft also cited that concerns were expressed by several delegations regarding an initiative at ICANN to review and possibly amend the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (IPW, Copyright Policy, 23 June 2010).

Protection of trademarks on the internet was also on the agenda of the meeting. The secretariat was asked to examine the Joint Recommendation Concerning Provisions on the Protection of Marks, and Other Industrial Property Rights in Signs on the Internet, adopted by member states in 2001, almost 10 years after its adoption, in the face of new challenges.

According to the document on trademarks and the internet [pdf] prepared by the secretariat, “Practices such as the unauthorized use of trademarks as keywords by search engine operators or within listings for non-genuine goods on auction sites, or the use of trademarks on virtual objects that are traded in virtual worlds, constitute clear challenges to the traditional application of trademark law.” According to the chair’s summary, WIPO should examine the joint recommendation to determine if new challenges were addressed in the 2001 text, and member states were asked to carry out a similar analysis.

Separately, ongoing concerns by some governments about the unauthorised use of country names were also raised during the meeting. The WIPO secretariat was asked to draft a document on the situation, a participant said.

William New contributed to this story.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Catherine Saez may be reached at csaez@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"Dawn Of WIPO Industrial Design Treaty Talks; Internet As Trademark Danger Zone" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Subscribers, Themes, Venues, English, ITU/ICANN, Information and Communications Technology/ Broadcasting, Innovation/ R&D, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains, WIPO

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.