• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Survey: US 19th In Global IP Protection

13/09/2009 by Intellectual Property Watch 7 Comments

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

The United States, often seen as toughest on other nations for their perceived failure to protect US intellectual property rights, was itself 19th [note: corrected from earlier version] in the world in such protection last year, according to the latest World Economic Forum survey on competitiveness. Some of those scoring higher have been criticised in the past year by the US for lax IP protection. Overall, the US was replaced by Switzerland as the most competitive country.

WEF report here [pdf]. Full IP protection list on page 347.

WEF press release here.

The US Chamber of Commerce industry group in a blog post said the low ranking is evidence of the need for stronger protection measures by the United States in the international context (rather than within its borders), saying the survey captures the perception of others of the US “stance” on IP protection.

The top 50 from the survey:

1.02 Intellectual property protection
How would you rate intellectual property protection, including anti-counterfeiting measures, in your country? (1 = very weak; 7 = very

strong) | 2008–2009 weighted average

RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY SCORE MEAN: 3.8
1 Singapore ………………………6.2
2 Sweden…………………………6.1
3 Finland…………………………..6.1
4 Switzerland ……………………6.1
5 Austria…………………………..6.1
6 Denmark ……………………….6.0
7 New Zealand………………….6.0
8 Luxembourg…………………..5.9
9 Netherlands……………………5.8
10 France …………………………..5.8
11 Puerto Rico ……………………5.8
12 Australia ………………………..5.8
13 Germany ……………………….5.7
14 Norway………………………….5.7
15 United Arab Emirates………5.6
16 Ireland …………………………..5.6
17 Iceland…………………………..5.5
18 Canada ………………………….5.5
19 United States …………………5.4
20 Japan…………………………….5.4
21 United Kingdom ……………..5.3
22 Belgium…………………………5.3
23 Hong Kong SAR……………..5.3
24 South Africa …………………..5.2
25 Bahrain ………………………….5.1
26 Oman ……………………………5.0
27 Taiwan, China…………………5.0
28 Barbados ……………………….4.9
29 Cyprus…………………………..4.7
30 Jordan …………………………..4.7
31 Saudi Arabia …………………..4.6
32 Namibia …………………………4.6
33 Portugal…………………………4.6
34 Estonia ………………………….4.6
35 Gambia, The…………………..4.6
36 Qatar …………………………….4.5
37 Malaysia ………………………..4.5
38 Slovenia…………………………4.5
39 Malta …………………………….4.4
40 Spain …………………………….4.3
41 Korea, Rep. ……………………4.2
42 Greece ………………………….4.1
43 Tunisia …………………………..4.0
44 Israel …………………………….4.0
45 China …………………………….4.0
46 Czech Republic ………………4.0
47 Kuwait …………………………..4.0
48 Mauritius ……………………….4.0
49 Botswana………………………3.9
50 Italy ………………………………3.9

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Creative Commons License"Survey: US 19th In Global IP Protection" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP-Watch Briefs, Language, English

Trackbacks

  1. Moved Temporarily says:
    15/09/2009 at 1:59 pm

    […] this year to Switzerland. So it goes. But tucked back in the report’s list of data tables was a fascinating one about intellectual property, and it put the US in 19th place worldwide when it comes to protecting […]

    Reply
  2. US Chamber of Commerce cites #19 rank, wants tougher IP laws | UpOff.com says:
    15/09/2009 at 2:00 pm

    […] year to Switzerland. So it goes. But tucked back in the report’s list of data tables was a fascinating one about intellectual property, and it put the US in 19th place worldwide when it comes to protecting […]

    Reply
  3. Quick Thoughts on IP Protection « Run with the Law says:
    15/09/2009 at 5:20 pm

    […] recent World Economic Forum survey rated the US 19th in IP Protection.  As Nate Anderson (over at Ars Technica) points out […]

    Reply
  4. Scholarly Communications @ Duke » The joy of statistics says:
    15/09/2009 at 5:26 pm

    […] property.  The United States ranks 19th on this chart, out of 133 countries rated.  As this blog post from IP Watch reports, that ranking prompted The US Chamber of Commerce to call for stronger protection measures […]

    Reply
  5. US Chamber of Commerce cites #19 rank, wants tougher IP laws | Superstars Of Gaming says:
    15/09/2009 at 9:21 pm

    […] year to Switzerland. So it goes. But tucked back in the report’s list of data tables was a fascinating one about intellectual property, and it put the US in 19th place worldwide when it comes to protecting […]

    Reply
  6. Web News Site » Blog Archive » Chamber Of Commerce Gets Basic Stats Backwards, Calls For Stronger US Patent Protection For No Good Reason says:
    24/09/2009 at 5:33 pm

    […] in how strong our intellectual property laws are. This report caused the US Chamber of Commerce to say it’s evidence that the US needs stronger IP laws. Yet, Smith points out how silly this analysis is. First, being 19th out of 133 is already pretty […]

    Reply
  7. The Big Mean IP Machine « The Sound of Brett says:
    29/10/2009 at 10:07 pm

    […] skewing the minds of these American business leaders… Thanks to Ars, as always. The List is here, on IP […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.