• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

European Patent Office: Patent Applications Slow As Rejections Rise

21/03/2009 by William New, Intellectual Property Watch 1 Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

In a trend appearing in other patent offices around the world, patent applications at the European Patent Office continued to rise in 2008, but at a slower rate toward the end of year. At the EPO, this was coupled with the lowest percentage of granted patents in its history.

The Munich-based EPO reported on 17 March that it received a total of 146,600 patent applications last year, compared with 141,400 in 2007, an increase of 3.6 percent. At the same time, with its commitment to patent quality, the grant rate for European patents dropped for the first time to less than 50 percent. Of applications received, 49.5 percent were granted, compared with 51 percent in 2007.

Refusals by the EPO shot up by 42 percent over 2007, with 4,500 cases, EPO said.

The move toward patent quality was hailed by the EPO as positive for the patent system and for innovation.

“The purpose of patents is to facilitate economic benefits for society by creating legal certainty in the market,” EPO President Alison Brimelow said in a statement. “We therefore need to continue to ensure quality in the patenting procedure.”

She said several practices instituted in recent years to improve patent quality and reduce workload are “beginning to bear fruit.” For instance, in 2004, EPO began giving early notice to applicants of their prospects of obtaining a patent, which can help companies decide to abandon some applications. And, she said, “the strict application of patentability criteria by our patent examiners has led to more refusals to grant a patent.”

“These,” Brimelow added, “are important steps to ensure the relevance of the patents entering the innovation process.”

German IP law blogger Axel Horn said in a post that allowance rates used to average above 60 percent, discussed reasons for the change, and argued that trilateral statistics between the leading IP owning nations’ (US, Europe, Japan) patent offices would be more useful.

EPO said that in 2008, its patent examiners conducted 120,900 examination procedures, and 59,800 were granted a European patent. Some 22 percent abandoned the application after a first opinion, and 28 percent ended with a withdrawal or refusal by EPO.

Applications from the 34 member states of the European Patent Organisation grew to reach 49.3 percent from 48.5 percent in 2007. Germany was first with 18.2 percent of the total (26 653 applications, an increase of 5.8 percent), followed by France with 6.2 percent (9,050, an increase of 8.3%) and the Netherlands with 5 percent (7,289, up 2.4 percent).

Filings from most countries continued to rise in 2008 over the previous year. Applications from the United States remained dominant among non-European countries at 25.5 percent, about level with 2007. The share of applications from Japan dropped slightly from 16.3 percent to 15.7 percent, and South Korean applications slowed slightly in the second half of 2008. China increased its applications and now ranks fifth most active among non-European applicants.

Most popular technical fields for filing activity were medical technology (17,000 applications, or 11.6 percent of total); electrical communications (14,850, 10.1 percent); and computing (9,520, 6.5 percent). Highest growth was in measuring and testing, electrical elements such as semiconductors and other electrical devices, and general engineering elements. Applications in the fields of biotechnology and genetic engineering, and organic chemistry dropped slightly.

By industrial sector, applications from EPO members grew most strongly in electronics such as semiconductors, optoelectronics and electronic devices, but dropped slightly in information and communications technology. Moderate growth was seen in industrial chemistry and polymers, and biochemistry and pharmaceuticals.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"European Patent Office: Patent Applications Slow As Rejections Rise" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, News, Themes, Venues, Biodiversity/Genetic Resources/Biotech, English, Europe, IP Law, Innovation/ R&D, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets

Trackbacks

  1. Boycott Novell » Patents Roundup: Red Hat Again; EPO and USPTO Debated says:
    22/03/2009 at 12:41 pm

    […] to litigation, that may be hard to tell. Earlier this year, the EPO had laid of some staff and it tried to claim a rise in patent quality. This tune is being propagated by IP Watch right now. In a trend appearing in other patent offices […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.