• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee Informal Text Under Debate

12/07/2007 by Tove Iren S. Gerhardsen for Intellectual Property Watch 2 Comments

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Below is the draft chair’s text under discussion at the 3-12 July World Intellectual Property Organization Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore (IGC). The committee has been in informal and “informal informal” (very small group of key delegations) meetings since late morning on 11 July. Discussion has been mainly focused on articles iii and iv, related to the committee’s future mandate. On 12 July, the committee appeared to reach a preliminary agreement to change articles v and vi, according to participants. The committee is attempting to final agreement on the chair text to be sent to the September WIPO General Assembly. Informal and “informal informal” meetings will continue this afternoon, the chair said.

Chair paper: 14:30, 10.vii.07

ITEM 10: FUTURE WORK

Draft decision: proposal by the Chair

The Intergovernmental Committee reviewed the progress made on its substantive agenda items at the current and previous sessions of its current mandate, and

(i) Agreed that solid progress had been made on its substantive work to date;

(ii) Agreed that its work had greatly benefited from the enhanced participation of representatives of indigenous and local communities made possible by various initiatives including the successful launch of the WIPO Voluntary Fund;

(iii) Agreed to recommend to the WIPO General Assembly that the current mandate of the Committee be renewed, including the five elements set out in document WO/GA/30/8, paragraphs 93 to 95;

(iv) Agreed that, in view of the mandated requirement to accelerate its work, the Committee should work towards producing concrete, substantive outcomes by the end of 2009 and to facilitate this acceleration of work the Committee at its next session should develop a timeline and methodology for its next mandate, once the General Asssembly agrees to renew its mandate;

(v) Agreed concerning its substantive working documents on item 7 (TCEs/EoF) that the Secretariat should prepare:

– a document that consolidates all comments provided before the tenth eleventh session and made during the eleventh session concerning each of the ten issues discussed;
– a document that provides a succinct, neutral summary of the range of discussion and commentary on each issue, without prejudice to any position taken on these issues;
– a reproduction of the text of the Annex of document WIPO/GRTKF/IC/9/4, which remains on the table as agreed at the tenth session.

(vi) Agreed concerning its substantive working documents on items 8 (TK) that the Secretariat should prepare:

– a document that consolidates all comments provided before the tenth eleventh session and made during the eleventh session concerning each of the ten issues discussed;
– a document that provides a succinct, neutral summary of the range of discussion and commentary on each issue, without prejudice to any position taken on these issues;

– a reproduction of the text of the Annex of document WIPO/GRTKF/IC/9/4, which remains on the table as agreed at the tenth session.

(vi) Agreed concerning its substantive working documents on items 8 (TK) that the Secretariat should prepare:

– a document that consolidates all comments provided before the tenth eleventh session and made during the eleventh session concerning each of the ten issues discussed;
– a document that provides a succinct, neutral summary of the range of discussion and commentary on each issue, without prejudice to any position taken on these issues;
– a reproduction of the text of the Annex of document WIPO/GRTKF/IC/9/5, which remains on the table as agreed at the tenth session.

(vii) Agreed concerning its substantive working documents on item 9 (genetic resources ) that the Secretariat should prepare:

– an annotated version of the list of options (WIPO/GRTKF/IC/11/8(a)) which would factually describe the current state of play in the Committee and in other international forums and;
– a further update of international developments based on document 8(b) which would include omissions identified in the current session, more recent developments, and any other relevant developments reported to the Committee.

Comments on this story may be sent to info@ip-watch.ch.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Creative Commons License"WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee Informal Text Under Debate" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: News, Biodiversity/Genetic Resources/Biotech, English, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge, WIPO

Comments

  1. Lynn Mytelka says

    23/07/2007 at 12:46 pm

    Given the importance of indigenous knowledge for developing countries not having concrete results before 2009 sounds quite negative especially since a number of countries have domestic legislation already in place and these negotiations have been going on for some time .

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. The Intergovernmental Committee: Eleventh Session | WIPO Monitor says:
    05/12/2013 at 8:37 pm

    […] WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee Informal Text under Debate […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.