• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

India Joins Opposition To Casablanca Patent Meeting Outcome

10/04/2005 by William New, Intellectual Property Watch 2 Comments

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

India, a critical player in policy debates at the World Intellectual Property Organisation, has announced its opposition to a recommendation on global patent harmonisation backed by a select group of countries in a February consultation with WIPO Director General Kamil Idris.

The recommendation was agreed to by all but one participant in an invite-only consultation Idris held in Casablanca, Morocco in mid-February. Some developing countries not invited to the meeting as well as invitee Brazil have since criticized the Casablanca gathering as reaching beyond WIPO’s mandate by entering into substantive discussions.

The recommendations that emerged resembled an earlier proposal by the “trilateral” group of the European Union, Japan and the United States, rejected last year at WIPO. The Casablanca statement recommended six issues be addressed in an accelerated manner within WIPO. The first four issues — prior art, grace period, novelty, and inventive step – would be addressed in the Standing Committee on Patents (SCP). The other two issues — sufficiency of disclosure and genetic resources – would be relegated to the Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore (IGC).

“India does not support the recommendations made by the Casablanca consultations, which would have the effect of separating the issues by placing them on two different tracks,” said a developing country official familiar with India’s letter. The concern is that the issues of disclosure and genetic resources, which are important to developing countries, would be sidelined in a separate committee.

Until India’s announcement on 5 April, there had been ambiguity over its position, since the Casablanca consultation was chaired by R.A. Mashelkar, director-general of India’s Council of Scientific and Industrial Research with a reputation as a proponent of intellectual property rights.

“On April 5, India clarified to WIPO that there has been no change in India’s long-standing position on subjects addressed at the Casablanca meeting,” a developing country official said of a letter sent to WIPO. India also clarified to WIPO that Dr. Mashelkar participated in his individual capacity.

India stated that in the Substantive Law Patent Treaty talks, which are taking place in the SCP, a “wholistic approach be adopted” and that all issues be tackled “within a single negotiating framework.”

India also said it is associated with the Friends of Development position on Casablanca, issued shortly after the consultation, which was unsupportive of the outcome. The Friends of Development is a group of fourteen developing countries that co-sponsored a fall 2004 proposal for a WIPO Development Agenda which is under discussion this week in Geneva.

India has indicated support for an elaborated proposal on the Development Agenda by the Friends of Development issued last week.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Creative Commons License"India Joins Opposition To Casablanca Patent Meeting Outcome" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: Themes, Development, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, United Nations - other, WIPO

Trackbacks

  1. India, WIPO Connect On Traditional Knowledge Protection, With Or Without Patents | Intellectual Property Watch says:
    28/03/2011 at 5:44 pm

    […] CSIR also had a run-in related to WIPO. In 2005, WIPO held an invite-only event outside Geneva intended to build support for a WIPO initiative to push patent harmonisation favoured by developed countries. CSIR Director-General R.A. Mashelkar chaired the event, and was represented by WIPO (without objection from the CSIR director) as India offering support for the WIPO initiative. The Indian government later clarified its opposition to the initiative and that Mashelkar attended on his own behalf (IPW, WIPO, 10 April 2005). […]

    Reply
  2. India, WIPO Connect On Traditional Knowledge Protection, With Or Without Patents « A2K Brasil says:
    28/03/2011 at 11:29 pm

    […] CSIR also had a run-in related to WIPO. In 2005, WIPO held an invite-only event outside Geneva intended to build support for a WIPO initiative to push patent harmonisation favoured by developed countries. CSIR Director-General R.A. Mashelkar chaired the event, and was represented by WIPO (without objection from the CSIR director) as India offering support for the WIPO initiative. The Indian government later clarified its opposition to the initiative and that Mashelkar attended on his own behalf (IPW, WIPO, 10 April 2005). […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.