• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

WIPO Committee Breaks Deadlock In Talks On Traditional Knowledge, Folklore

06/12/2006 by William New, Intellectual Property Watch Leave a Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

By William New
Member governments of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) this week broke a longstanding deadlock over how to discuss better protection of traditional knowledge and folklore. In addition, several countries stepped up their call for talks on genetic resources toward an international instrument.

The carefully constructed path forward on traditional knowledge and folklore (traditional cultural expressions) would allow discussion on substantive issues without specifically negotiating on earlier draft texts on protection previously prepared by the WIPO secretariat and partially rejected by some members, participants said.

Instead, after intensive consultations with the meeting chair, members agreed to collect comments on the draft texts and begin talks likely before week’s end on a non-specific list of issues drawn up by the secretariat. The move to focus on substance appears to represent a compromise on the part of the United States, Japan and some others who had urged that the talks first focus on principles and objectives. They faced a majority of countries who sought to move onto substantive debate. “This is it. We’ve moved to substance,” said one participant.

The existing draft texts, WIPO/GRTKF/IC/10/4 and WIPO/GRTKF/IC/10/5, are available here.

The 10 issues each for traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions address the underlying reason for greater protection and possible solutions (IPW, Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge, 5 December 2006).

Comments on the issues may be submitted until 31 March 2007. The next meeting of the IGC will be held in July. Some developing countries sought to add an interim meeting in the spring but a shortage of resources was cited, according to one official.

The discussions will proceed based on the list, but will not replace the preceding texts, which some say are in a draft treaty format (with principles, objectives and substantive elements).

For comments regarding the existing texts, the secretariat will make two tables, one for traditional knowledge and one for folklore, with two columns each. The columns will match comments up with the corresponding comments.

[Chair’s Draft on TK and TCEs – adopted 6 December]

1. Discussion will commence on the Issues in numerical order, if possible, during the current session, and will continue on that basis at the next session.

2. The existing documents (4, 5 and 6) remain on the table in their existing form and existing positions in relation to them are noted.

3. The discussion on the Issues is complementary to and without prejudice to existing positions in relation to the existing documents.

4. Delegations are invited to submit comments on the Issues by end of March 2007. The Secretariat will collate the comments under each of the issues and distribute them by end of April. All comments will be posted on the Internet on receipt.

5. In relation to existing comments on documents 4 and 5, the Secretariat will produce two tables (one for traditional knowledge and one for traditional cultural expressions/expressions of folklore) each containing two columns. In the first column, the titles of provisions in documents 4 and 5, as the case may be, will be reproduced, together with titles “general”, under the heading “Issues”. In the second column, the comments made by delegations and observers in relations to the titles in question will appear under the name of each delegation or observer.

William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Creative Commons License"WIPO Committee Breaks Deadlock In Talks On Traditional Knowledge, Folklore" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: News, Biodiversity/Genetic Resources/Biotech, English, Human Rights, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge, WIPO

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.