• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Genetics Company Myriad May Shift From Patents To Proprietary Data

03/03/2011 by Catherine Saez, Intellectual Property Watch 4 Comments

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Myriad Genetics, a United States-based biotechnology company with exclusive patent rights over a key breast cancer diagnostic test in the US, may shift its patent strategy from its inventions to guarding its data in the face of drawn out litigation and upcoming competition, an industry journal has reported.

The Genomics Law Report has published an analysis by a group of US academics and attorneys on how the company is likely to react to future competition.

Recent research on breast cancer diagnostic testing has been carried out by European and US research institutes, and they are saying they could offer considerably lower prices and better results than Myriad’s current testing. This upcoming competition is pushing the biotech company to shift its patent policy, according to the analysis. Myriad’s patents have been challenged in Europe and in the United States where there is an ongoing patent litigation.

Robert Cook-Deegan, director of the Center for Genome Ethics at Duke University (US), one of the study’s contributors, told Intellectual Property Watch that Myriad used to contribute its research data to public databases, but would be shifting its interest from patent protection of its inventions to protecting its data. According to Cook-Deegan, Myriad appears to have stopped providing data after 2004, although in the past they contributed more data to public databases than any other single source, he said.

Treating the database they built as a proprietary asset could be a problem for clinicians and patients, in particular after patent expiration. Myriad is tracking gene mutations “until they can interpret them,” he said. “That’s a great and a valuable asset … and they have good arguments they deserve fair reward for doing such work,” he said, but the negative side of it is that “business is coming to them mainly because of their patents, so this is a proprietary database leveraged on patent exclusivity.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Catherine Saez may be reached at csaez@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"Genetics Company Myriad May Shift From Patents To Proprietary Data" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, News, Themes, Biodiversity/Genetic Resources/Biotech, English, Health & IP, Innovation/ R&D, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets

Comments

  1. TradeSec says

    03/03/2011 at 4:30 pm

    What’s wrong with leveraging one’s IP to drive R&D to create more IP?
    Which shape the new takes (patents vs. trade secrets) should naturally depend on the circumstances, like how easy it is to patent and to enforce? If the current trends in genetics R&D is anti-patent and anti-enforcement, then it should be only natural that companies might shift from patent model to trade-secret model.

    Reply
  2. Dann says

    07/03/2011 at 10:41 pm

    That’s the spirit. Make saving lives a secret so people will pay out the nose, living long enough to see themselves in debt.
    Patents are for novel inventions, cancer medication is far from novel.

    Reply
  3. patent litigation says

    08/03/2011 at 12:51 am

    Although some are starting to view trade secret protection as a viable alternative to patent protection, trade secrets are much more vulnerable — and, once the cat is out of the bag, there is often little recourse for redressing that loss of secrecy. The recent, purported disclosure of the Coca-Cola recipe is just one story illustrating the tenuousness of trade secret IP rights. On the other hand, some may say that 40 years (of trade secret protection for Coke) is a pretty good run.
    http://www.aminn.org/patent-reform-act-2011-s23

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Genetics Company Myriad May Shift From Patents To Proprietary Data … says:
    03/03/2011 at 5:33 pm

    […] See the article here: Genetics Company Myriad May Shift From Patents To Proprietary Data … […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.