• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Chan: WHO Embarking On “Most Extensive” Reforms In Its History

16/05/2011 by Catherine Saez, Intellectual Property Watch 2 Comments

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

World Health Organization Director General Margaret Chan today presented her broad vision of a reformed WHO at the opening of the annual assembly of the organisation, and said the WHO was clear of suspicion of alleged pharmaceutical industry influence on the management of the H1N1 pandemic.

The World Health Assembly (WHA) meeting from 16-24 May will address diverse health-related issues, such as the future financing of the organisation, pandemic influenza preparedness, AIDS, fake medicines, communicable and noncommunicable disease, and reforms of the organisation.

Chan said the WHO is facing financial difficulties, and having to cut back on “some of our traditional areas of work,” but, she said, “We are most definitely not bankrupt.”

However, times have changed, she said. “When WHO was dealing mainly with germs, hygiene, medicines, vaccines and sister sectors, like water supply and sanitation, our job was much more straightforward. But that job has changed, gradually over time and then dramatically within the past decade,” she said, making reform essential.

WHO is “embarking on the most extensive administrative, managerial, and financial reforms, especially financial accountability, in its 63-year history,” she said.

“I have a vision,” Chan said, “of a WHO that gives a bigger voice to the many partners working on health, but encourages them to speak with a coherent voice that responds, first and foremost, to the needs and priorities as defined by recipient countries.”

“On this journey of reaffirmation, remembrance, reform and revitalisation,” that Chan called on countries to join, Chan said her vision included “a WHO that pursues excellence,” an efficient, responsive, objective, transparent and accountable organisation. She also called for effective development aid that builds capacities for countries. “Countries want a hand up, not a hand-out,” she said.

Chan’s vision is laid out in her report on the future of financing for WHO [pdf].

Chan’s opening speech was punctuated with the chorus phrase “remember the people,” as she commended advances in vaccines and in the improved accessibility of treatments in developing countries, such as a vaccine preventing meningitis in Africa. The vaccine, she said, was coordinated by WHO and PATH, a non-profit organisation, funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The vaccine was developed in record time, ant at about “one-tenth of the cost usually need to bring a product through development to the market.”

She also said that innovative financing mechanisms from the GAVI Alliance had helped issue new vaccines against diarrhoea and pneumonia.

A new diagnostic test for tuberculosis was also developed and “WHO endorsement of the test brought an immediate price reduction of 75 percent for developing countries,” Chan said. She also praised the “massive drug donations from both traditional and newly supportive pharmaceutical companies” of treatment of neglected tropical diseases.

“The purchasing power of development dollars has expanded, and this means expanded access to medical products for the poor,” she said, adding that all the achievements were the result of good collaboration with countries, other UN agencies, global health initiatives and funding mechanisms, civil society, foundations, and the private sector.

WHO’s Clean Hands in H1N1 Pandemic

Chan said that the report of the Review Committee on the Functioning of the International Health Regulations (2005) in relation to Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 had cleared the WHO of the allegation of possible undue influence by the pharmaceutical industry in the management of the H1N1 pandemic. Concerns after it became apparent that the virus turned out to be relatively mild and industry received a substantial financial benefit from the declaration of pandemic.

According to Chan, the report answers the two main questions about the pandemic: Was WHO right about declaring a pandemic, and were WHO decisions shaped by ties with the pharmaceutical industry. “In other words, did WHO declare a fake pandemic in order to line the pockets of industry?” she said.

Chan said that the 180-page report [pdf] “exonerates WHO on both counts.” The report offers some constructive criticism, and gives a number of specific recommendations to better prepare for the next global public health emergency.

WHO Having Identity Crisis, NGO Says

The People´s Health Movement issued a press release [pdf], saying that the WHO is facing a financial crisis, but “is also suffering from a crisis of identity and legitimacy.

WHO’s “role and mandate have been diluted and usurped by the proliferation of new actors in the field of global health,” it said.

“The driver of the reforms foreshadowed in the DG’s report [pdf] is the financial crisis in which the WHO finds itself,” the NGO said. “In accordance with the demands of the donors, the report simply addresses issues of effectiveness, efficiency, responsiveness, objectivity, transparency and accountability. However, while the report sets out broad directions for the WHO, it has few concrete recommendations and inadequate analysis of the financial crisis.”

US Backs WHO

United States Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sibelius, in her address to the plenary today, committed to supporting Chan’s agenda for reform.

Sibelius also said that progress has been made on infectious diseases, “but we must remain vigilant.” She highlighted the smallpox virus, and said the Assembly should not set an immediate date for the destruction of the last known samples of the virus.

“Today, most of the world’s population has no immunity to the disease, and it is quite possible that undisclosed or forgotten stocks of smallpox exist,” she said in prepared remarks, adding that the virus’ genetic code is available on the internet and the technology exists to wrongfully create a new smallpox virus in a laboratory.

The US has effective vaccines, but global supplies are limited. “We have more work to do before these safe and highly effective vaccines and antiviral treatments are fully developed and approved for use,” she said. “Once they are ready, we intend to share the fruits of this research with the world.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Catherine Saez may be reached at csaez@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"Chan: WHO Embarking On “Most Extensive” Reforms In Its History" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, News, Themes, Venues, Biodiversity/Genetic Resources/Biotech, Development, English, Health & IP, Human Rights, Innovation/ R&D, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer, WHO

Comments

  1. Riaz K Tayob says

    17/05/2011 at 9:37 am

    Chan is in a tough battle. 80% of her budget is off-budget not under member state control, a choice largely made by the rich country donors. This is a choice that is undemocratic and anti-multilateral. The failures of WHO (and exonoration or not) must be shared by the rich countries as well, who are the prime beneficiaries of WHO policies, even though something nice is done for the poor countries once in a while especially if there is good publicity on offer.
    What actually is happening in Global Public Health is a tragedy unfolding before our eyes. The same “stakeholders” (don’t you just love that pandering word?) who used the rich countries’ levers of power to kick African butt (on small pox, compulsory licenses, user-fees, swine flu “pandemic”;) are now using it against their populations: 40 million Americans without health care, the UK dismantling its NHS, pharma pricing in Australia under attack, etc. It was fine for WHO to parade the “steer don’t row” mantra for poor countries, but it fails to do it for the rich countries. Why? Chan is on a nice short leash!
    Will democratic multilateral governance win out or will WHO be on an even shorter leash after the much needed reforms? That is an open question, but if WHO is exonerated on the Swine Flu issue, then there ain’t no blowback, and it business as usual. And while there is a case for WHO reforms, if the rich countries are supporting it, then it is reasonable to presume that whatever “good stuff” is in the reforms will go the same was as the single payer issue in US Healthcare reform. Pity that WHO has not cultivated people with an institutional loyalty (obsequiousness pays, with good people and publications hounded out regularly by the organisation and rich countries) in the upper to provide some resitance. The only internal hope is the WHO Staff Association that for years relates critiques politely at meetings but hardly ever gets heard and whose prime concern is that WHO is a leading precarious employer in the UN system. Short leashes everywhere. And now we can expect that Global Public Health will move inevitably to the Global Health Security issue… as the rich countries ordered in the undemocratically selected title for a World Health Report.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. News updates out of World Health Assembly | Humanosphere says:
    18/05/2011 at 7:00 pm

    […] IP Watch: WHO head embarking on most extensive reforms in history […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.