• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Last Cheaper AIDS Medicines For Rwanda Under WTO

17/09/2009 by Intellectual Property Watch 1 Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

The 18th of September will mark the last shipment of lower-cost HIV/AIDS medicines from Canada to Rwanda under a World Trade Organization-sanctioned arrangement. The first shipment of the antiretroviral combination drug manufactured by Canadian pharmaceutical company Apotex was sent in September 2008, the second one had to take place in September 2009. The shipments were made possible through Canada’s Access to Medicine Regime (CAMR) set up to implement the so-called WTO “30 August 2003 decision,” or “paragraph 6” implemention. This decision allows WTO members who produce pharmaceutical products under compulsory licence to ship a majority of it to developing countries lacking production capacity. Before this, TRIPS said that drugs produced under CL had to be for “predominately” domestic use. The decision became an amendment of the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) in December 2005.

According to the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network, Apotex has said it will not make further attempt to use the Canadian access regime, blaming the long procedure it took to obtain a single licence authorising the shipment of a single AIDS drug to a single developing country. “In its current form, CAMR is unlikely to be used again due to the procedural requirements it puts on developing countries and generic pharmaceutical manufacturers,” they said.

Only one compulsory licence has been granted under the 30 August 2003 decision, according to Legal Network Executive Director Richard Elliott, and no other drug manufacturer in Canada is trying to use the opportunity with the current regime.

A change in legislation would be the only way forward, he said. Two bills currently in the Parliament backed by civil society groups would streamline the CAMR with a simplified “one-licence solution”. This would avoid the current requirement for separate negotiations with patent-holding pharmaceutical companies for each purchasing country and each order of medicines.

HIV/AIDS Legal Network Q&A here [pdf]

WTO information page here.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Creative Commons License"Last Cheaper AIDS Medicines For Rwanda Under WTO" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP-Watch Briefs, English

Trackbacks

  1. A Canadian Billionaire's Mysterious Death And Access To Medicines - Intellectual Property Watch says:
    20/12/2017 at 7:07 pm

    […] not repeat it (IPW, WTO/TRIPS, 1 October 2008). The last shipment was delivered in September 2009 (IPW, WTO/TRIPS, 17 September 2009), and since then, efforts have been made to encourage use of the waiver and to make some […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.