Login
You are not logged in.
Login | Subscribe

Subscribe/free trial 

Intellectual Property Watch subscribers receive exclusive access to stories published on the website under password protection, plus the Intellectual Property Watch monthly edition, a 16-page selection of the most important stories and features, including the People column and News Briefs section not available anywhere else. These columns contain the latest on personnel changes in the international IP community, and items on IP policy news and reports from around the world. The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available online and in print, mailed to your door.

Email alerts 

You can subscribe for free to receive automatic email notifications whenever new content is available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. Moreover, you can configure the alerts to fit your needs and interests by defining t he frequency, the type of content and even the language.

RSS feed 

What is RSS?

RSS (Really Simple Syndication) is an XML format of a web site or a weblog designed to allow the distribution and the sharing of information. An RSS feed or web feed provides headlines, brief descriptions and links to the full original content in a standard format.

More information is available on Wikipedia.

What is the benefit of using RSS feeds?

RSS is an easy way for you to be alerted when new content is posted on your chosen web sites, such as the Intellectual Property Watch website. Instead of visiting the IP-Watch website again and again to browse for new stories, the RSS feed automatically tells you when something new is posted.

What do I need to use RSS?

To start using RSS, you need a news reader or aggregator that displays RSS feeds from web sites or weblogs you selected. There are many different news readers, available as applications to be installed on your computer or as web services. Some web browsers such as Firefox and Safari can display RSS feeds too.

You can find a list on RSS Compendium.

Once you have set up your news reader, you simply subscribe to the RSS feeds you want.

How do I subscribe to the IP-Watch RSS feed?

Copy the URL of the IP-Watch RSS feed as provided in the left margin to your clipboard. Then follow the instructions on your particular news reader for adding / subscribing to RSS feeds.

Follow us on Twitter 

Latest Comments
  • In order to adress the issue of counterfeit,ite im... »
  • this is wrong! ACTA needs to be stopped before we ... »
  • Inside Views

    Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea on any relevant topic to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch, or leave a comment within any piece such as below.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

    The Relationship Between IP, Technology Transfer, and Development

    An analysis of practices and policies involving intellectual property, technology transfer and development shows the difficulties of achieving a positive correlation between those areas, writes Cheikh Kane.


    Rapport entre propriété intellectuelle, transfert de technologie et développement

    Une analyse des pratiques et des politiques impliquant la propriété intellectuelle, le transfert de technologie et le développement démontre la difficulté à parvenir à une corrélation positive entre les différents domaines, écrit Cheikh Kane.


    Intellectual Property Watch
    15 June 2009

    WIPO Appoints New Top Officials, Readies Policies On Conflicts Of Interest, Staff Cuts

    By William New @ 3:01 pm

    The member governments of the World Intellectual Property Organization’s executive body on Monday approved a set of seven most senior officials at the organisation to join the director general late this year. Monday’s Coordination Committee meeting also will address new policies on financial disclosure and conflicts of interest among top WIPO officials, and voluntary staff departures in the face of smaller budgets.

    The new deputy directors general are: Geoffrey Onyeama (Nigeria), Cooperation for Development (including Development Agenda and WIPO Academy); James Pooley (United States), Patents; Wang Binying (China), Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications; and Johannes Wichard (Germany) Global Issues (including enforcement, arbitration/mediation, communications, and the committee on genetic resources, traditional knowledge and folklore).

    The new assistant directors general are: Ambassador Trevor Clarke (Barbados), copyright and related rights; Ambi Sundaram (Sri Lanka), administration and management; and Yoshiyuki Takagi (Japan) global IP infrastructure.

    The officials were proposed for committee approval by Director General Francis Gurry (who took office on 1 October 2008) after months of private consultations with member governments. The Coordination Committee decision is the final approval. They all will take office on 1 December 2009 for five years until 30 November 2014. This includes Pooley, who was offered by the secretariat to start earlier to fill the patent role left open by Gurry’s election last year, as he could make the move to Geneva sooner, according to sources.

    The morning session saw a succession of member statements raising some concerns but in every case supporting the director general’s nominations.

    “It was a positive process,” a WIPO official said afterward. “It was not necessarily expected to be a positive process.”

    Among the concerns raised either in the plenary or in consultations leading up to the meeting, according to sources, was that some countries like the United States appear to have an appointee every time there is a rotation of top officials, while most others do not have direct representation at all.

    Pakistan, supported by others, praised the “inclusive and transparent consultative mechanism,” but restated a point the delegate said had been made to Gurry in informal consultations that the rotation of governments and regions should apply to all posts of deputy and assistant directors general.

    Pakistan also suggested that the WIPO Development Agenda activities fall directly under the director general’s responsibility, and that the “right person” should be in charge of each issue the organisation deals with. This would help ensure movement on policy issues that have been deadlocked for years such as the Intergovernmental Committee on Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore (IGC). Under the new WIPO structure, IGC issues, which are of great importance to developing countries trying to better protect their resources, fall under the German official, Wichard.

    In addition, it was raised during the process that none of the new appointments are representatives from Spanish or French-speaking countries despite their large presence in the WIPO membership.

    And some raised concern over term limits of five years instead of the customary six. The shorter terms were proposed by the secretariat to keep the cabinet appointments in line with the six-year term of the director general. Gurry took office one year before the end of the current outgoing DDGs and ADGs after previous Director General Kamil Idris left a year early under pressure.

    The final regional representation includes three from the same regional group, the Group B developed countries. The broader Asia-Pacific region overall also holds a high number of strategic positions, with the Director General (Australia), Chef de Cabinet (India), and three of the seven new appointees.

    The breakout is as follows: Barbados (Group of Latin American and Caribbean countries), China (its own regional group), Germany (Group B developed countries), Japan (Group B), Nigeria (African Group), Sri Lanka (Asian Group), and the United States (Group B).

    The biographies of the seven officials are available on the 15-16 June Coordination Committee meeting webpage.

    Onyeama is currently WIPO assistant director general for external relations, industry, communications and public outreach. Pooley is a partner at law firm of Morrison & Foerster, and founder and chair of Silicon Valley Lawyers for Obama during the 2008 election. Wang is WIPO assistant director general for administrative support services and General Assembly affairs. Wichard is deputy director general for commercial and economic law at the German Federal Ministry of Justice, and worked in the arbitration and trademark sections at WIPO from 1998-2006.

    Of the ADGs, Clarke is Ambassador of Barbados to the UN and other international organisations in Geneva, plus chair of the WIPO Committee on Development and IP, and chair of the World Trade Organization special session on a geographical indications register. He previously had a 41-year career as an engineer and executive at Cable & Wireless. Sundaram is director of the World Health Organization Department of Operational Support and Services, and was raised in Geneva. Takagi is WIPO executive director responsible for global IP infrastructure, the WIPO Academy and information technology.

    Click here for photographs of the new officials.

    100 Staff Cuts by 2010?

    The Coordination Committee on Monday also began addressing a potentially difficult secretariat proposal that could help the fee-based organisation’s bottom line during the global economic crisis, and clear the way for new positions to be created or filled by trimming some of the existing staff. In order to gain acceptance for his cabinet recommendations, Gurry may have suggested to member states that other opportunities in the organisation could arise. But he would need to create some room for incoming people as the budget is tight.

    This also could serve to encourage the departure of staff seen as working against the current leadership or the general well-being of WIPO during the bitterly divided recent past years, some sources suggested. Conversely, if the departure package is sufficiently attractive, it might also lead to the loss of some talented officials WIPO might have wished to keep, others said.

    WIPO staff in recent years generally have not appeared to be eager to leave. An average of nine staff persons per year have left WIPO in the past 5 years, according to the secretariat. Under the proposed pre-retirement and voluntary separation programmes, approximately 100 personnel are expected to leave by end of June 2010, it said.

    The separation programme stems from pressure to reduce staff in light of the economic downturn, and recommendations provided in 2007 by consulting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC).

    “The organisation is under increasing pressure to reduce the overall number of employees at a more rapid rate than can be achieved through projected retirements and natural attrition,” the WIPO secretariat said in a 29 May report prepared for the Coordination Committee meeting.

    PwC’s desk-to-desk report of employment at WIPO found (IPW, WIPO, 10 July 2007) that WIPO has a shortage of key skills, including “languages, management competences, information technology and specialist areas of intellectual property,” WIPO said.

    The organisation must fill the gaps by hiring skilled staff and replacing staff whose skills no longer match the organisation’s needs and who could not be reskilled or redeployed. This was confirmed by the “strategic realignment process” of the past 6-8 months under Director General Francis Gurry, who took office in October 2008.

    With the expected dropoff in filing fees at WIPO in the next few years due the economy, WIPO is looking to shed unnecessary jobs faster, despite being approved by its membership to create 22 new posts in 2009. As confirmed by PwC, the rate of attrition through retirements from the organisation is low. So the “most acceptable and humane” way to get more staff to leave sooner than they have to is to give more attractive termination conditions than they would otherwise get.

    Interested employees must apply by end of September 2009, with decisions made by end of December 2009.

    Financial Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

    The Coordination Committee also is to approve an incremental plan to require senior WIPO officials to disclose any interests, financial or otherwise, in issues of consideration at WIPO. The secretariat proposal would apply to the “director 1” level and above, of which there are currently 54 people, as well as personnel in the financial sections of the organisation. It is unclear how the plan applies to consultants at WIPO.

    The proposal includes the disclosure policies of several other international organisations, such as the International Criminal Court, World Health Organization, and International Monetary Fund.

    The WIPO declaration also would require staff to disclose any gifts, honours, political or other activities outside the organisation, and forbids staff in the International Bureau from seeking or accepting instructions from any government or other authority outside the bureau.

    The secretariat also plans to propose the Coordination Committee approve the new United Nations code of ethics for personnel, once it is approved by the UN General Assembly in September. The code would provide additional “overarching guidelines” for the organisation, the secretariat said.

    The Coordination Committee also will be asked to designate a chair of the WIPO Appeal Board. The chair since late 2007 has been Francisco Verros, the permanent representative of Greece to the United Nations, who has announced he will relinquish the responsibility. The proposed new chair is Dominick Devlin, a United Kingdom national who has been legal adviser to the International Labour Office in Geneva, as well as a legal officer at other UN agencies like the World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization.

     

    Photographs of the new appointees are below.

     

    Geoffrey Onyeama

    Geoffrey Onyeama

    James Pooley

    James Pooley

    Johannes Wichard

    Johannes Wichard

    Wang Binying

    Wang Binying

    Trevor Clarke

    Trevor Clarke

    Yoshiyuki Takagi

    Yoshiyuki Takagi

    Ambi Sundaram

    Ambi Sundaram

    William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.