Login
You are not logged in.
Login | Subscribe

RSS feed 

What is RSS?

RSS (Really Simple Syndication) is an XML format of a web site or a weblog designed to allow the distribution and the sharing of information. An RSS feed or web feed provides headlines, brief descriptions and links to the full original content in a standard format.

More information is available on Wikipedia.

What is the benefit of using RSS feeds?

RSS is an easy way for you to be alerted when new content is posted on your chosen web sites, such as the Intellectual Property Watch website. Instead of visiting the IP-Watch website again and again to browse for new stories, the RSS feed automatically tells you when something new is posted.

What do I need to use RSS?

To start using RSS, you need a news reader or aggregator that displays RSS feeds from web sites or weblogs you selected. There are many different news readers, available as applications to be installed on your computer or as web services. Some web browsers such as Firefox and Safari can display RSS feeds too.

You can find a list on RSS Compendium.

Once you have set up your news reader, you simply subscribe to the RSS feeds you want.

How do I subscribe to the IP-Watch RSS feed?

Copy the URL of the IP-Watch RSS feed as provided in the left margin to your clipboard. Then follow the instructions on your particular news reader for adding / subscribing to RSS feeds.

Email alerts 

You can subscribe for free to receive automatic email notifications whenever new content is available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. Moreover, you can configure the alerts to fit your needs and interests by defining the frequency, the type of content and even the language.

Subscribe/free trial 

Intellectual Property Watch subscribers receive exclusive access to stories published on the website under password protection, plus the Intellectual Property Watch monthly edition, a 16-page selection of the most important stories and features, including the People column and News Briefs section not available anywhere else. These columns contain the latest on personnel changes in the international IP community, and items on IP policy news and reports from around the world. The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available online and in print, mailed to your door.


Global IP Policy in 2010:
What You Need To Know
IP-Watch Year Ahead Series

Advertise Here

Latest Comments
  • @Sam: These laws apply here in Canada...that is fo... »
  • Great move on open innovation and effort to help t... »
  • Inside Views

    Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea on any relevant topic to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch, or leave a comment within any piece such as below.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

    Copyright Law Reform in Brazil: Anteprojeto or Anti-project?

    A balancing of the rights of authors and consumers, the re-introduction of a private copying exception, a remixing permission and a new regulatory agency for copyright issues are among the core points the Brazilian Ministry of Culture has planned for the new copyright law. But at the Third Conference on Copyright and the Public Interest in São Paulo a month ago, the Ministry emphasised that the bits and pieces shown to the audience were not from an actual law draft (”anteprojeto”) but only a preliminary proposal for formulating such a draft. The bill still has not been published to date. The delay in releasing the bill for public consultation now threatens the work of more than two years on the reform.


    Take Two: China’s Proposed Regulations For Patent-Involving National Standards

    The Standards Administration of China patent policy proposal fails to strike the desired balance and undervalues the intellectual property included in a standard. If implemented as worded, it will discourage the contribution of innovative technologies for use in national standards and the participation of patent holders, writes George Willingmyre.


    21 December 2007

    New Year Brings Prospect Of New WIPO Leader, Budget Agreement

    By William New
    [Note: Informal DG candidates listed below]
    The campaign season has begun to fill the top seat at the World Intellectual Property Organization, which is being vacated in 2008, one year early. At the same time, WIPO members have been debating over how and when to try again to end a stalemate over the organisation’s budget for the next biennium.

    As diplomats left for the holidays in Geneva, many governments appeared to be weighing possible candidates for the next director general. Any one of WIPO’s 184 member states may propose a candidate by the 13 February deadline. And what began as the subject of casual hallway banter last summer appears to have become a serious political issue.

    When it became apparent earlier this year that WIPO Director General Kamil Idris was under attack from influential member governments seeking his early removal for the fallout of having allowed an incorrect birth date to remain on WIPO records for more than two decades, the campaign wheels quietly started turning.

    Then the annual WIPO General Assemblies failed to reach agreement on a budget for the first time due to pressure from developed countries pushing to hold a discussion on Idris’ behaviour and ability to govern WIPO. Finally, Idris agreed to a deal to leave in autumn 2008, one year before the end of his term which concludes in late 2009. Idris will be paid his full original contract and benefits, and there does not appear to be any restriction on him continuing to serve within the UN system, according to officials.

    There have been efforts to resolve differences on the budget since the assemblies ended in early October. Many developing countries hold the view that the budget may proceed now that a deal has been reached with Idris. But some developed countries had pushed for Idris to step down immediately in September or October. After the deal was accepted to allow Idris to stay for another year, these countries showed concern about approving a new, larger budget and putting it in Idris’ hands, so they preferred to approve the budget later in 2008, sources said.

    The budget issue has mainly been addressed through regional coordinators and the General Assembly Chairman Martin Ohomiobhi, the Nigeria ambassador to the UN, and as recently as 18 December, the groups from Africa, Latin America and Asia appeared to support proceeding on the budget as soon as possible, sources said. Approval of the budget must come through the convening of a special session of the General Assembly. Sources said developed countries were considering agreeing not to block the launch of discussions on the budget, which could come early in the new year, though it was unclear whether this meant they would approve it then.

    Many of the key policy committees are scheduled to meet beginning in late February. The WIPO Audit Committee, about which no specific meeting information is available to media, will meet from 18 to 21 February. The Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore will meet from 25 to 29 February. The new WIPO Committee on Development, the overseer of the Development Agenda, meets from 3 to 7 March. And the Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights, which may still address broadcasting among other topics, will meet from 10 to 12 March.

    The WIPO Coordination Committee, the organisation’s executive body which includes about 80 member governments, will accept the nominations for the director general and gradually winnow it down to one name to recommend to the September General Assembly. The Coordination Committee is expected to meet to make its selection in May, according to a letter from committee chair Hilda Skorpen of Norway (IPW, WIPO, 20 November 2007).

    Informal Candidates List

    Informal discussions with diplomatic sources in Geneva revealed seemingly more than a dozen possible names of candidates at least, though none have been officially presented and none were confirmed with the governments themselves. Some countries had more than one name circulating. This list is not intended to be official nor comprehensive. The preliminary list includes:

    Australia:
    Francis Gurry, WIPO deputy director general responsible for patents, the Arbitration and Mediation Center, and global IP issues, and former general counsel

    Bangladesh:
    Toufiq Ali, former ambassador to the WTO and UN in Geneva

    Brazil:
    Jorge Costa Avila, president, Brazilian Institute of Industrial Property

    José Graça Aranha, WIPO director of the international
    registrations department, sector of trademarks, industrial designs and
    geographical indications

    France:
    Benoit Battistelli, director general of the French National Institute of Industrial Property

    Alain Pompideau, former president of the European Patent Office

    Honduras:
    Delmer Urbizo, ambassador to the UN

    India:
    Hardeep Singh Puri, has been ambassador to Brazil, and to the UN and WTO

    Italy:
    Carlotta Graffigna, WIPO executive director of the office of the controller

    Mauro Masi, professor and Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs delegate for intellectual property in Geneva

    Mexico:
    Jorge Amigo, director, Mexican Institute of Industrial Property

    Philippines:
    Enrique Manalo, ambassador of the Philippines to the UN, former chair of the WIPO General Assembly

    Poland:
    Alicja Adamczak, president of patent office

    Uruguay:
    Ernesto Rubio, WIPO assistant director general for trademarks, industrial designs, and geographical indications

    Others mentioned early in the process:

    Singapore:
    Geoffrey Yu, Singapore, former WIPO deputy director general

    Switzerland:
    Roland Grossenbacher, head of Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property

    France:
    Philippe Petit, WIPO Deputy Director General for General Affairs and Administration Sector

    Note: At least one source suggested candidates also might come from Kenya and Russia, but no names could be verified.

    William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.


    Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported  Print This Post Print This Post

    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.