SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

How Listing Ukraine As A Priority Foreign Country In Special 301 Violates WTO Agreements

Prof. Sean Flynn asks whether US sanctions of Ukraine under the US Special 301 program violates World Trade Organization rules. He also asks whether the operation of watch lists threatening sanctions for intellectual property matters could be challenged under the WTO even prior to any sanction going into effect.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    WIPO

    15/02/2013: WIPO Delegates To Clean Text Of Blind Treaty Before Diplomatic Conference In June
    13/02/2013: Event Explains Partnerships In Natural Products Research Through Thai Experience With Novartis
    13/02/2013: WIPO Side Event Addresses Recent Developments Related To The Nagoya Protocol
    12/02/2013: Year Ahead In IP, Biotech, Biodiversity: A Trio Fuelling Debates, Opportunities In 2013
    08/02/2013: Draft Text On Protection Of Genetic Resources On Its Way To WIPO Assembly
    08/02/2013: WIPO Update: Improved Text On Genetic Resources; Disclosure Still Undecided
    08/02/2013: Genetic Origin In Food And Agriculture Difficult To Identify, Say Seed Treaty Officials
    07/02/2013: People: Tracking IP Influencers’ Latest Moves
    06/02/2013: New Text Issued In WIPO Genetic Resources Talks
    06/02/2013: WHO, WTO, WIPO Provide Policymakers Policy Options For Public Health
    05/02/2013: WIPO: Positions Locked On Protection Of Genetic Resources; Experts To The Rescue
    05/02/2013: Indigenous Peoples Rights’ Reaffirmed By UN Rapporteur, Panellists, At WIPO
    04/02/2013: Plant Variety Protection Meets Resistance in Developing Countries; Consultations Coming
    01/02/2013: Intense Drafting Session Ahead For WIPO Delegates Working On Genetic Resources
    01/02/2013: Inside Views — Genetic Resources And Traditional Knowledge : Getting The Rules Right For Agriculture: A Key Challenge For WIPO’s IGC
    23/01/2013: IP Professionals Discuss Tech Transfer Potential In Humanitarian Business At WIPO
    22/01/2013: Inside Views: Development In Indian IP Law: The Copyright (Amendment) Act 2012
    17/01/2013: The Big Shift: A Look At Key Issues In International Copyright In 2013
    11/01/2013: UNITAID Wins Rights To Internet Domain Names
    09/01/2013: IP-Watch Looks At The Year Ahead In International IP Policy
    30/12/2012: Most-Read IP-Watch Stories Of 2012: India Pharma, Europe, ACTA, WIPO Technical Assistance, Gene Patents
    21/12/2012: At WIPO, A Complex Fight Against Counterfeiting, Piracy
    19/12/2012: WIPO Treaty For Blind Negotiation Set For Mid-June In Marrakesh
    18/12/2012: WIPO To Negotiate Treaty For The Blind In June; ‘Still Some Distance To Travel’
    17/12/2012: WIPO Members En Route To Diplomatic Conference On Treaty For The Blind
    16/12/2012: WIPO Visually Impaired Treaty: Voices From Africa On Dire Situation
    16/12/2012: Publishers Seek Support For Their Approach To WIPO Treaty
    16/12/2012: Great Expectations For WIPO Extraordinary General Assembly On Treaty For Blind
    16/12/2012: US IP Officials Blast NGOs In Geneva
    15/12/2012: WIPO Design Treaty: Work On Articles, Capacity Building Next Time
    13/12/2012: Technical Assistance Shows North/South Divide In Design Treaty Talks At WIPO
    12/12/2012: WIPO Committee Actively Drafting Treaty On Designs; Technical Assistance Up Next
    12/12/2012: WIPO Promotes Discussion On Indian Film Industry’s Benefit From IPR
    10/12/2012: A Closer Look Into A WIPO Regional Workshop: Making An Instant IP Whiz
    10/12/2012: Industrial Design On The Spot In WIPO Committee This Week
    08/12/2012: Single European Patent Dominates IP Summit As European Parliament Vote Nears
    07/12/2012: Geographical Indications Catching Up With Appellations of Origin At WIPO
    06/12/2012: US Congress Passes Act Implementing Patent Law Treaties
    03/12/2012: US Isolated In Opposition To WIPO Treaty For The Blind, Group Says
    30/11/2012: WIPO Members To Decide On GI Protection: Revised Agreement Or New Treaty?
    30/11/2012: WIPO, EPO Leaders At OECD: Adjust The Patent System For The Globalised, Knowledge-Based Society
    28/11/2012: Reshaping The International Copyright System To Facilitate Education In Developing Countries
    24/11/2012: WIPO Committee Finishes A Step Closer To Treaty For Visually Impaired
    23/11/2012: WIPO Negotiations Appear Nearer On Treaty For The Blind
    22/11/2012: NGO Views On WIPO Treaty For Blind Reveal Difficulty In Reaching Accord
    22/11/2012: Latest Text Of Treaty For Visually Impaired Shows More Work Needed
    21/11/2012: In Final Stretch Of Drafting Of WIPO Treaty For The Blind, Tensions High
    20/11/2012: Treaty For Visually Impaired Advancing At WIPO; Countries Ask For More Transparency
    19/11/2012: WIPO Director Pleads With Countries To Advance Treaty For Visually Impaired
    19/11/2012: Serageldin: IPR Adaptation Needed To Help Innovation Reach Small Farmers
    Your IP address is 23.22.252.150