SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • This is a good summary, except just to clarify one... »
  • Ellen 't Hoen will be a hard act to follow. She p... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    European Policy

    14/05/2012: EU Court Of Justice Upholds Limits Of Copyright On Software
    10/05/2012: Swiss Government Postpones ACTA Signature
    08/05/2012: German Ministry Advises Developing Countries Not To Sign ACTA
    03/05/2012: WIPO, EPO Sign Patent Cooperation Agreement
    01/05/2012: Lines Of Geographical Indications Debate Begin To Take Shape In The United States
    01/05/2012: Study On Non-Agricultural GIs Supported By European Commission
    28/04/2012: ACTA In Parliament: Kill Or Repair?
    26/04/2012: Day Marked By Initiatives On The Benefits Of IP, Open Technology
    17/04/2012: EU: Key Committee Urged To Seek Parliamentary Rejection Of ACTA
    16/04/2012: Changes Coming For Open Access To Research In Europe
    15/04/2012: Is ACTA Dying And Are G8 Countries Reacting To Its Impending Death?
    12/04/2012: Interview With Vladimir Nika: Enforcing IP Rights In Albania 2010 – 2015
    05/04/2012: EPO Response: No Tricks On Patents On Seeds And Plants
    04/04/2012: EU Copyright Levy Debate Rekindled; UK Needs Better Licensing, Study Finds
    04/04/2012: Group Says Industry, EPO Finding Loopholes To Patent Seeds, Plants
    02/04/2012: Book Details IP Rights And Development
    27/03/2012: European Parliament Rejects Referral Of ACTA To EU High Court
    22/03/2012: UK Parliament Group Conducts Post-Hargreaves Inquiry Into IP Policy
    21/03/2012: French IP Industry Experts Discuss IP Portfolios, Trademarks Online
    20/03/2012: French IP Lawyers Prefer No Favours For Green Tech Patents; Welcome America Invents Act
    19/03/2012: Debate Heats Up Ahead Of EU Parliament Discussion On ACTA
    15/03/2012: Council Of Europe Passes Internet Governance Strategy
    15/03/2012: Take The Brussels University Survey On Beliefs About IP
    14/03/2012: Blocking Of Internet Traffic Common In Europe – EU Report
    08/03/2012: European High Court Hears Case With Impact On Buying Software Online
    07/03/2012: A High-Level Collegium Calls For New Global Governance
    07/03/2012: Berlin Court Rules Facebook Violates User Rights
    07/03/2012: Study Seeks To Correct Flaws In Europe’s Copyright Levy System
    05/03/2012: EU Digital Commissioner: Open Public Data, The Oil Of The Digital Age
    05/03/2012: Internet Governance In 2012: Reaching New Heights Or Hitting A Wall
    02/03/2012: European Parliament Hears Pitch For ACTA; But Did It Change Minds?
    23/02/2012: ACTA Ratification Suspended In Europe, Awaits High Court Opinion
    13/02/2012: ACTA Doubts Rampant In Europe; Industry Call For “Reasoned Assessment”
    10/02/2012: EU-India Summit Kicks Off Amidst Warnings Of Impact On Medicines Access
    09/02/2012: Proposal For A New Model Giving Rights To Online Sharing Of Content
    08/02/2012: In 2012: Are Biotech, Ethics And Biodiversity Friends or Foes?
    02/02/2012: Will The Old Music Industry Giants Be Exchanged For New Ones?
    31/01/2012: European Commission Orders Italy To Drop Patent Linkage Delaying Generics
    30/01/2012: Geographical Indications Register Gains Ground Outside WTO
    27/01/2012: Most EU Members Sign ACTA; SOPA-Style Protests Building
    25/01/2012: ICC’s 2012 IP Roadmap Lays Out Key Policy Issues
    24/01/2012: EPO Advisory Board Priorities: Fees, Thickets, Quality
    23/01/2012: Is Piracy Part Of The Digital Ecosystem?
    23/01/2012: EU Telecoms Said To Be Unfairly Restricting Internet Access
    23/01/2012: Government Anti-Piracy Measures Working, Music Industry Says
    20/01/2012: US Senate Postpones PIPA Vote; EU Commissioner Joined Opposition
    19/01/2012: Year Ahead: Busy Copyright Schedule As Europe Seeks Economic Recovery
    18/01/2012: EU Innovation Commissioner Presents Horizon 2020
    17/01/2012: Record Patent Filings At EPO
    16/01/2012: Danish EU Presidency Priorities Include Research, Innovation, IP Rights