SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • This is a good summary, except just to clarify one... »
  • Ellen 't Hoen will be a hard act to follow. She p... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains

    19/05/2012: At WSIS Forum, Divisions Arise Over Future Of Internet Governance
    18/05/2012: US Legal Academics Call For Congressional Review Of ACTA
    17/05/2012: South Africa Hopes New Bill Brings Traditional Knowledge Protection
    16/05/2012: After Sharp Concerns, Cooperation Prevails On UNCTAD’s Mandate For Next Four Years
    14/05/2012: World Summit On The Information Society Review Launches This Week
    12/05/2012: Agreement On Future Work For Development Committee Snatched From Defeat At WIPO
    11/05/2012: ICANN IP Advisory Group: Whois, Dot-Brands, Contracts Key Sticking Points In New Domains
    11/05/2012: Fast By Senior WIPO Official Raises Old Staff Questions At UN Agency
    10/05/2012: Swiss Government Postpones ACTA Signature
    10/05/2012: Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation
    10/05/2012: As WIPO Director Reports On Development Agenda, Developing Countries Demand Full Implementation
    09/05/2012: WIPO Development Agenda Implementation: The Ongoing Fight For Development In IP
    08/05/2012: INTA: Corporate Call To Action On New Domains, Social Media, Counterfeiting
    08/05/2012: German Ministry Advises Developing Countries Not To Sign ACTA
    07/05/2012: WIPO Standards Committee: IP Geeks Meet Policy Wonks
    02/05/2012: Eben Moglen’s Warning: Beware Of Media Consuming You
    01/05/2012: Industry Report On Trade Secret Theft, Congressional Demand For IP Protection, As US-China Meet
    01/05/2012: Lines Of Geographical Indications Debate Begin To Take Shape In The United States
    01/05/2012: Study On Non-Agricultural GIs Supported By European Commission
    01/05/2012: Some Major Trading Partners Are Biggest IP Violators, USTR Says
    30/04/2012: Diplomatic Arm-Wrestling Over Scope Of International Telecommunication Regulations Treaty
    28/04/2012: ACTA In Parliament: Kill Or Repair?
    27/04/2012: Global Internet Governance: From Multistakeholder To Autopilot
    26/04/2012: Day Marked By Initiatives On The Benefits Of IP, Open Technology
    25/04/2012: Top Internet Experts Debate IP And Digital Content; WIPO A Balancing Mechanism, Gurry Says
    25/04/2012: US State Dept. Funds 12 IP Protection Projects Worldwide
    25/04/2012: Book Offers Timely Insights On IP, Drugs And Public Health In Developing Countries
    24/04/2012: Global Internet Conference Opens With An Air Of Possibility
    23/04/2012: Text Of Kenya Judgment On Anti-Counterfeiting Now Available
    22/04/2012: Internet Visionaries Convene In Geneva To Discuss Future Of The Web
    21/04/2012: Kenyan High Court’s Overturning Of Anti-Counterfeit Law Hailed
    18/04/2012: US Government Re-Issues Call For Bids To Manage Internet Root Zone
    17/04/2012: EU: Key Committee Urged To Seek Parliamentary Rejection Of ACTA
    15/04/2012: Is ACTA Dying And Are G8 Countries Reacting To Its Impending Death?
    12/04/2012: Former Senior Staff Say OECD Countries Trying To Stifle UNCTAD’s Work
    12/04/2012: Interview With Vladimir Nika: Enforcing IP Rights In Albania 2010 – 2015
    12/04/2012: US Government Report: IP Boon To US Economy, Accounts For 40 Million Jobs
    11/04/2012: Trade And Development With A Dash Of IP: Conference To Set Course For UNCTAD
    06/04/2012: WIPO Calms Anxiety About Technical Assistance To North Korea
    05/04/2012: Court Issues Decision On Intermediary Liability In Viacom v. YouTube
    05/04/2012: Intellectual Property Strategy: A Wise Man’s Guide
    04/04/2012: ‘Counterfeit’ Dropped From New WHO Protocol On Illicit Tobacco Trade
    04/04/2012: Honduras Files WTO Dispute Case Vs. Australia Over Tobacco IPR
    03/04/2012: External Review Of WIPO Technical Assistance Stirs Quiet Debate
    02/04/2012: US Trade Barriers Report Signals Work Ahead
    02/04/2012: Second Annual US IP Enforcement Report Shows Extensive Efforts At Home And Abroad
    02/04/2012: WHO / EU “Bad Medicine” Plans: Flaws, Coordination Gaps
    27/03/2012: European Parliament Rejects Referral Of ACTA To EU High Court
    23/03/2012: New Chair For WTO GI Register Talks Seeks New Ideas
    22/03/2012: WHO Head Urges Global Support For Australia In Fight Against Tobacco