SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

How Listing Ukraine As A Priority Foreign Country In Special 301 Violates WTO Agreements

Prof. Sean Flynn asks whether US sanctions of Ukraine under the US Special 301 program violates World Trade Organization rules. He also asks whether the operation of watch lists threatening sanctions for intellectual property matters could be challenged under the WTO even prior to any sanction going into effect.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge

    10/05/2013: South Africa To Launch National Traditional Knowledge Recording System
    03/05/2013: GIs Closer To International Status As WIPO Committee Recommends Treaty Negotiation
    02/05/2013: GIs Rub Against Trademark Protection In WIPO Discussions On Protection
    30/04/2013: UNCTAD Handbook: IP And The CBD Protocol On Genetic Resources
    29/04/2013: UNCTAD: IPRs In Health, Research, Cosmetics, Meet Access & Benefit Sharing
    28/04/2013: New WIPO Text On Traditional Knowledge Protection Cleaner But Issues Remain
    27/04/2013: Industry List Of Potential US GIs Released Ahead Of WIPO Meeting
    26/04/2013: In “Great Shame,” WIPO Fund For Indigenous Peoples’ Participation Running Dry
    24/04/2013: WIPO Committee Issues Revised Text On Traditional Knowledge Protection
    22/04/2013: Protecting Traditional Knowledge: WIPO Members Back To The Drafting Table
    10/04/2013: New Draft Traditional Knowledge Bill Published In South Africa
    09/04/2013: WIPO Hails India’s Accession To Trademark System; India Advocates Balance
    05/04/2013: African Regional Plant Variety Protection Draft Legislation Raises Protest
    04/04/2013: Linguistic Diversity Essential For Innovation, Development, Roundtable Speakers Say
    01/04/2013: GI Experts Speak Of Value But Concede International Accord Hard To Reach
    25/03/2013: UPOV 1991 Will Adversely Impact Farmers In Tanzania, Civil Society And Farmers Say
    25/03/2013: Inside Views: South Africa: Trampling Tradition – A Call For Support
    20/03/2013: At US-Led Workshop, African Stakeholders Call For “Home Grown IP Agenda”
    13/03/2013: On Plant Patents, EPO President Backs Industry, Disregards EU Parliament, Group Says
    12/03/2013: Leaked IP Chapter Of India-EU FTA Shows TRIPS-Plus Pitfalls For India, Expert Says
    01/03/2013: Speakers Outline Ideas For Africa To Find Appropriate IP Policies
    27/02/2013: With Lively Start, African IP Conference Addresses Medicines Access, GIs
    18/02/2013: Monsanto, Myriad: Two US Legal Cases Shaking Biotech Industries
    16/02/2013: Report On First Round Of Projects Of Seed Treaty Benefit-Sharing Fund
    15/02/2013: Inside Views: South Africa: Beating About The Rooibos
    13/02/2013: Inside Views: EU Digital Agenda 101: From Supporting Research To Meeting Social Challenges
    13/02/2013: Event Explains Partnerships In Natural Products Research Through Thai Experience With Novartis
    13/02/2013: WIPO Side Event Addresses Recent Developments Related To The Nagoya Protocol
    12/02/2013: Year Ahead In IP, Biotech, Biodiversity: A Trio Fuelling Debates, Opportunities In 2013
    08/02/2013: Draft Text On Protection Of Genetic Resources On Its Way To WIPO Assembly
    08/02/2013: WIPO Update: Improved Text On Genetic Resources; Disclosure Still Undecided
    06/02/2013: New Text Issued In WIPO Genetic Resources Talks
    05/02/2013: WIPO: Positions Locked On Protection Of Genetic Resources; Experts To The Rescue
    05/02/2013: Indigenous Peoples Rights’ Reaffirmed By UN Rapporteur, Panellists, At WIPO
    01/02/2013: Intense Drafting Session Ahead For WIPO Delegates Working On Genetic Resources
    01/02/2013: Inside Views — Genetic Resources And Traditional Knowledge : Getting The Rules Right For Agriculture: A Key Challenge For WIPO’s IGC
    09/01/2013: IP-Watch Looks At The Year Ahead In International IP Policy
    02/01/2013: Inside Views: Collaborative Capacity Building In Intellectual Property — Leveraging On African Diaspora Exchange
    07/12/2012: Chair Of Stalled WTO Talks On GIs May Take Another Tack
    07/12/2012: Geographical Indications Catching Up With Appellations of Origin At WIPO
    07/12/2012: Inside Views: From South Africa — Keeping Traditional Knowledge Traditional
    30/11/2012: WIPO Members To Decide On GI Protection: Revised Agreement Or New Treaty?
    29/11/2012: EU Parliament To Vote On Measure Against Biopiracy; Focus On UN Protocol
    27/11/2012: European Commission, ARIPO Sign Agreement On Agricultural GIs
    15/11/2012: Pending Decision On GM Maize In Mexico Under Fire
    08/11/2012: India Publishes Draft Guidelines For Patenting Of TK and Biological Material
    07/11/2012: WTO Members Launch Debate On IP And Innovation; LDCs Seek More Time To Enforce IP Rules
    29/10/2012: UPOV Council To Formalise Access To Documents; Civil Society Seeks Greater Participation
    12/10/2012: UN High-Level Meeting In India On Biodiversity Addresses Access And Benefit-Sharing
    09/10/2012: GI Protection Gets Boost In BRICs; Common Definition Needed For International Debates
    Your IP address is 79.171.81.124