SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • This is a good summary, except just to clarify one... »
  • Ellen 't Hoen will be a hard act to follow. She p... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Enforcement

    19/05/2012: Drug Safety Needs Global Cooperation Of Drug Regulators, Officials Say
    18/05/2012: US Legal Academics Call For Congressional Review Of ACTA
    17/05/2012: South Africa Hopes New Bill Brings Traditional Knowledge Protection
    14/05/2012: Amid “Korean Wave,” South Korea Opens IP Office In The Philippines
    11/05/2012: ICANN IP Advisory Group: Whois, Dot-Brands, Contracts Key Sticking Points In New Domains
    10/05/2012: Swiss Government Postpones ACTA Signature
    08/05/2012: INTA: Corporate Call To Action On New Domains, Social Media, Counterfeiting
    08/05/2012: German Ministry Advises Developing Countries Not To Sign ACTA
    01/05/2012: Industry Report On Trade Secret Theft, Congressional Demand For IP Protection, As US-China Meet
    01/05/2012: Some Major Trading Partners Are Biggest IP Violators, USTR Says
    28/04/2012: ACTA In Parliament: Kill Or Repair?
    26/04/2012: Day Marked By Initiatives On The Benefits Of IP, Open Technology
    25/04/2012: US State Dept. Funds 12 IP Protection Projects Worldwide
    23/04/2012: “Entrenched Anti-Consumer Bias” Found In Copyright Laws; Creators Launch Petition For Better Contracts
    23/04/2012: Text Of Kenya Judgment On Anti-Counterfeiting Now Available
    21/04/2012: Frustrations Show At Slow Progress On Protection Of Traditional Knowledge at WIPO
    18/04/2012: Divergences Clarified On Protection Of Traditional Knowledge At WIPO
    17/04/2012: EU: Key Committee Urged To Seek Parliamentary Rejection Of ACTA
    15/04/2012: Is ACTA Dying And Are G8 Countries Reacting To Its Impending Death?
    12/04/2012: Interview With Vladimir Nika: Enforcing IP Rights In Albania 2010 – 2015
    12/04/2012: US Government Report: IP Boon To US Economy, Accounts For 40 Million Jobs
    05/04/2012: Court Issues Decision On Intermediary Liability In Viacom v. YouTube
    04/04/2012: ‘Counterfeit’ Dropped From New WHO Protocol On Illicit Tobacco Trade
    02/04/2012: US Trade Barriers Report Signals Work Ahead
    02/04/2012: Second Annual US IP Enforcement Report Shows Extensive Efforts At Home And Abroad
    27/03/2012: European Parliament Rejects Referral Of ACTA To EU High Court
    22/03/2012: UK Parliament Group Conducts Post-Hargreaves Inquiry Into IP Policy
    21/03/2012: Special Report: Focus On Intermediaries’ Role Rises As Internet Matures
    21/03/2012: Nigerian Courts Step Up Against Copyright Piracy: 18 Convicted
    20/03/2012: French IP Lawyers Prefer No Favours For Green Tech Patents; Welcome America Invents Act
    19/03/2012: Debate Heats Up Ahead Of EU Parliament Discussion On ACTA
    19/03/2012: US Group Creates Social Platform To Lobby For And Create Internet Reforms
    15/03/2012: More Foreigners Find Themselves Targets Of US Copyright Law
    15/03/2012: Take The Brussels University Survey On Beliefs About IP
    14/03/2012: Ukraine WTO Trademark Dispute Vs. Australia Tests Public Health Measures
    14/03/2012: Blocking Of Internet Traffic Common In Europe – EU Report
    13/03/2012: US Aims To Boost Its Efforts Against Overseas Infringers
    12/03/2012: Costa Rican President Tells ICANN Of Concern Over Internet Restrictions
    07/03/2012: US Congressman Posts ACTA For Open Debate
    06/03/2012: Cybersquatting Cases Reached New Record In 2011, WIPO Reports
    05/03/2012: WIPO Sets Record For International Patent Filings In 2011; LDCs Not A Factor
    05/03/2012: Internet Governance In 2012: Reaching New Heights Or Hitting A Wall
    02/03/2012: European Parliament Hears Pitch For ACTA; But Did It Change Minds?
    29/02/2012: UN Human Rights Council Rallies On Right To Internet Freedom Of Expression
    29/02/2012: ACTA Debated At WTO; Petitions And Letters Fly In Brussels
    28/02/2012: Australian Tobacco Law May Head To WTO Dispute As TRIPS Council Meets
    27/02/2012: Inside Views: ‘Balanced’ Copyright: Not A Magic Solving Word
    26/02/2012: US, WIPO IP Summit In Africa Postponed
    23/02/2012: ACTA Ratification Suspended In Europe, Awaits High Court Opinion
    23/02/2012: WIPO Achieves Single Legal Text On Genetic Resources; Indigenous Peoples Back