SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

How Listing Ukraine As A Priority Foreign Country In Special 301 Violates WTO Agreements

Prof. Sean Flynn asks whether US sanctions of Ukraine under the US Special 301 program violates World Trade Organization rules. He also asks whether the operation of watch lists threatening sanctions for intellectual property matters could be challenged under the WTO even prior to any sanction going into effect.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Enforcement

    15/05/2013: IPR Lists For Trans-Atlantic Trade Deal Still Growing; Risk Of Locking In Old IPR Regimes?
    15/05/2013: Industry Report Calls For Fight Against Counterfeits In Free Trade Zones
    13/05/2013: US Supreme Court Rules In Favour Of Monsanto In Patent Exhaustion Case
    13/05/2013: How Listing Ukraine As A Priority Foreign Country In Special 301 Violates WTO Agreements
    09/05/2013: LDC Request For Waiver Of IP Obligations Meets Conditions From Developed Countries
    08/05/2013: US Senate Committee Evaluates US Cyber Threat Response Efforts
    06/05/2013: Infojustice.org: US, EU Demand TRIPS-Plus Concessions From Poorest Countries
    03/05/2013: GIs Closer To International Status As WIPO Committee Recommends Treaty Negotiation
    03/05/2013: Petition Fights Proposal For Digital Rights Management In Internet Core
    03/05/2013: Shippers Becoming Anti-Counterfeiting Target; Europe Takes Other Measures
    03/05/2013: US Study Calls For Objective Data To Inform Review Of Copyright Policy
    02/05/2013: GIs Rub Against Trademark Protection In WIPO Discussions On Protection
    30/04/2013: UNCTAD Handbook: IP And The CBD Protocol On Genetic Resources
    28/04/2013: New WIPO Text On Traditional Knowledge Protection Cleaner But Issues Remain
    27/04/2013: Industry List Of Potential US GIs Released Ahead Of WIPO Meeting
    25/04/2013: Anti-Counterfeiters Focus On Organised Crime, Softer Public Message
    24/04/2013: Inside Views: Global Public-Private Partnerships Against IP Crimes: How Interpol Avoided The Failures Of WCO And WHO
    16/04/2013: WIPO Delegates Progressing On Once-Moribund Broadcasting Treaty
    12/04/2013: New SMS Tool To Report Non-Tariff Trade Barriers At African Borders
    12/04/2013: Debate In Beijing: ICANN As Online Content Regulator?
    10/04/2013: Questions Follow Sharp Rise In Investor-State Disputes, Far-Reaching Cases
    09/04/2013: Protection of Broadcasting Organisations, Another Treaty Brewing At WIPO
    09/04/2013: WIPO Hails India’s Accession To Trademark System; India Advocates Balance
    04/04/2013: Six EU Countries Take Legal Action Against Google Over Privacy
    02/04/2013: WIPO Opens Fifth External Office, In Moscow
    01/04/2013: GI Experts Speak Of Value But Concede International Accord Hard To Reach
    28/03/2013: WIPO Reports Another Record In Cybersquatting Disputes In 2012
    28/03/2013: European Commission Eyes Modernisation Of EU Trademark System
    26/03/2013: United States Chided As TRIPS Scofflaw At WTO
    26/03/2013: ICANN Trademark Clearinghouse: Preregistration Rights Only For Those Who Pay?
    25/03/2013: Comparison Of US, EU Treaties Highlights Differences On ISP Liability
    25/03/2013: Diverging Views On IPR Protection Needs In Africa Emerge At IP Workshop
    22/03/2013: German Parliament Votes To Protect News Snippets From Republishing
    21/03/2013: US Objective For EU-US FTA: Elevate IPR Enforcement
    21/03/2013: Global Pharma Companies See Battle For Survival In Pakistan
    20/03/2013: At US-Led Workshop, African Stakeholders Call For “Home Grown IP Agenda”
    19/03/2013: US Supreme Court Applies First Sale Doctrine Worldwide
    19/03/2013: Samsung Lawyer Assesses IP Legal Battle With Apple
    18/03/2013: Nearly 50 Groups Demand IPRs Out Of EU-US FTA
    18/03/2013: Practitioners Discuss Interconnection Between Professional Sports And IP
    18/03/2013: African Ministers Focus On IP Role In Innovation For Development; Less On Flexibilities
    14/03/2013: Interpol, Pharma Join Hands Against The Crime Of Fake Pharmaceuticals
    14/03/2013: US Perspectives: US Tries Gentler Copyright Enforcement
    14/03/2013: USTR: IPRs Among “Most Challenging” Issues As TPP Talks Accelerate
    13/03/2013: Pirate Bay Loses Its Appeal To European Court Of Human Rights
    12/03/2013: Meetings On IP And Innovation In Africa Open In Tanzania
    12/03/2013: Leaked IP Chapter Of India-EU FTA Shows TRIPS-Plus Pitfalls For India, Expert Says
    11/03/2013: Digital Rights, Health Concerns As TPP Talks Continue
    07/03/2013: WTO Hears Health, Economic Considerations Of Plain Packaging For Tobacco
    06/03/2013: WTO: Wide Support For LDC TRIPS Extension, With A Hitch
    Your IP address is 77.88.26.27