SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments

For IPW Subscribers
A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

Monthly Reporter

The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


Biodiversity/Genetic Resources/Biotech

12/05/2012: Agreement On Future Work For Development Committee Snatched From Defeat At WIPO
21/04/2012: Frustrations Show At Slow Progress On Protection Of Traditional Knowledge at WIPO
18/04/2012: Divergences Clarified On Protection Of Traditional Knowledge At WIPO
16/04/2012: Medicines Patent Pool Director Ellen ‘t Hoen To Leave Next Month
14/04/2012: Negotiators Aim For Progress On Traditional Knowledge Protection Treaty
13/04/2012: US Supreme Court Edges Toward Reviewing Extent Of GMO Patents
05/04/2012: EPO Response: No Tricks On Patents On Seeds And Plants
05/04/2012: After Mayo, Is Patent Law More Restrictive In US Than Europe?
04/04/2012: Group Says Industry, EPO Finding Loopholes To Patent Seeds, Plants
02/04/2012: Book Details IP Rights And Development
27/03/2012: US Supreme Court Reverses Myriad Decision Allowing Gene Patents
21/03/2012: US Supreme Court Narrows Patentable Subject Matter
13/03/2012: WHO Under Siege By Private Sector, Group Asserts
23/02/2012: WIPO Achieves Single Legal Text On Genetic Resources; Indigenous Peoples Back
22/02/2012: Indigenous Peoples Walk Out Of WIPO Committee On Genetic Resources
19/02/2012: WIPO Members Work Through Differences In Genetic Resources Document
17/02/2012: WHO Group Keeps Lid On Bird Flu Lab Results – For Now
17/02/2012: WIPO Members Begin Work On Single Text On IP And Genetic Resources
15/02/2012: WIPO Members Aim For Single Text On Genetic Resources Protection
13/02/2012: Ideas Offered For IP And Genetic Resources In WIPO Committee
08/02/2012: In 2012: Are Biotech, Ethics And Biodiversity Friends or Foes?
30/01/2012: Geographical Indications Register Gains Ground Outside WTO
30/01/2012: WHO, Gates, Industry And NGO Leaders Elevate Attention To Neglected Diseases
23/01/2012: SOPA, Piracy, Pharmaceuticals May Dominate US IP Policy Discussions In 2012
13/01/2012: The Year Ahead 2012: Top IP Legal Issues In The United States
11/01/2012: Book: Shape Up International Reforms To Address Food Security
03/01/2012: Most-Read IP-Watch Posts Of 2011 Tell Story Of International IP Policymaking
19/12/2011: GIs A Candidate For The Exclusive Club Of Appellations Of Origin At WIPO
10/12/2011: WIPO Patent Committee Agrees To Continue Discussions On All Issues
10/12/2011: New Guide Issued To Help Developing Countries Embrace GIs, As WTO, WIPO Meet
06/12/2011: America Invents Act Forges Ahead; Concerns Remain About First-To-File, Other Provisions
21/11/2011: 10 Years Of TRIPS And Public Health: An Anniversary To Celebrate?
16/11/2011: European Audit Of GIs Shows Need For Clear Rules, Awareness
08/11/2011: Inside Views: The Mad Hatter In Wonderland: South Africa’s New TK Bill
02/11/2011: USPTO, Small Businesses Talk Patent Reform, Harmonisation, Fee Diversion
01/11/2011: WHO’s Chan Pitches UN Agency’s “Staying Power,” Unique Role
27/10/2011: Revised EPO Patent For Conventional Broccoli Has Public Interest Ramifications
25/10/2011: WIPO Re:Search Webpage Goes Live, Shows Sponsors
23/10/2011: WTO IP Committee Addresses Medicines Access, Plain-Packaged Tobacco, ACTA
20/10/2011: UPOV Sprouts A New Public Face – As Farmers Protest
20/10/2011: UPOV Marks 50 Years; Breeders Seek More Enforcement, Civil Society Wants In
19/10/2011: WIPO To Launch New Drug R&D Database For Neglected Disease Licences
18/10/2011: EU High Court Bans Patents On Human Embryo Stem Cells For Commerce
11/10/2011: Unpunished Human Rights Violations Challenge Right To Food, Activists Say
10/10/2011: With WTO Stalled, GI Industry Proponents Move To Create Their Own Register
04/10/2011: Nagoya Protocol On Biodiversity Benefit-Sharing Has 64 Signatories
27/09/2011: Talk Of Treaties, Revenue Increase, Development As WIPO Annual Assemblies Kick Off
15/09/2011: Experts Still Divided On Influence Of IP On Biodiversity Conservation
14/09/2011: South Africa Conference On IP And Innovation
02/08/2011: Myriad Outcome: Winds Shift Again For Gene Patenting In The US