Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Summer Interns

IP-Watch interns talk about their Geneva experience in summer 2013. 2:42.

Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

The Politicization Of The US Patent System

The Washington Post story, How patent reform’s fraught politics have left USPTO still without a boss (July 30), is a vivid account of how patent reform has divided the US economy, preempting a possible replacement for David Kappos who stepped down 18 months ago. The division is even bigger than portrayed. Universities have lined up en masse to oppose reform, while main street businesses that merely use technology argue for reform. Reminiscent of the partisan divide that has paralyzed US politics, this struggle crosses party lines and extends well beyond the usual inter-industry debates. Framed in terms of combating patent trolls through technical legal fixes, there lurks a broader economic concern – to what extent ordinary retailers, bank, restaurants, local banks, motels, realtors, and travel agents should bear the burden of defending against patents as a cost of doing business.

Latest Comments
  • “We want everybody to agree on the science telling... »
  • So this is how we mankind will become extinct? No ... »

  • For IPW Subscribers

    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >



    01/12/2011: Philippines: IP Office Cannot Issue Injunctions On Counterfeit Claims
    02/08/2010: 中国防火长城:网络审查何时会违反世贸组织规则?
    17/05/2010: 厄瓜多尔的新举措:用自由软件打击盗版
    29/04/2010: 《国家标准涉及专利的处置规则》最新稿:是不是向前一步?
    26/04/2010: 公开渠道信息公司控告IBM违背反托拉斯法而IBM要求分析
    03/04/2010: 在WHO就假冒伪劣药品问题吹风会上观点激烈交锋
    09/02/2010: 欧洲审议WHO“无稽之谈”之际WHO筹备关于流感及病毒共享的新会议
    26/01/2010: 再论中国涉及专利的国家标准制修订管理规定草案
    11/01/2010: 联合援助国际药品采购机制(UNITAID)将实施艾滋病专利药品库
    15/10/2009: 专家组:获取安全药品是公共卫生问题而非知识产权问题
    30/09/2009: 传统知识的命运——世界知识产权组织大会的一项关键决议
    12/08/2009: 美国最高法院复审比尔斯基案可能震动专利制度
    29/07/2009: 世界知识产权组织成员国审议2010至2011年计划预算草案
    25/06/2009: 世界海关组织考虑设立新的反假冒伪劣“对话机制”
    28/05/2009: 戈兰案可能判决美国违反国际版权条约
    08/04/2009: 高级人权工作组把目光投向健康和知识产权问题
    24/02/2009: 欧盟有关知识产权的强硬规定被视为对贫困国家医药获得的威胁
    09/02/2009: 对世贸组织体系和药品运输关切四起 TRIPS会谈重燃
    29/01/2009: 希望世界卫生组织在五月大会前针对假冒伪劣产品行动达成共识
    22/12/2008: 禽流感准备会议取得进展 知识产权问题有待解决
    22/12/2008: 联合国领导的互联网治理论坛 触及知识产权并展望未来
    22/12/2008: 拉米看到《TRIPS协议》与公共卫生 的进展并敦促运用好审议制度
    22/12/2008: 发达国家推动非洲反假冒努力快速发展
    27/11/2008: 关于谷歌图书馆项目对知识存取影响的问题
    Your IP address is