SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Interns Summer 2013

IP-Watch interns talk about their Geneva experience in summer 2013. 2:42.

Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Quantitative Analysis Of Contributions To NETMundial Meeting

A quantitative analysis of the 187 submissions to the April NETmundial conference on the future of internet governance shows broad support for improving security, ensuring respect for privacy, ensuring freedom of expression, and globalizing the IANA function, analyst Richard Hill writes.


Latest Comments
  • Why should anyone care what James Anaya thinks? In... »
  • If this goes ahead, as the EU will "speak" for all... »

  • For IPW Subscribers

    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >


    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >

    Inside Views

    20/03/2014: Quantitative Analysis Of Contributions To NETMundial Meeting
    17/03/2014: How To Safeguard Trade Secrets: Think ROI
    10/03/2014: New Constitutions Of Egypt, Tunisia Provide For IP Rights Protection For First Time
    03/03/2014: UN Internet Governance Discussion: Why Did It Fail To Agree And Why Will Discussions Continue?”
    18/02/2014: Where Policy Fora Collide: Country-Code Top-Level Domains And The TPP
    13/02/2014: South Africa Promotion And Protection Of Investment Bill 2013 – A Review
    23/01/2014: Global Health 2035 Report: Flawed Projections
    17/01/2014: India: The Full Spectrum On FDI In Brownfield Companies
    20/12/2013: Another Look At Patents And Standards
    12/12/2013: The EU-Thailand FTA: What Fate For Access To Medicines?
    14/11/2013: Inside Views: Capture, Sunlight, And The TPP Leak
    23/10/2013: Inside Views: WHO Performance Undermined By Inadequate EU Collaboration
    04/10/2013: Inside Views: Some Notes On Developing Policy And Law In Caribbean Intellectual Property
    18/09/2013: Inside Views: Stop Treating Symptoms And Start Curing Diseases: The End Of Graduated Response
    26/08/2013: Inside Views: Patently Geopolitical: The New Frontier of Government And Market Interaction
    29/07/2013: Inside Views: Motorola vs. Microsoft And The Future Of FRAND
    15/07/2013: Inside Views: Micro Entity Status For Universities And AIA Rulemaking On Power Of Attorney
    04/07/2013: Inside Views: Happy Birthday To You, Copyrighted
    26/06/2013: Inside Views: WIPO Treaty For The Blind Shows That Transparency Can Work (And Is Necessary)
    14/06/2013: Inside Views: To What Extent Can Global IP Rules Be Responsive To Public Interest Demands? The Case Of The Treaty For The Visually Impaired
    13/06/2013: Inside Views: Interview With Tanja Rajić: The Impact Of EU Enlargement On Trademark Practice In Croatia
    27/05/2013: Inside Views: Focus On Quality For Patients Saves Billions Of Dollars
    24/05/2013: Inside Views: WHO Should Have The Evidence? Ben Goldacre Refutes WHO Director’s Claim
    13/05/2013: Inside Views: How Listing Ukraine As A Priority Foreign Country In Special 301 Violates WTO Agreements
    08/05/2013: Inside Views: IPRs And The WTO’s New Brazilian President: Heading South, Hopefully Up
    24/04/2013: Inside Views: Global Public-Private Partnerships Against IP Crimes: How Interpol Avoided The Failures Of WCO And WHO
    15/04/2013: Inside Views: The Novartis Decision: A Tale Of Developing Countries, IP, And The Role Of The Judiciary
    04/04/2013: Inside Views: The Judgment In Novartis v. India: What The Supreme Court Of India Said
    27/03/2013: Inside Views: Why So Many Patent Filings Were Filed In The US On Or Before 15 March 2013
    25/03/2013: Inside Views: South Africa: Trampling Tradition – A Call For Support
    04/03/2013: Inside Views: Should Industry Support LDCs’ Request For Unlimited Time To Implement The TRIPS Agreement? Absolutely
    15/02/2013: Inside Views: South Africa: Beating About The Rooibos
    13/02/2013: Inside Views: EU Digital Agenda 101: From Supporting Research To Meeting Social Challenges
    01/02/2013: Inside Views — Genetic Resources And Traditional Knowledge : Getting The Rules Right For Agriculture: A Key Challenge For WIPO’s IGC
    31/01/2013: Inside Views: Pending Cutback In EU Spending For Development Cooperation
    29/01/2013: Inside Views: Potential Elements Of The WHO Global R&D Treaty: Tailoring Solutions For Disparate Contexts
    22/01/2013: Inside Views: Development In Indian IP Law: The Copyright (Amendment) Act 2012
    02/01/2013: Inside Views: Collaborative Capacity Building In Intellectual Property — Leveraging On African Diaspora Exchange
    07/12/2012: Inside Views: From South Africa — Keeping Traditional Knowledge Traditional
    18/11/2012: Inside Views: Fixing Canada’s Access to Medicines Regime — Bill C-398
    09/11/2012: Inside Views: EU Health Cooperation — Room For Improvement
    06/11/2012: Inside Views: Sizing Up The “Ill-Conceived” PAIPO Draft Statute
    24/10/2012: Inside Views: In Search of Relevance, Not Solutions: The Truth About ITU’s ‘Patent Roundtable’
    21/09/2012: Inside Views: Medals, Models And Moguls
    19/09/2012: Inside Views: Patently Wrong – The Jury’s Verdict In Apple v. Samsung
    12/09/2012: Inside Views: How To Reboot WIPO
    08/09/2012: Inside Views: The Contributions Of Julian Assange To The Debate On Intellectual Property
    06/08/2012: Inside Views: Form Over Function – The ECJ Rules On Software Copyright
    23/07/2012: Inside Views: Access To Medicines And Intellectual Property In Jordan
    20/06/2012: Inside Views: An Anthem To Ignorance: South Africa’s Case Of Nkosi Sikelel’ iAfrika
    Your IP address is 146.247.137.82