SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments

For IPW Subscribers
A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

Monthly Reporter

The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


Finance

23/05/2011: Workplan Of WHO Group On Neglected Diseases R&D Shows Timeline
17/05/2011: Bill Gates Calls For “Vaccine Decade;” Explains How Patent System Drives Public Health Aid
16/05/2011: Patent Licensing Experts Share Lessons Learned In Making Deals
06/05/2011: USPTO Director Kappos Outlines A Pro-Active, Value-Driven Patent Office
02/05/2011: WHO Calls For Proposals To Finance R&D For Diseases Affecting Developing World
15/04/2011: Special Report: World’s First IP Financial Exchange To Come Online This Year
15/04/2011: WIPO Hails 2 Millionth International Patent Application
07/04/2011: Inside Views: Financial Transaction Tax: A Resource For WHO Global Strategy And Plan of Action
23/03/2011: Google, Authors, Will Need To Rethink Digital Book Settlement
23/03/2011: Pharma Industry Seeks To Bring A Fresh Face To Public Health Policy
15/03/2011: UN Agencies Encourage Use Of WTO Measures To Lower HIV Medicines Costs
15/03/2011: Copyright System Must “Adapt Or Perish,” WIPO Director Says
10/03/2011: Medicines Patent Pool Aims To Increase Access To HIV Drugs In Developing Countries
11/02/2011: Economist: Breadth Of Patent Portfolio Better Than Betting On One Winner
07/02/2011: WIPO Survey On Patent Filing Strategies Shows Rise In Optimism
28/01/2011: Innovation, Generic Drugs, Patents In Congress Follow Obama’s State of the Union Speech
26/01/2011: Midem Music Congress: The Two Universes Of The Music Business
25/01/2011: WHO Gears Up For Reform Driven By Financial Shortfall
11/01/2011: The 2011 Drug Patent ‘Cliff’ And The Evolution Of IP Valuation
06/01/2011: Special Report: Music Industry’s Lavish Lobby Campaign For Digital Rights
17/12/2010: WIPO’s Gurry Says ‘Crisis In Multilateralism’ Bringing Changes To IP
02/12/2010: Patent System Mainly Serves Select Developed Country Industries, Study Says
22/11/2010: Global Copyright Licensing Doubts And What To Do About Them
09/11/2010: Panellists: Copyright Law’s ‘Byzantine Maze’ Stalling New Business Models
08/11/2010: European Officials Eye Pan-European Passport For Collective Copyright Licencing
29/10/2010: Compromise UN Protocol Treaty Against Biopiracy Adopted In Japan
26/10/2010: Climate-Ready Crop Patents Present Danger For Biodiversity, Group Says
25/10/2010: European Ruling Could Reshape Collective Copyright Levy System
20/10/2010: Copyright Industry Makes Pitch For Economic Benefit Of Anti-Piracy In Developing Countries
20/10/2010: Study Touts Economic Benefits Of Biodiversity
01/10/2010: First Patent Holder Grants Licences To UNITAID
30/09/2010: Study Shows Climate Change Innovation Concentrated In Few Nations
18/09/2010: US Companies, Officials Discuss Policies To Boost IP Value, Cut Costs
16/09/2010: Economists Report Empirical Evidence Of TRIPS Impact On Developing Countries
03/09/2010: Human Survival Depends On Shared Technology, Says New UN Climate Chief
01/09/2010: Key Committee Debates Changes In WIPO Performance, Spending
09/08/2010: Intellectual Property Watch Thanks You For Your Support
28/07/2010: US Jobs Bill Would Restrict Foreign Access To Patent Applications
28/07/2010: Reminder: Urgent Call To Support Intellectual Property Watch
16/07/2010: OECD Sees New Angle On Innovation For Growth, Social Challenges
05/07/2010: Help Intellectual Property Watch!
01/07/2010: US Economist: US Financial Patents Litigation-Prone; Low Quality Makes Them Easy Targets
18/06/2010: Comparative Analysis Shows US Patent Office Scores Poorly On Patent Quality