Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Summer Interns

IP-Watch interns talk about their Geneva experience in summer 2013. 2:42.

Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

The Politicization Of The US Patent System

The Washington Post story, How patent reform’s fraught politics have left USPTO still without a boss (July 30), is a vivid account of how patent reform has divided the US economy, preempting a possible replacement for David Kappos who stepped down 18 months ago. The division is even bigger than portrayed. Universities have lined up en masse to oppose reform, while main street businesses that merely use technology argue for reform. Reminiscent of the partisan divide that has paralyzed US politics, this struggle crosses party lines and extends well beyond the usual inter-industry debates. Framed in terms of combating patent trolls through technical legal fixes, there lurks a broader economic concern – to what extent ordinary retailers, bank, restaurants, local banks, motels, realtors, and travel agents should bear the burden of defending against patents as a cost of doing business.

Latest Comments
  • So this is how we mankind will become extinct? No ... »
  • 'Business methods were generally not patentable in... »

  • For IPW Subscribers

    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >

    Author Archive

    01/08/2014: UK Adopts Private Copying Exception As Some Rightholders Mull Legal Action
    17/07/2014: Human Eggs That Can’t Develop Into Human Beings Should Be Patentable, EU High Court Advisor Says
    30/06/2014: EPO President Battistelli’s Term Extended Amid Staff Concerns
    06/06/2014: WIPO Chief Calls for Seamless, Global, Legal Digital Content Regime
    29/05/2014: UK IP Advisor Points To Online Search Engines To Do More Against Piracy
    15/05/2014: EPO Internal Strife Spills Over Into European Parliament, Human Rights Court
    19/03/2014: European Patent Office Staff Calls Strike; President Battistelli Reacts
    13/03/2014: EU Unified Patent Court Judicial Training Centre Launches
    06/03/2014: EPO Sees More Applications, More Modernisation, Battistelli Says
    25/02/2014: EU Trademark Reform Delayed; Debate Includes Goods-In-Transit, Harmonisation
    23/01/2014: Year Ahead: Copyright Issues Top EU IP Policy In 2014
    29/11/2013: European Commission Floats Proposal To Stop Theft Of Trade Secrets
    13/11/2013: “Licences For Europe” Stakeholder Dialogue Ends With Some Agreement, Some Criticism
    18/10/2013: European Commission Market-Tests Samsung Antitrust Commitments
    29/07/2013: European Commission Proposes Rules Changes To Create Unitary Patent Court
    11/07/2013: EU High Court Upholds Private Copy Levies On First Sale Of Blank Media
    27/06/2013: Copyright Levies Can Be Imposed On Sale Of Printers, Computers, EU High Court Rules
    13/06/2013: UK Intellectual Property Office Seeks Comment On Copyright Exceptions
    07/05/2013: Viewing Cached Copyrighted Content Isn’t Infringing, UK Supreme Court Says
    12/04/2013: EU General Court Clears Copyright Collecting Societies Of Antitrust Charges
    28/03/2013: European Commission Eyes Modernisation Of EU Trademark System
    05/03/2013: “Works For Hire” A Key Issue As Music Stars Begin Terminating Copyright Transfers
    27/02/2013: European Copyright Reform On Slow Track, Observers Say
    19/02/2013: 24 EU Members Sign Unified Patent Court Agreement
    14/02/2013: EU Unitary Patent And Court Are Here. Or Are They?
    31/01/2013: Mediator’s Report On EU Copyright Levies Recommends Major Changes
    17/01/2013: The Big Shift: A Look At Key Issues In International Copyright In 2013
    11/12/2012: European Unitary Patent And Court Becomes Reality
    29/11/2012: EU Parliament To Vote On Measure Against Biopiracy; Focus On UN Protocol
    20/11/2012: EU Patent, Patent Court Could Finally Be Approved In Coming Weeks
    15/11/2012: EU Parliament, Scientists Press Governments To Boost Research Funding
    15/10/2012: EU Rights Owners Blast ICT Industry For Trying To “Hijack” Copyright Levy System Talks
    06/09/2012: US Congressional Push For Release Of TPP Text; US Pressuring Nations Bilaterally?
    03/08/2012: Divergent Approaches To Copyright Reform Emerge In Europe
    17/07/2012: EU, UK Announce Plans To Open Access To Scientific Research
    16/07/2012: Industry Groups Press For EU, US Action On Trade Secret Protection
    27/06/2012: UK Parliament Panel Urges Government To Speed IP Reforms
    09/06/2012: EU Negotiators Tentatively Agree On Plan For Orphan Works
    16/04/2012: Changes Coming For Open Access To Research In Europe
    04/04/2012: EU Copyright Levy Debate Rekindled; UK Needs Better Licensing, Study Finds
    02/03/2012: European Parliament Hears Pitch For ACTA; But Did It Change Minds?
    19/01/2012: Year Ahead: Busy Copyright Schedule As Europe Seeks Economic Recovery
    30/11/2011: EU Picks Up Pace On Copyright Licensing, Private Copying, Unitary Patent
    18/10/2011: EU High Court Bans Patents On Human Embryo Stem Cells For Commerce
    06/10/2011: ECJ Decision On Exclusive Broadcasting Licences Could Reach Beyond Sports
    20/09/2011: Breakthrough Gives EU Principles For Digitising Out-Of-Print Books
    12/09/2011: EU Extends Copyright Protection From 50 To 70 Years
    31/08/2011: UK Copyright Modernisation Effort Picks Up Steam
    13/04/2011: Proposals For Single EU Patent Issued; Doubts About EU Patent Court Remain
    12/03/2011: EU Takes Actions On Patent Law; ACTA May See Legal Fight
    Your IP address is