• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Ratification Of Marrakesh Treaty For The Blind Postponed In Europe?

08/05/2015 by Intellectual Property Watch 4 Comments

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

By Monika Ermert for Intellectual Property Watch

The German Federation of Blind and Partially Sighted today sounded the alarm over another dispute about the “Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired or Otherwise Print Disabled”. The German and the Italian governments are blocking a compromise on the path for ratification in the European Union, the Blind Federation said in a press release. The EU Council of Ministers is expected to take a decision on the ratification next week.

[Update:] According to the Latvian Presidency, the EU ratification of the Marrakesh Treaty was not on the agenda for 11  May. The presidency currently is working to resolve the differences over competency between the majority and a blocking minority of member states. In addition, to facilitate the process the presidency had proposed to request the Commission to come up with a legislative proposal adapting the EU law to the Marrakesh Treaty. This was on the agenda of the General Affairs Council of 19 May. [end update]

The Marrakesh Treaty was negotiated at the World Intellectual Property Organization in June 2013.

The reason for the disagreement, a German Federation spokesperson told Intellectual Property Watch, is that the German government is of the opinion that the treaty should be ratified as a so-called mixed agreement.

“Transborder exchange of books for the blind would fall under economic law for which the Union was competent,” the federation for the blind said.

Changes in national copyright law to implement access to German books to allow making the copies in specific formats would fall under national copyright law.

A spokesperson of the German Ministry of Justice confirmed that there was a dispute about whether the Marrakesh Treaty is a mixed agreement or falls under the sole competency of the EU.

“It is not an issue at all over the substantial text of the agreement,” the spokesperson told Intellectual Property Watch. Instead, the legal competence issue is what caused the delay.

The question of who is competent has resulted in many discussions between governments and EU Commission, also in other dossiers, for example trade agreements.

“It is unfortunate that it is the Marrakesh Treaty that is held up this time,” the Justice spokesperson said.

The German government signed the treaty last summer and was in favor of ratifying it. Wolfgang Angermann, president of the European Blind Union, sharply criticised the German government. “The objection by the German Government is not about legal formalities, it is about lack of political will,” he said.

Angermann called on the German government to agree to a proposal on the table that would allow the EU to ratify, but make it possible for individual member states to decide if they want to become a party.

If a decision can be made during a Council meeting on Monday, the spokesperson of the German Blind Federation warned, a deferral of the issue to the European Court of Justice is possible resulting in a long delay for implementation of a treaty that already has taken years to finalise.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Creative Commons License"Ratification Of Marrakesh Treaty For The Blind Postponed In Europe?" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP-Watch Briefs, IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, Access to Knowledge/ Education, Copyright Policy, English, Europe, Human Rights, Innovation/ R&D, Regional Policy, WIPO

Comments

  1. john e miler says

    16/05/2015 at 11:29 pm

    Maybe should read ” If a decision canNOT be made during a Council meeting on Monday ..”

    BTW it wasn’t.

    Reply
  2. john emiller says

    21/05/2015 at 7:38 am

    OUTCOME OF THE COUNCIL MEETING
    Brussels, 19 May 2015

    INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (Page 8)

    Treaty on access to published works for blind and visually impaired people

    The Council adopted a decision requesting the Commission to submit a legislative proposal with a view to amending the EU’s legal framework so that it complies with the Marrakesh Treaty to facilitate access to published works for persons who are blind, visually impaired or otherwise print disabled.

    http://t.co/3GL1TgQcYy

    Reply
  3. William New says

    21/05/2015 at 8:43 pm

    John, thank you for the pointer. William New

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Hírmorzsák #5.10 - COPY21 says:
    28/05/2016 at 12:15 pm

    […] Csúszik a Marrakeshi Szerződés EU-s aláírása – Az IP Watch nemrég arról számolt be, hogy elhúzódni látszik a Marrakeshi Szerződés Európai Uniós aláírása. A német és az olasz kormány ugyanis úgy látja, hogy arra kizárólag a tagországoknak van joga, és nem az EU kompetens szerveinek. Ana Ramalho Kluwer Copyright Blogon közzétett írásában azonban pont amellett érvelt, hogy e téren az EU-nak van kizárólagos hatásköre. Elsőre talán technikainak tűnő, mégis jelentős dogmatikai probléma. Igaz, hogy azóta az Európai Tanács határozat formájában kezdeményezte az Európai Bizottságnál, hogy tegyen lépéseket a szerződés aláírására. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.