• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

European Parliament Votes For Renewal Of Mandate For Internet Governance Forum

11/02/2015 by Monika Ermert for Intellectual Property Watch 2 Comments

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

The European Parliament today adopted a resolution calling on the UN General Assembly to renew the mandate of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF), while strengthening its resources and the multi-stakeholder model of internet governance.

The Parliament resolution is available here. The list of amendments is here.

UN member states have so far failed to renew the mandate of the forum, which was established as a discussion forum in 2006 as an outcome of the UN-led 2003 and 2005 World Summit of the Information Society (WSIS).

The IGF‘s future will be on the agenda for UN General Assembly next autumn, after a UN high level meeting on WSIS+10.

The resolution initiated by seven Parliament party groups members described the IGF as a process that offers “a positive and concrete context for the shaping of the internet’s future on the basis of a multi-stakeholder approach.”

Despite the fact that the IGF did not adopt formal conclusions, Parliament stressed that “lessons can already be learnt” from the nine IGF annual editions, especially “as regards regulatory aspects of electronic communication, data security, and privacy issues.”

In the plenary debate preceding today’s vote, online fundamental rights, countermeasures to mass surveillance by intelligence services and net neutrality were highlighted as topics for continued discussion at the IGF and the EU level.

At the same time the resolution also calls on EU member states and the European Commission to meet to push the completion of the transition of oversight of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA). The United States has up to now held special influence over the body responsible for making underlying changes to the internet. The IANA function is managed by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN).

While supporting the targeted September 2015 deadline for transition, the Parliament also wants due attention given to “full accountability and transparency of ICANN” in that process.

In an amendment introduced by the Socialists and Democrats (S&D), the Parliament called on the EU institutions “to propose the EU itself as a first international partner with ICANN as regards IANA functions, including a role on equal grounds with the US and other states in the affirmation of commitments that are currently regulating IANA services.”

The Parliament resolution was welcomed by several industry associations and civil society groups, including Access, European Digital Rights (EDRi) and the Computer & Communications Industry Association.

CCIA Europe Director Christian Borggreen in a press release said the resolution would send “a strong signal of Europe’s support for our multi-stakeholder governance model and for the renewal of the IGF’s mandate.” He warned against succumbing to the “temptation to use the IGF as a bargaining chip by those countries seeking a more government-controlled model for Internet governance.”

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Monika Ermert may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"European Parliament Votes For Renewal Of Mandate For Internet Governance Forum" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, Access to Knowledge/ Education, Copyright Policy, English, ITU/ICANN, Information and Communications Technology/ Broadcasting, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains

Trackbacks

  1. European Parliament Votes For Renewal Of Mandate For Internet Governance Forum | DomainNewsAfrica says:
    13/03/2015 at 4:48 pm

    […] As originally posted by Monika Ermert on Intellectual Property Watch […]

    Reply
  2. EDRi's press review 2015 - EDRi says:
    27/11/2015 at 4:07 pm

    […] European Parliament Votes For Renewal Of Mandate For Internet Governance Forum (Intellectual Property […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.