• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Preparations Begin For Lisbon Revision At WIPO; Procedural Question Raised

15/10/2014 by Catherine Saez, Intellectual Property Watch 5 Comments

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

The 28-member Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration is en route to being revised to include geographical indications and allow international organisations to join the agreement. But some other member countries of the World Intellectual Property Organization, which oversees the agreement, are raising procedural questions and intend on having a say in the revision.

The preparatory committee for a diplomatic conference (high-level final treaty negotiation) is scheduled to take place on 30-31 October to decide on the diplomatic rules of procedure. The diplomatic conference is expected to take place in May 2015.

The proposed revision would allow geographical indications (GIs) from a Lisbon member to be protected in all of the Lisbon member countries. Just as with appellations of origin, when a country would seek protection for a new GI, member countries of the Lisbon system would have a certain amount of time to refuse such protection in their territory.

The revision comes after a working group was set up in 2008 to study ways to increase the Lisbon Agreement membership. The working group drafted a revision of the agreement, in particular to include GIs. An international register of geographical indications would also be set up, such as the current one on appellations of origin.

In 2013, the Lisbon Union decided to convene a diplomatic conference in 2015. The WIPO director general proposed in a document dated 25 August that the diplomatic conference be held from 11-21 May 2015. The government of Portugal has officially offered to hold the diplomatic conference, which must be confirmed by the preparatory committee.

Meanwhile, according to a source, nine countries have tabled a proposal to the preparatory committee asking that the draft rules of procedure be amended so that all WIPO members can participate in the diplomatic conference in the same capacity.

[Update:] The proposal was posted today to the WIPO website, available here [pdf]. The proposal includes a list of examples of rules of procedure for past diplomatic conferences, including the Hague, Singapore, Beijing and Marrakesh treaties.

The countries putting forward the proposal are: Australia, Chile, Israel, New Zealand, Panama, South Korea, Singapore, United States and Uruguay. Israel is a Lisbon member. The Lisbon membership list is here.

At the preparatory committee meeting, “for which non-Lisbon members have been invited as observers, the draft rules of procedure will be discussed together with the proposed amendment and Lisbon members will decide on the text of the draft rules of procedure that will be submitted to the diplomatic conference,” said the WIPO source.

Opponents of the current wording of the revision, in particular the United States, contend that including geographical indications in the Lisbon Agreement is not merely a revision of the agreement, but would create a new treaty. They have been asking that all WIPO members be allowed to participate in the diplomatic conference, on equal footing with the Lisbon Agreement members. WIPO has 187 members [corrected].

Lisbon members consider that they should be able to revise an agreement that applies only to its own members.

The United States tabled a proposal in that sense to the WIPO Coordination Committee during the WIPO Assemblies in September, but no conclusion was reached by the committee (IPW, WIPO, 29 September 2014).

It is unclear how the distinction is made between a treaty or a revision. For instance, the 2006 Singapore Trademark Law Treaty made small updates to the existing treaty, but was considered a treaty. It also might be unclear whether a diplomatic conference is a formal treaty negotiation or can be used for revisions or other types of instruments, a discussion that came up in the past at WIPO in relation to proposed instruments for the protection of genetic resources, traditional knowledge and folklore.

Draft Rules of Procedure, Attendance

The current Rule 2 (Composition of the Conference) of the draft rules of procedure [pdf] of the diplomatic conference states that the conference will be attended as follows:

(i) delegations of the States members of the Lisbon Union (hereinafter referred to as
“the Member Delegations”),

(ii) the delegations of the African Intellectual Property Organization and the European
Union (hereinafter referred to as “the Special Delegations”),

(iii) the delegations of States members of the World Intellectual Property Organization
which are not members of the Lisbon Union and the delegations of States members of the
United Nations which are not members of the World Intellectual Property Organization
(hereinafter referred to as “the Observer Delegations”), and

(iv) representatives of intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations and
others invited to the Conference as observers (hereinafter referred to as “the Observers”).

Countries in opposition are considering a change of some paragraphs of these rules, to broaden participation to all WIPO delegations, a source said.

Opponents of the current draft rules of procedure also note that the rules present the European Union and the Organisation Africaine de la Propriété Intellectuelle (OAPI) as “special delegations,” and apply the provisions for Lisbon members to them, except for voting. The EU and OAPI are not WIPO members. The change proposed by the US and others would make it possible for both international organisations to join Lisbon outright.

According to the list of invitees [pdf] to the diplomatic conference, members of the Lisbon Union would be considered as “member delegations,” with a right to vote. OAPI and the EU would be invited as “special delegations” with the same status as member delegations but could not vote, and other WIPO members and United Nations members which are not members of WIPO would be invited as “observer delegations,” without the right to vote.

Image Credits: Flickr – Leo Reynolds

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Catherine Saez may be reached at csaez@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"Preparations Begin For Lisbon Revision At WIPO; Procedural Question Raised" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP Policies, Language, Subscribers, Themes, Venues, Access to Knowledge/ Education, Biodiversity/Genetic Resources/Biotech, Enforcement, English, Environment, Europe, Regional Policy, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains, Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge, WIPO

Trackbacks

  1. Draft Revision To Provide Higher Protection To GIs Fine-Tuned At WIPO says:
    28/10/2014 at 2:55 pm

    […] Preparations Begin For Lisbon Revision At WIPO; Procedural Question Raised […]

    Reply
  2. Geographical Indications At WIPO: Members Dissent On Participation In Treaty Talks says:
    03/11/2014 at 8:52 pm

    […] Preparations Begin For Lisbon Revision At WIPO; Procedural Question Raised […]

    Reply
  3. US Congressional Leaders Blast WIPO Lisbon Treaty Negotiations says:
    13/02/2015 at 1:19 am

    […] indications. A diplomatic conference, a high-level final treaty negotiation, is scheduled for May (IPW, WIPO, 15 October 2014). Non-Lisbon members are welcome to attend the negotiation but will have a limited […]

    Reply
  4. Status Of Potential WTO Wines And Spirits Register Discussed says:
    24/02/2015 at 1:05 pm

    […] Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration, (IPW, WIPO, 15 October 2014), he said. A treaty negotiation conference will be held on the Lisbon amendment in […]

    Reply
  5. WIPO Members Demand Full Participation In GI Negotiations At WIPO says:
    05/05/2015 at 3:36 pm

    […] Back in October, nine countries, including Israel, put forward a proposal to amend the rules of procedures of the diplomatic conference as well as the list of invited member states to allow full participation of the whole WIPO membership on an equal basis at the diplomatic conference (IPW, WIPO, 15 October 2014). […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.