• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

South Africa Moves Toward New IP Policy; Rooibos Industry Seeks Protection

23/08/2013 by Linda Daniels for Intellectual Property Watch 1 Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

CAPE TOWN – The South African National Intellectual Property Policy is expected to be published this month, after a much-anticipated wait to see what shape and form the policy has given intellectual property rights in the country.

During its meeting on 7 August, the Cabinet approved the National Intellectual Property Policy for public comment. The contents of the policy will only be made available to the public once it is published in the Government Gazette.

While no date was announced for the publication of the policy in the government gazette, Simphiwe Ncwana, director of commercial law and policy in the South African Department of Trade and Industry, told Intellectual Property Watch that it is expected to be published this month.

Thirty days will then be set aside for public comment from the time of publication in the Gazette.

Ncwana did not give much away with regards to the policy’s content, saying only, “We have done some changes.”

This policy is a reworking of a 2010 draft and has been several years in the making, having been circulated by government internally as well as incorporating outside input in order to shape and refine ahead of submitting to Cabinet for approval.

Stakeholders are keen to understand how the proposed new IP policy will impact them. In particular, the local Rooibos tea industry – seen as a distinct, traditional product – has been feeling exposed without a national IP policy.

Earlier this year, the rooibos industry was confronted by a French company’s attempt to trademark Rooibos. At the time, Trade and Industry Minister Rob Davies said in a press statement that his department stood ready to defend South Africa’s trade and intellectual property interests “vigorously” and that the attempt to trademark Rooibos would require an “urgent assessment of the legal options to strengthen the protection of the Rooibos name in South Africa.”

Rooibos tea industry stakeholders are hopeful that the latest proposed IP policy has made some provision for the protection of Rooibos. The distinctive red tea leaves are endemic to South Africa, and the caffeine-free brew part of South African culture.

Following this latest attempt to trademark rooibos by a foreign company, Davies has now confirmed that a geographical indication (GI) is being pursued within the context of a European Union and South Africa trade framework.

Davies told Intellectual Property Watch that he expects that there would be “reciprocal protection from the EU within the EU’s own regime as part of the economic partnership agreement negotiations.”

However, under EU law, a product must be protected in its home country before it can be given GI status.

GI protection in the EU also is being sought for other South African products such as Karoo lamb and Honeybush tea.

Geographic indications are a way of protecting products with particular characteristics deriving from a specific region. Some European examples include Champagne, Parma ham and Feta cheese.

Soekie Snyman, spokesperson for the South African Rooibos Council, said that following the latest foreign attempt to trademark Rooibos earlier this year, the council began pursuing all available alternatives to protect the Rooibos name.

This included applying for protection under the Merchandise Marks Act. This effort bore fruit when trademarks to describe the tea product known as Rooibos were published in the Government Gazette for public comment. The window period for public comments was open until 12 August.

The following marks were listed:

• Rooibos
• Red Bush
• Rooibostee
• Roobos Tea
• Rooitee
• Rooibosch

If the proposed protection under the merchandise marks act comes into effect, then it provides a signal to European authorities that the term has been secured by local legislation.

The council has also pursued another option of protection for Rooibos under the Agricultural Products Standards Act and is awaiting word of approval from the relevant government department.

The market growth of Rooibos tea has been a steep trajectory with the tea now available worldwide and especially favoured amongst the health-conscious. Rooibos tea is strictly speaking an herbal brew.

Rooibos is an indigenous plant grown solely in parts of the Western Cape and Northern Cape of South Africa.

The recent attempt by the French company to trademark Rooibos brought to the surface memories of a similar attempt by an American company, Burke International. In 1994, Burke registered the name “Rooibos” with the US Patent and Trademark Office.

As the use of Rooibos became more popular, Burke demanded that companies either pay fees for use of the name, or cease to use it. However, a public campaign highlighting South African interests resulted in the matter being settled out of court and Burke agreed to cancel its registration of the word Rooibos internationally.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Linda Daniels may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

Creative Commons License"South Africa Moves Toward New IP Policy; Rooibos Industry Seeks Protection" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: Features, IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, Africa, Enforcement, English, Regional Policy, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains, Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge

Trackbacks

  1. Global IP Debate Over Rooibos Intensifies As More Claims Surface | Intellectual Property Watch says:
    29/08/2013 at 4:33 pm

    […] Davies has previously confirmed to Intellectual Property Watch that geographical Indication (GI) status for rooibos is currently being sought in the European Union. But it will require securing GI status in South Africa first, something that is currently in the works (IPW, Developing Country Policy, 23 August 2013). […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.