• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Report Finds Stronger Regulation Spurs Chemical Innovation

26/02/2013 by Intellectual Property Watch 2 Comments

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

By Kelly Burke for Intellectual Property Watch

New research shows that more rigid laws regulating hazardous chemicals encourage innovation in both large and small companies, according to a report published by the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL).

The report, titled “Driving Innovation: How stronger laws help bring safer chemicals to market” [pdf], examined the impact of laws governing hazardous chemicals in terms of their effect on innovation, development, and adoption of alternatives. The report cites an increased number of patents filed for alternative chemicals every time there’s new chemical regulation as evidence of the innovation.

“Over-regulation … is seen as an old problem and there is a lot of truth in that,” Peter Droell, head of the European Commission Unit for Policy Development for Industrial Innovation, said in a CIEL release. “We are working to overcome it. But we also need to recognize that regulation can be a big driver of innovation.”

The report states that not only can increased legislation drive general innovation, but regulation will “spur the innovation of safer alternatives and can pull safer alternatives into the market.”

CIEL’s report provides a series of recommendations for policymakers such as: promoting access to information about chemical hazards; allowing government authorities the power to remove hazardous chemicals from the market; and crafting stronger treaties for a level playing field globally.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Creative Commons License"Report Finds Stronger Regulation Spurs Chemical Innovation" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP-Watch Briefs, IP Policies, Themes, Venues, Access to Knowledge/ Education, Biodiversity/Genetic Resources/Biotech, Development, Enforcement, English, Environment, Health & IP, Innovation/ R&D, North America, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets

Comments

  1. M.R.Srividya says

    28/02/2013 at 5:06 am

    I feel strict laws will not encourage more innovation, but allows quality product into the product. After all chemical innovation is only to make disease free world. Hence policies should be framed emphasising on human and environment safety rather than encouraging more innovations with less/no value.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. US Subcommittee Examines Toxic Substances Control Act, IP Protection | Intellectual Property Watch says:
    11/07/2013 at 9:32 pm

    […] A paper [pdf] submitted by the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), referenced in the hearing by a committee member, said the TSCA has further to go in properly balancing these interests. The paper also offered findings that stricter laws spur the innovation of safer chemical alternatives (IPW, US Policy, 26 February 2013). […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.