• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

Major Research Funders, Institutions Pledge Transparency In Clinical Trials

18/05/2017 by Intellectual Property Watch Leave a Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

More transparency on clinical trials is expected after major research funders, research institutions, and international health groups agreed that the research they fund or support will publicly release results of clinical trials.

According to a World Health Organization press release today, about 50 percent of clinical trials go unreported, “often because the results are negative.” This situation leads to an “incomplete and potentially misleading picture of the risks and benefits of vaccines, drugs, and medical devices, and can lead to use of suboptimal or even harmful products.”

In a joint statement signed by major research funders such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation pledged to “develop and implement a policy with mandated timeframes for prospective registration and public disclosure of the results of clinical trials that we fund, co-fund, sponsor or support.”

The signatories also include non-governmental organisations, such as Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF, Doctors Without Borders), and research centres, such as Institut Pasteur.

List of 12 signatories:

  • Indian Council of Medical Research
  • Research Council of Norway
  • UK Medical Research Council
  • Médecins Sans Frontières
  • Epicentre
  • CEPI
  • PATH
  • Institut Pasteur
  • Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi)
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Wellcome Trust

According to the statement, the current bias in the reporting of the results of clinical trials is expected to be reduced and will allow for more informed decisions in areas such as marketing authorisation, public health policy recommendation on use, and financing decisions by public procurement bodies and multilateral agencies.

The statement said that modest costs will be associated with public disclosure of clinical trial results. “The costs of disseminating the results of research are a minor component of the overall costs of conducting such research, and results reporting is an essential component of the research enterprise. The resource allocation, public health and scientific benefits – together with the need to meet ethical imperatives – far outweigh the costs,” it said.

According to the WHO press release, the agreement reached today follows a 2015 WHO position and ethical principles on public disclosure of results from clinical trials.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Creative Commons License"Major Research Funders, Institutions Pledge Transparency In Clinical Trials" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP-Watch Briefs, IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, English, Health & IP, Health Policy Watch, Innovation/ R&D, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, WHO

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Top Global Health stories

New WHO Director Tedros’s Opening Vision: People First

Enter The African Medicines Agency, Continent’s First Super-Regulator?

More health stories...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.