• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

WTO Inquiry Launched Into US Complaints Against China’s IP Record

27/09/2007 by Paul Garwood for Intellectual Property Watch 1 Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

By Paul Garwood
A World Trade Organization panel will formally investigate United States complaints that China has failed to adequately protect intellectual property rights on goods such as software and movies, a move criticised by Beijing.

WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) on 25 September established a panel following Washington’s second request to look into its allegations against China. Findings from the inquiry would not be released until late 2008, a WTO official said Thursday.

The United States is demanding China be tougher on prosecuting those who breach copyright or trademarks and implement stronger laws on what happens to confiscated pirated material. Washington claims Beijing’s apparent failure to clamp down adequately on intellectual property rights violations has facilitated the growth of one of the world’s largest sources of pirated products, ranging from clothes and sporting goods to drugs, CDs and DVDs.

“The United States recognises that China has made the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) a priority, and that China has taken active steps to improve IPR protection and enforcement,” US trade official Dan Hunter told the DSB. “The fact remains, however, that bilateral discussions on the specific matters described in the US panel request have not resulted in a mutually agreeable solution to our concerns.”

China hit back at the US panel request, describing it as “regrettable” that Washington had sought for the second time the panel’s establishment and vowing to defend its interests during the panel.

As allowed under WTO rules, China blocked Washington’s first request for a panel on 31 August. WTO rules stipulate that a second request leads automatically to the establishment of a panel, unless the complainant withdraws its proposal.

China alleges that the United States is trying to impose obligations beyond the WTO Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) on developing countries. It also cited TRIPS provisions that say countries can determine appropriate methods of implementing the agreement within national legal frameworks.

“While remaining confident that relevant measures of China are consistent with relevant WTO rules, we strongly oppose the US attempt to impose on developing members through this case extra obligation that goes beyond what has been prescribed in the agreement,” said a statement released by the Chinese delegation to the WTO.

The latest US complaint is the fifth it has levelled against Beijing and the third time it has sought the intervention of the DSB. China has also initiated a case against the US at the WTO over anti-dumping measures on paper imports from China.

The DSB panel process can take up to 15 months and comprises numerous stages that the parties must go through before any findings are released.

The first step is for consultations and mediation, which is prescribed to take 60 days to complete. This is followed by the setting up of the panel and appointment of its members, a 45 day process. Preparation and provision of the final panel report to the parties involved in the case takes six months, while three weeks is allotted for the same report to be circulated among WTO members. A further 60 days is set aside for the DSB to adopt the report if there is no appeal lodged. In the case of an appeal, a further three months of negotiations is expected to ensue.

Paul Garwood may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Creative Commons License"WTO Inquiry Launched Into US Complaints Against China’s IP Record" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: News, Copyright Policy, Enforcement, English, North America, Patents/Designs/Trade Secrets, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains, WTO/TRIPS

Trackbacks

  1. WTO Launches Probe On China Distribution; Reviews Thai IP Policies says:
    23/03/2015 at 10:34 am

    […] There is a separate IP-related case filed by the United States against China, WT/DS362/7, for which a panel was formed on 25 September. In it, the United States alleges China has failed to provide “criminal procedures and penalties to be applied in cases of wilful trademark counterfeiting or copyright piracy on a commercial scale that fail to meet certain thresholds” (IPW, WTO/TRIPS, 27 September 2007). […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.