<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Intellectual Property Watch</title>
	<link>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog</link>
	<description>IP Watch</description>
	<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 12:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.2.1</generator>

		<item>
		<title>Establecidos procedimientos de votación para designación del cargo a director general de la OMPI la próxima semana</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1034</link>
		<comments>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1034#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 12:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		
	<category>Español</category>
	<category>WIPO</category>
	<category>United Nations</category>		<guid>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1034</guid>
		<description>Por William New
Todo parece indicar que están listos los procedimientos finales para la tan importante designación del candidato al cargo de director general de la Organización Mundial de la Propiedad Intelectual (OMPI). 

El Comité de Coordinación de la OMPI, organismo ejecutivo de esta organización de Naciones Unidas e integrado por ...</description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://ip-watch.org/weblog/wp-commentsrss2.php?p=1034</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adoption de la procédure de nomination au poste de Directeur général de l&#8217;OMPI</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1033</link>
		<comments>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1033#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 11:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		
	<category>Français</category>
	<category>WIPO</category>
	<category>European Policy</category>		<guid>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1033</guid>
		<description>Par William New
Les règles de procédures applicables à la nomination, la semaine prochaine, du prochain Directeur général de l’Organisation mondiale de la Propriété intellectuelle (OMPI) semblent avoir été définitivement adoptées. 

Les 83 pays membres du Comité de coordination de l’OMPI, le comité exécutif de l’organisation, se réuniront le 13 mai ...</description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://ip-watch.org/weblog/wp-commentsrss2.php?p=1033</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>European Parliament Set To Reprimand Mandelson For Pressuring Thailand</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1032</link>
		<comments>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1032#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 06:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		
	<category>English</category>
	<category>Biodiversity/Genetic Resources/Biotech</category>
	<category>Public Health</category>
	<category>Human Rights</category>
	<category>Patent Policy</category>
	<category>WTO/TRIPS</category>
	<category>European Policy</category>
	<category>Developing Country Policy</category>
	<category>News</category>
	<category>Enforcement</category>		<guid>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1032</guid>
		<description>By David Cronin for Intellectual Property Watch
BRUSSELS - The European Parliament looks set to take Brussels’ top trade official to task over his latest attempt to persuade Thailand that it should revise its policy on pharmaceutical patents. 

Shortly after a new government was installed in Bangkok earlier this year, European ...</description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://ip-watch.org/weblog/wp-commentsrss2.php?p=1032</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voting Procedures Set for WIPO Director General Vote Next Week</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1031</link>
		<comments>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1031#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 14:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		
	<category>English</category>
	<category>WIPO</category>
	<category>United Nations</category>
	<category>News</category>		<guid>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1031</guid>
		<description>By William New
The final procedures appear to be in place for next week’s all-important nomination election for the next director general of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). 

The WIPO Coordination Committee, the 83-member government executive body of the UN organisation, will meet on 13 May to narrow 15 candidates ...</description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://ip-watch.org/weblog/wp-commentsrss2.php?p=1031</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proponents: ‘Time Is Now’ For TRIPS Biodiversity Amendment In Doha Round</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1030</link>
		<comments>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1030#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		
	<category>English</category>
	<category>Biodiversity/Genetic Resources/Biotech</category>
	<category>Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge</category>
	<category>Patent Policy</category>
	<category>Trademarks/Geographical Indications</category>
	<category>WTO/TRIPS</category>
	<category>News</category>		<guid>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1030</guid>
		<description>By William New
India and other proponents on Wednesday sought to counter concern raised by the World Trade Organization chief that a “clash” could occur if differences are not narrowed on a proposed amendment to WTO intellectual property rules for the protection of genetic resources and traditional knowledge. 

“There is a ...</description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://ip-watch.org/weblog/wp-commentsrss2.php?p=1030</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>People: Change Of IP Guard At US, Australia Missions; IFPMA Readies New Leader</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1029</link>
		<comments>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1029#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		
	<category>English</category>
	<category>WIPO</category>
	<category>United Nations</category>
	<category>WTO/TRIPS</category>
	<category>US Policy</category>
	<category>Subscribers</category>		<guid>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1029</guid>
		<description>In the People column: the US mission IP team is undergoing a complete transformation, while a former top US IP negotiator in Geneva returned last week in a biotech industry suit, and still another US negotiator appears poised to follow.

Please note: this article is password protected and only available for ...</description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://ip-watch.org/weblog/wp-commentsrss2.php?p=1029</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Support Mixed For US Orphan Works Bill As Issue Catches Global Attention</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1028</link>
		<comments>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1028#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 12:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		
	<category>English</category>
	<category>WIPO</category>
	<category>Access to Knowledge</category>
	<category>Education</category>
	<category>Copyright Policy</category>
	<category>US Policy</category>
	<category>European Policy</category>		<guid>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1028</guid>
		<description>By Dugie Standeford for Intellectual Property Watch
In an issue that may be rising internationally, legislation pending in the United States Senate and House to free up use of “orphan works” whose copyright owners cannot be found has won strong support from the recording, webcasting and library sectors but faces challenges ...</description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://ip-watch.org/weblog/wp-commentsrss2.php?p=1028</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>WHO IP And Health Group Concludes With Progress; Tough Issues Remain For Assembly</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1027</link>
		<comments>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1027#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 09:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		
	<category>English</category>
	<category>Biodiversity/Genetic Resources/Biotech</category>
	<category>Public Health</category>
	<category>Technical Cooperation/Technology Transfer</category>
	<category>Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge</category>
	<category>Access to Knowledge</category>
	<category>Human Rights</category>
	<category>Patent Policy</category>
	<category>Features</category>
	<category>WHO</category>		<guid>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1027</guid>
		<description>Note: The latest version of the draft strategy (dated Saturday, 3 May, 14.00h) is now available on the WHO website [click here].

By Kaitlin Mara and William New
The World Health Organization (WHO) negotiations on public health, intellectual property and innovation ended Saturday with substantial progress toward consensus on a draft strategy ...</description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://ip-watch.org/weblog/wp-commentsrss2.php?p=1027</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>May Edition of IP-Watch Monthly Reporter Now Available</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1026</link>
		<comments>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1026#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		
	<category>English</category>
	<category>Editorials</category>
	<category>Subscribers</category>		<guid>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1026</guid>
		<description>The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter features the most important news on international IP policymaking, the latest on who is coming and going in the IP community at the United Nations, World Trade Organization, Geneva missions, regional and national IP offices, industry and non-governmental organisations, plus News Briefs on reports ...</description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://ip-watch.org/weblog/wp-commentsrss2.php?p=1026</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>La protection des droits de propriété intellectuelle : une priorité pour le Représentant américain au commerce</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1025</link>
		<comments>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1025#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 19:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		
	<category>Français</category>
	<category>Public Health</category>
	<category>Access to Knowledge</category>
	<category>Human Rights</category>
	<category>Patent Policy</category>
	<category>Copyright Policy</category>
	<category>Trademarks/Geographical Indications</category>
	<category>WTO/TRIPS</category>
	<category>US Policy</category>
	<category>Enforcement</category>		<guid>http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1025</guid>
		<description>Par William New
Si le rapport publié chaque année par le gouvernement américain afin d’évaluer la manière dont les partenaires commerciaux étrangers protègent les droits de propriété intellectuelle des entreprises américaines et décourager les investissements dans les pays défaillants a une fois encore fustigé l’attitude de la Chine et la Russie, ...</description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://ip-watch.org/weblog/wp-commentsrss2.php?p=1025</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
