Login
You are not logged in.
Login | Subscribe

RSS feed 

What is RSS?

RSS (Really Simple Syndication) is an XML format of a web site or a weblog designed to allow the distribution and the sharing of information. An RSS feed or web feed provides headlines, brief descriptions and links to the full original content in a standard format.

More information is available on Wikipedia.

What is the benefit of using RSS feeds?

RSS is an easy way for you to be alerted when new content is posted on your chosen web sites, such as the Intellectual Property Watch website. Instead of visiting the IP-Watch website again and again to browse for new stories, the RSS feed automatically tells you when something new is posted.

What do I need to use RSS?

To start using RSS, you need a news reader or aggregator that displays RSS feeds from web sites or weblogs you selected. There are many different news readers, available as applications to be installed on your computer or as web services. Some web browsers such as Firefox and Safari can display RSS feeds too.

You can find a list on RSS Compendium.

Once you have set up your news reader, you simply subscribe to the RSS feeds you want.

How do I subscribe to the IP-Watch RSS feed?

Copy the URL of the IP-Watch RSS feed as provided in the left margin to your clipboard. Then follow the instructions on your particular news reader for adding / subscribing to RSS feeds.

Email alerts 

You can subscribe for free to receive automatic email notifications whenever new content is available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. Moreover, you can configure the alerts to fit your needs and interests by defining the frequency, the type of content and even the language.

Subscribe/free trial 

Intellectual Property Watch subscribers receive exclusive access to stories published on the website under password protection, plus the Intellectual Property Watch monthly edition, a 16-page selection of the most important stories and features, including the People column and News Briefs section not available anywhere else. These columns contain the latest on personnel changes in the international IP community, and items on IP policy news and reports from around the world. The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available online and in print, mailed to your door.


Global IP Policy in 2010:
What You Need To Know
IP-Watch Year Ahead Series

Advertise Here

Latest Comments
  • @Sam: These laws apply here in Canada...that is fo... »
  • Great move on open innovation and effort to help t... »
  • Inside Views

    Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea on any relevant topic to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch, or leave a comment within any piece such as below.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

    Copyright Law Reform in Brazil: Anteprojeto or Anti-project?

    A balancing of the rights of authors and consumers, the re-introduction of a private copying exception, a remixing permission and a new regulatory agency for copyright issues are among the core points the Brazilian Ministry of Culture has planned for the new copyright law. But at the Third Conference on Copyright and the Public Interest in São Paulo a month ago, the Ministry emphasised that the bits and pieces shown to the audience were not from an actual law draft (”anteprojeto”) but only a preliminary proposal for formulating such a draft. The bill still has not been published to date. The delay in releasing the bill for public consultation now threatens the work of more than two years on the reform.


    Take Two: China’s Proposed Regulations For Patent-Involving National Standards

    The Standards Administration of China patent policy proposal fails to strike the desired balance and undervalues the intellectual property included in a standard. If implemented as worded, it will discourage the contribution of innovative technologies for use in national standards and the participation of patent holders, writes George Willingmyre.


    22 February 2008

    Record Patent Filings Keep WIPO Revenues High; Audit, Budget Meetings Loom

    By William New
    The World Intellectual Property Organization may see significant revenues from its record high patent filings and it may be nearing agreement on a new budget designating how to spend it.

    WIPO’s Audit Committee is meeting this week, addressing concerns about oversight, staffing and new construction, and the General Assembly will be reconvened in late March to try to agree on the current year’s budget.

    Filings for international patents under WIPO’s Patent Cooperation Treaty increased 4.7 percent in 2007 to an estimated record total of 156,100 applications, according to WIPO. WIPO typically receives CHF1400 per application, with substantial discounts for least-developed countries and some in developing countries.

    The United States maintained its sizeable lead over the rest of the world in patent applications, followed by Japan, Germany, Korea, France, United Kingdom, China, Netherlands, Switzerland, Sweden, Italy, Canada, Australia, Finland and Israel. Korea (18.8 percent growth) and China (38.1 percent growth) each rose one place in the rankings, reflecting the continuing trend of highest growth occurring in northeast Asia.

    Filing a patent under the PCT makes it possible to seek protection of a patent in many countries with a single application. PCT fees account for about 75 percent of WIPO’s overall annual revenue of approximately $300 million, Gurry said.

    WIPO’s financial resources are “very positive,” he said. “While we have had a budget crisis, it is not a financial crisis.”

    The annual General Assemblies ended last October without agreement on a budget for the 2008-2009 biennium, in part because developed countries blocked it. Those countries sought to hold a discussion in the assembly on concerns about the WIPO director general, and also sought a reduction in patent fees - much of which are paid by developed country industry and individuals – commensurate with WIPO’s financial surplus.

    The United States and possibly other developed countries have resisted restarting budget talks, in part out of an apparent concern for putting new funds in the hands of the current administration. Director General Kamil Idris is scheduled to leave office next autumn, one year early.

    But agreement was reached recently to hold, on 31 March, a special session of the General Assembly to resume talks on the programme and budget. It may not be the last such meeting before agreement is struck. Initially, it was foreseen that the session would be brief, without a reopening of the debate, but it appears that one or more developed countries may wish to discuss details of how WIPO’s proposed budget may have changed in the nearly six months since the assemblies. Targets could be to reduce amounts designated for staffing or other administrative activities, sources said. Whether to cut patent fees also is expected to be discussed.

    Audit Committee and Construction Project

    The announcement of the positive PCT results was well-timed, as this week’s WIPO Audit Committee meeting, from 18 to 21 February, neared conclusion. This secret committee of about nine members, about which even the agenda is not public, has been addressing issues such as internal audit and oversight functions at WIPO, information and communications technologies, a desk-to-desk review that found significant room for improvement in staffing matters, and the construction of a large, new building on the vacant lot adjacent to WIPO headquarters.

    On the construction, member states previously agreed that this could proceed in the face of financial questions at WIPO in part because it would be cheaper than the rent paid to as many as 10 locations around the city where WIPO staff sit. The construction had been set for February of this year but got pushed to April, just after the scheduled special assembly meeting, perhaps by coincidence. The estimated cost of construction has been rising and now appears to be estimated at more than CHF150 million, up from the 2005 estimate of some CHF125 million, according to government sources and documents. The new figure appears to bring the total cost of the project (including land, consultant, interest, reserves for unforeseen expenses and so forth) to nearly CHF180 million.

    Large Loan Inconsistent with Budget Questions?

    But questions have been raised by some officials about a decision to allow WIPO to take a large loan, said to be $114 million, for the construction project, at a time when its handling of a few million Swiss francs within its budget is being challenged. In addition, questions are being raised over the granting of the construction work to a Swiss firm seemingly without sufficient transparency or competition for some governments’ taste.

    But a developed country official said the loan had already been approved before the questions on budgeting arose. Developed countries have taken the position that the budget holdup does not significantly impact WIPO’s operations. This was discussed, among other places, at an informal late January meeting with WIPO Comptroller Carlotta Graffigna and others on budgetary matters, according to government officials. But in that meeting, officials were said by one participant to have raised concerns for their programmes if the new budget were not approved.

    The report from the 3 to 6 December Audit Committee, WO/AC/7/2, obtained by Intellectual Property Watch, shows a good deal of dissension about the handling of internal auditing. “The committee finds it wholly unsatisfactory that, de facto, IAOD [Internal Audit and Oversight Division] is not functioning in accordance with its mandate, and the needs of the organisation, and will be unable to do so realistically for the foreseeable future,” the report said.

    The construction project falls under the responsibility of WIPO Deputy Director General Philippe Petit, who handles administrative matters and who is a declared candidate from France for the director general position to be filled later this year.

    IT, Desk-to-Desk Review

    On the separate issue of information technology within WIPO, it was said in the report that recent budgetary restrictions have meant that “the organisation’s ICT infrastructure has not kept pace with technological advances.” Passage of the 2007-2008 budget will allow investment but still may not be enough, it said.

    This issue was expected to be addressed in this week’s committee meeting under consideration of a proposed “enterprise resource planning” system which relates to the possible use of WIPO’s extensive financial reserves.

    Also at this week’s meeting, concerns about progress on staffing matters raised in the 2006 desk-to-desk employment review by independent consultant PricewaterhouseCoopers were to be discussed.

    The December committee report raised questions about the November 2007 establishment of an Organisational Improvement Programme Committee suggested by the consultant’s report, and whether “real progress” could be made on the committee until a new director general is appointed. But the committee said failure to make progress during this year “would have a negative impact on the organisation.”

    Also being addressed is the implementation of new financial regulations that insert member states more fully into the WIPO budgetary process.

    Record PCT Year

    Matsushita, a Japanese conglomerate concentrated on electronics, was the top filing company (2,100 applications) in 2007, overtaking Dutch electronics company Philips (2,041 applications), which had held first place at least since 2003, according to WIPO Deputy Director General Francis Gurry, who oversees patents. Both companies actually saw a decline in applications, but Philips’ decline was greater. Siemens (Germany), Huawei Technologies (China), Robert Bosch (Germany), Toyota (Japan), Qualcomm (US), Microsoft (US), Motorola (US) and Nokia (Finland) were the remaining top 10.

    Among developing countries, India (686 applications) and Brazil (384 applications) saw increases but Gurry said they could be expected to rise by larger amounts in the future. In India’s case, he suggested the relatively low number of applications might be related to its emphasis on innovation in economic areas such as software and services, which do not typically involve patents (software is more commonly protected by copyright).

    Areas receiving the most PCT applications were telecommunications (10.5 percent of the total), information technology (10.1 percent) and pharmaceuticals (9.3 percent). The fastest growing areas were nuclear engineering (24.5 percent increase) and telecommunications (15.5 percent increase).

    Speaking at a press conference, Gurry also said there appears to be a loose correlation between countries with few natural resources and countries that rely heavily on patenting.

    Gurry also said the patent system is moving increasingly to an electronic environment. Gurry also is a declared candidate for the WIPO director general position.

    William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.


    Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported  Print This Post Print This Post

    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.