SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Advertisement


Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Occupy IP: New Economy Businesses Clash With Old

It may be too much, too late for content providers finally trying to tame the internet, and a fresh approach is needed, writes Bruce Berman.




Special Reports

Non-Communicable Diseases Issue Energises Public Health Policymakers Read More >


Latest Comments
  • This is certainly a good move, but perhaps this is... »
  • Copyrights are unique works set in a concrete mode... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    US Transition: Latest IP News

    Official Technology & Innovation Platform: Obama/Biden

    23 October
    Kappos’ Early Days At USPTO: Many Changes, Few Funds

    3 September
    Punke Nominated As WTO Ambassador; Stoll To Succeed Doll As US Patent Commissioner

    29 July
    USPTO Nominee Kappos Appears To Clear First Senate Hurdle

    29 July
    Rumoured New US Ambassador To UN In Geneva A Major Obama Fundraiser

    27 May
    The Institute Of Medicine Of The National Academies Releases Report On “US Commitment to Global Health: Recommendations for the Public and Private Sectors”

    18 March
    US Senate Approves Ron Kirk As Trade Representative
    [pdf]

    14 March
    Margaret Hamburg Appointed Food and Drug Administration Commissioner


    Business Lobby On IP, US Commerce Secretary Nominee

    24 February
    Associated Press: Gary Locke, Former Governor of Washington, Likely Next Commerce Pick

    13 February

    Washington Post: First Commentary On Gregg’s Withdrawal

    Judd Gregg Ends Bid for Commerce Secretary Job Position (New York Times)

    9 February

    Iconic image of Obama sets off copyright law, Fair Use battle

    New Commerce Secretary Judd Gregg’s IP Record

    30 January
    Susan Davies, Former Chief Counsel For IP On The Senate Judiciary Committee, Named Associate Counsel To Obama

    27 January
    IP-Watch (for subscribers): Potential Names For Obama IP Team Swirl; WTO IP Chief “Imminent”

    Obama’s White House Policy On Copyright (credit to A2k@lists.essential.org)

    12 January
    Center for American Progress Report: Patent Reform 101, An Inefficient System Slows the Innovation Economy

    6 January
    CNet: Obama Taps RIAA Lawyer For Deputy Attorney General

    Computer & Communications Industry Association Recommendations for Patent and Trademark Office Transition [doc]

    Computer & Communications Industry Association Recommendations for National Institute of Standards and Technology [doc]

    Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) Ideas for Reform of US Patent and Trademark Office [pdf]

    26 December
    US IP Attachés Take Hard-Line Position On Overseas IP Enforcement

    Obama’s USTR choice won quick praise from the Motion Picture Association of America, US Chamber of Commerce and other IP industry groups.

    Reuters: Business in the dark on Obama trade pick

    12 December
    US Technology, IP Industries Offer Policy Wish Lists For Obama

    10 December
    Business Software Alliance, Other Software and Hardware Companies Send Letter To Obama Endorsing Chief Technology Officer
    Letter Text Available Here [pdf]

    8 December
    Financial Times: Obama weighs putting the wisdom of crowds to work

    2 December
    CNet: Obama’s attorney general pick: Good on privacy?

    Obama’s Transition Team Website, Change.gov, Under Creative Commons Licence

    14 November
    IP-Watch: US Elections, Global Economy Are Major Challenges For US IP Association

    IP-Watch: Doll Is New Deputy At USPTO; More Changes On The Way

    Wired: Net Neutrality Advocates In Charge Of Obama Team Review of Federal Communications Commission

    Wired: Obama Team Taps Venture Capitalist And Tech Company Execs To Organize Transition

    6 November
    IP-Watch: Who Will Advise Obama On IP? Let The Name Games Begin

    5 November
    IP-Watch: Obama Victory Draws Quick Reactions From IP, Tech Communities


    McCain/Palin Campaign Platform on Technology and Innovation

    31 October
    Berkman Center: The Risks Of A Digital Blindspot

    Computing Technology Industry Association (CompTIA): Information Technology Workers Prefer Obama, Unregulated Web; Mixed On IP Protection

    20 October
    Lawrence Lessig in NY Times: Copyright and Politics Don’t Mix

    Annenberg Research Network on International Communication: Campaign 2008: USC Annenberg Technology and Media Policy Watch

    16 October
    NY Times: If Elected, Rivals’ Visions Differ on Unleashing Innovation

    15 October
    Wired Magazine: YouTube to McCain: You Made Your DMCA Bed, Lie in It

    13 October
    McCain Campaign: “Overreaching Copyright” Silencing Political Speech on YouTube [pdf]

    2 October
    PC Mag: Biden Versus Palin: The Tech Debate

    Telecommunications Industry Association: Quick Guide To Candidates’ Technology Platforms

    29 September
    Universities Allied for Essential Medicines: Candidates Vow To Fight Against Neglected Diseases; Obama Campaign Promises To Ensure Low-Cost Drugs Available

    Candidates Give Their Views On ChinaObama On US-China Policy [pdf]McCain On US-China Policy [pdf]

    Science Debate 2008: Candidates Answer 14 Key Questions on Science and Innovation Policy

    17 September
    Wired: Obama Campaign Reveals Science Advisors

    11 September
    Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) Report On
    Candidates’ Technology And Innovation Policies
    [pdf]

    5 September
    IP-Watch:* US Presidential Candidates Prioritise IP Issues But Diverge On Details*

    Brand Protection Council: The IP Vote: McCain and Obama on Intellectual Property

    29 August
    Intellectual Property Policy and the Presidential Election: A Discussion on its Future by Leading Policy Advisors to the Candidates

    23 August
    CNET: Joe Biden’s pro-RIAA, pro-FBI tech voting record

    30 May
    IP-Watch: US Presidential Campaign Officials Talk ‘IP Tsars’ and Network Neutrality

    28 January
    IP-Watch: US Presidential Candidates Reveal Positions On Some IP Issues


    Print This Page Print This Page