SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments

For IPW Subscribers
A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

Monthly Reporter

The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


Innovation Trends

2011

2 February Europe Calls For Radical Change On Innovation; EU Patent In Works

28 January Innovation, Generic Drugs, Patents In Congress Follow Obama’s State of the Union Speech

22 January WHO R&D Financing Committee Approved With Controversial Industry Expert

11 January The 2011 Drug Patent ‘Cliff’ And The Evolution Of IP Valuation

2010

23 December US Industrial Policies, R&D, And The WTO’s Definition Of Non-Actionable Subsidies

6 December WHO Members Again Attempt Global Plan Against Pandemics

19 October WHO Moves IP, Innovation Out Of Director General’s Office

14 October WHO Report: Progress On Neglected Tropical Diseases

1 October First Patent Holder Grants Licences To UNITAID

16 September Economists Report Empirical Evidence Of TRIPS Impact On Developing Countries

15 September China Defies Global Trend In Patent and Trademark Applications, WIPO Says

27 July The WHO’s Complex Path On Counterfeiting, R&D Financing, Pandemics

16 July OECD Sees New Angle On Innovation For Growth, Social Challenges

8 June New Rwanda IP Policy Taps Information For Development

27 May Knowledge-Building, Strong National Policies Essential For Development, Authors Say

21 May Conference Debates Strategic Patenting, Innovation & Public Health

20 April Open Source Company Alleges IBM Antitrust; IBM Requests Analysis

1 April Unbiased HIV Patent Pool: A Free-Market, Middle-Income Countries Open Model

31 March Pointed Exchange Of Views At WHO Briefing On Counterfeit Drugs

29 January Panel: Standards Aid Innovation, But Only If Open

2009

2 December New Classification Scheme For Clean Energy Patents To Facilitate Technology Transfer

19 November Special Report: IP Protection Secondary To Support For Small African Innovators

19 October Spurring Local Innovation In Africa By Improving Access To Information

14 October ITU Panels: Innovation Makes ICTs A Moving Landscape; IP Dispute Resolution Rising

13 October Development Agenda Conference: WIPO Can Enable Fair Technology Transfer

16 September Technology Transfer Will Be Part Of Copenhagen Climate Deal

28 July OECD: Tech R&D, Innovation Hard-Hit By Economy, But May Be Turning Up

20 July Innovation Policy Needs National Focus, Use Of TRIPS Obligations, Panellists Say

6 July Collaborative Innovation And ICTs Could Give Economy Back Its Colours

26 June Prevent Patents Inhibiting Knowledge Diffusion For Green Technology, EU Told

22 June Global Health Governance on Innovations in Global Health in the New Political Era

18 June Financial Crisis Provides Opportunity, Pitfalls For Green Innovation

16 June OECD Report: Innovation Focus Needed In Economic Crisis


Print This Page Print This Page