SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

WHO Should Have The Evidence? Ben Goldacre Refutes WHO Director’s Claim

“Bad Science” adversary and journalist, Dr Ben Goldacre, this week challenged WHO Director of Ethics and Social Determinants of Health, Dr Rüdiger Krech, on his understanding of published evidence.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    WTO/TRIPS

    21/09/2012: WTO Raises Attention To Multilateralism
    21/09/2012: Inside Views: Medals, Models And Moguls
    31/08/2012: Protection Of Geographical Indications In Russia: Is Russian Vodka A Protected GI?
    30/08/2012: NGOs Oppose US Proposal On Copyright For Trans-Pacific Trade Deal
    15/08/2012: WHO Hopes For “Domino Effect” Of Australian Ruling In Favour Of Tobacco Plain Packaging
    27/07/2012: Next WTO Ministerial To Be Held In Bali In December 2013
    23/07/2012: Inside Views: Access To Medicines And Intellectual Property In Jordan
    18/07/2012: Dominican Republic Files WTO Case Over Australian Tobacco Packaging
    12/07/2012: Special Report: Russia Amends IP Law In Advance Of WTO Accession
    04/07/2012: US Proposes 3-Step Test For Copyright Exceptions In Trans-Pacific Trade Talks
    25/06/2012: Rio+20 Climate Talks Finish With Little IP; Flexibilities Under Fire
    20/06/2012: WHO Paper: How To Guard Against Tobacco Companies – And Trade Law
    19/06/2012: WTO Review Provides Update On China’s IP Rise
    15/06/2012: UNCTAD Report Sees Sustainable African Growth In IP Flexibilities
    06/06/2012: Discussion On Counterfeits With A Flavour Of Rum At WTO TRIPS Council
    01/06/2012: Asian Governments Plan To Better Use TRIPS Flexibilities For Health
    15/05/2012: 15 Years Later, Prospects For WTO Information Technology Agreement Examined
    14/05/2012: Amid “Korean Wave,” South Korea Opens IP Office In The Philippines
    01/05/2012: Industry Report On Trade Secret Theft, Congressional Demand For IP Protection, As US-China Meet
    01/05/2012: Some Major Trading Partners Are Biggest IP Violators, USTR Says
    23/04/2012: “Entrenched Anti-Consumer Bias” Found In Copyright Laws; Creators Launch Petition For Better Contracts
    15/04/2012: Is ACTA Dying And Are G8 Countries Reacting To Its Impending Death?
    04/04/2012: Honduras Files WTO Dispute Case Vs. Australia Over Tobacco IPR
    28/03/2012: Novartis India Challenge Postponed To July
    23/03/2012: New Chair For WTO GI Register Talks Seeks New Ideas
    22/03/2012: WHO Head Urges Global Support For Australia In Fight Against Tobacco
    20/03/2012: WTO Special Session On GI Register Meets This Week
    16/03/2012: Global Business Stands Up For Multilateral Trade At WTO
    14/03/2012: Ukraine WTO Trademark Dispute Vs. Australia Tests Public Health Measures
    12/03/2012: India Grants First Compulsory Licence, For Bayer Cancer Drug
    29/02/2012: ACTA Debated At WTO; Petitions And Letters Fly In Brussels
    28/02/2012: Australian Tobacco Law May Head To WTO Dispute As TRIPS Council Meets
    24/02/2012: The Pulse Of IP In International Pharma Today
    12/02/2012: US, WIPO Training Programme On IP Rights In Africa Comes Under Fire
    30/01/2012: Geographical Indications Register Gains Ground Outside WTO
    26/01/2012: Officials, Industry Discuss IPR In Relation To Economy And Society
    20/01/2012: Book Calls For Re-Casting Debate Over TRIPS And Medicines Access
    11/01/2012: Book: Shape Up International Reforms To Address Food Security
    03/01/2012: Most-Read IP-Watch Posts Of 2011 Tell Story Of International IP Policymaking
    21/12/2011: IP Experts Focus On 3-Step Test In Copyright, Discuss Way Forward
    19/12/2011: As Multilateralism Comes Into Question, WTO Trade Ministers Extend Deadlines
    16/12/2011: Russia’s WTO Accession Hailed As Sign Of Commitment To Multilateralism
    14/12/2011: Issues Of Interest To IP Community Abound At WTO Ministerial
    13/12/2011: Taiwan Looks To Join ACTA
    13/12/2011: Inside Views: Out Of A Dilemma: Banning The Non-Violation Clause Under TRIPS
    01/12/2011: WTO General Council Extends Deadline For TRIPS Health Amendment
    24/11/2011: IP, Trade And Public Health Leaders Turn A Page In History Together
    22/11/2011: Doha+10: MSF Asks, What’s Next For TRIPS And Health?
    17/11/2011: WTO Ministers Asked To Send Message On TRIPS Extension For LDCs
    17/11/2011: WTO, WHO, WIPO To Discuss TRIPS And Health Declaration
    Your IP address is 54.234.231.49