SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • This is a good summary, except just to clarify one... »
  • Ellen 't Hoen will be a hard act to follow. She p... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    WTO/TRIPS

    15/05/2012: 15 Years Later, Prospects For WTO Information Technology Agreement Examined
    14/05/2012: Amid “Korean Wave,” South Korea Opens IP Office In The Philippines
    01/05/2012: Industry Report On Trade Secret Theft, Congressional Demand For IP Protection, As US-China Meet
    01/05/2012: Some Major Trading Partners Are Biggest IP Violators, USTR Says
    23/04/2012: “Entrenched Anti-Consumer Bias” Found In Copyright Laws; Creators Launch Petition For Better Contracts
    15/04/2012: Is ACTA Dying And Are G8 Countries Reacting To Its Impending Death?
    04/04/2012: Honduras Files WTO Dispute Case Vs. Australia Over Tobacco IPR
    28/03/2012: Novartis India Challenge Postponed To July
    23/03/2012: New Chair For WTO GI Register Talks Seeks New Ideas
    22/03/2012: WHO Head Urges Global Support For Australia In Fight Against Tobacco
    20/03/2012: WTO Special Session On GI Register Meets This Week
    16/03/2012: Global Business Stands Up For Multilateral Trade At WTO
    14/03/2012: Ukraine WTO Trademark Dispute Vs. Australia Tests Public Health Measures
    12/03/2012: India Grants First Compulsory Licence, For Bayer Cancer Drug
    29/02/2012: ACTA Debated At WTO; Petitions And Letters Fly In Brussels
    28/02/2012: Australian Tobacco Law May Head To WTO Dispute As TRIPS Council Meets
    24/02/2012: The Pulse Of IP In International Pharma Today
    12/02/2012: US, WIPO Training Programme On IP Rights In Africa Comes Under Fire
    30/01/2012: Geographical Indications Register Gains Ground Outside WTO
    26/01/2012: Officials, Industry Discuss IPR In Relation To Economy And Society
    20/01/2012: Book Calls For Re-Casting Debate Over TRIPS And Medicines Access
    11/01/2012: Book: Shape Up International Reforms To Address Food Security
    03/01/2012: Most-Read IP-Watch Posts Of 2011 Tell Story Of International IP Policymaking
    21/12/2011: IP Experts Focus On 3-Step Test In Copyright, Discuss Way Forward
    19/12/2011: As Multilateralism Comes Into Question, WTO Trade Ministers Extend Deadlines
    16/12/2011: Russia’s WTO Accession Hailed As Sign Of Commitment To Multilateralism
    14/12/2011: Issues Of Interest To IP Community Abound At WTO Ministerial
    13/12/2011: Taiwan Looks To Join ACTA
    13/12/2011: Inside Views: Out Of A Dilemma: Banning The Non-Violation Clause Under TRIPS
    01/12/2011: WTO General Council Extends Deadline For TRIPS Health Amendment
    24/11/2011: IP, Trade And Public Health Leaders Turn A Page In History Together
    22/11/2011: Doha+10: MSF Asks, What’s Next For TRIPS And Health?
    17/11/2011: WTO Ministers Asked To Send Message On TRIPS Extension For LDCs
    17/11/2011: WTO, WHO, WIPO To Discuss TRIPS And Health Declaration
    16/11/2011: Least-Developed Nations Propose Extension Of Deadline To Join TRIPS
    10/11/2011: Russian WTO Accession Will Bring Powerhouse Under TRIPS Immediately
    31/10/2011: US Elected Officials: IP Rights, Tech Markets Key For Russian WTO Accession
    27/10/2011: Inside Views: Plurilateral Trade Agreements Lack Protections for Users, Intermediaries
    26/10/2011: IP Enforcement Tensions At WTO; Health Amendment Extended Again
    23/10/2011: WTO IP Committee Addresses Medicines Access, Plain-Packaged Tobacco, ACTA
    18/10/2011: WTO Trains Officials On TRIPS Flexibilities For Public Health
    14/10/2011: Inside Views: Trade And Access To Medicines: Things The WTO Should Consider
    14/10/2011: Trading Knowledge As A Public Good: A Proposal For The WTO
    13/10/2011: US IP Rights Holders Hail New FTAs With Colombia, Panama, Korea
    10/10/2011: With WTO Stalled, GI Industry Proponents Move To Create Their Own Register
    06/10/2011: Inside Views: South Africa: TK Legislation In The New Tradition
    04/10/2011: As Bilateral Trade Deals Proceed, WIPO Hears Warnings, Calls For Change
    03/10/2011: White & Case Expanding WTO Practice In Geneva
    22/09/2011: A Call To Update Trade Policy Apps In The Internet Era
    15/09/2011: Experts Still Divided On Influence Of IP On Biodiversity Conservation