SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

WHO Should Have The Evidence? Ben Goldacre Refutes WHO Director’s Claim

“Bad Science” adversary and journalist, Dr Ben Goldacre, this week challenged WHO Director of Ethics and Social Determinants of Health, Dr Rüdiger Krech, on his understanding of published evidence.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    US Policy

    12/02/2013: Letter Shows US Pressure On Global Fund For Compulsory Licensing, Generics
    12/02/2013: Year Ahead In IP, Biotech, Biodiversity: A Trio Fuelling Debates, Opportunities In 2013
    08/02/2013: US Justice Department Reaches Settlement In E-Books Case
    08/02/2013: Fate Of Google Book Search Still To Come, Expert Says
    05/02/2013: Expiring GMO Patents Raise Regulatory Issues; Private Sector Takes Measures
    04/02/2013: Upcoming Law Summit To Address IP Management, Enforcement
    04/02/2013: Push For EU-US FTA Could Restart Discussions About IPRs
    27/01/2013: Tech Industry Report Finds Entertainment Industry Thriving Despite Complaints
    23/01/2013: Google Report Shows Steady Rise In Government Surveillance
    23/01/2013: US Trade Representative Ron Kirk To Depart In February
    18/01/2013: US FTC Finds Sharp Rise In ‘Pay-For-Delay’ Deals Blocking Generics
    17/01/2013: The Big Shift: A Look At Key Issues In International Copyright In 2013
    17/01/2013: US Senate Judiciary Committee 2013 Agenda Includes Privacy, Press Freedom
    15/01/2013: Company Takes A Fair Shot At Facebook, LinkedIn, With Social Networking Patents
    11/01/2013: After A Tough 2012, IP Owners In US Face An Uncertain 2013
    09/01/2013: US Issues Statement On Injunctions In Cases Of Standards Essential Patents
    09/01/2013: IP-Watch Looks At The Year Ahead In International IP Policy
    30/12/2012: Most-Read IP-Watch Stories Of 2012: India Pharma, Europe, ACTA, WIPO Technical Assistance, Gene Patents
    21/12/2012: US Supreme Court Poised To Rule Human Genes Are Not Patentable
    17/12/2012: US Chamber Holds Annual IP Attaché Roundtable, Announces New “IP Index”
    06/12/2012: US Congress Passes Act Implementing Patent Law Treaties
    03/12/2012: Video Available Of Event On Standards-Essential Patents
    29/11/2012: US Ambassador On WCIT: “ITU Is Not The Problem”
    26/11/2012: USPTO Director Kappos To Depart In January
    21/11/2012: Overseas Manufacturing Creates Copyright Dilemma For US Supreme Court
    07/11/2012: Could US Election Result Reverse Ever-Stronger Copyright Protection?
    07/11/2012: Film Industry Praises Obama’s “Understanding” Of IP’s Importance
    01/11/2012: US Makes New Exemptions To Digital Millennium Copyright Act Provision
    22/10/2012: Greens Call For ‘Social Contract For Digital Age’; Lessig Calls US Hopeless On Copyright Reform
    19/10/2012: US Court Rules On Fair Use For Blind Users, Digitisation, Amid Treaty Talks
    18/10/2012: New USPTO Post-Grant Review A Small Step For Patent Harmonisation
    16/10/2012: Standards-Setting Organisations Increasingly Make IPR A Priority
    15/10/2012: Global Fund Nears Selection Of New Director For Transformed Organisation
    05/10/2012: Google, Publishers Reach Digital Library Settlement
    04/10/2012: US Announces $2.4M In Local Grants To Combat IP Theft
    27/09/2012: IP And The White House: What Happens With IP Issues After The US Presidential Election?
    27/09/2012: Google’s Neutrality Stance Tested Yet Again In Brazil
    24/09/2012: UN Sanctions Committee Finds No Violation In WIPO Shipments To North Korea
    21/09/2012: Copyright Industry Hard-Hitter Fritz Attaway Retires
    20/09/2012: US And UN Consider New Limits On Patent Wars
    19/09/2012: Inside Views: Patently Wrong – The Jury’s Verdict In Apple v. Samsung
    13/09/2012: America Invents Act: Another Piece Of Patent Reform Puzzle Falls Into Place
    13/09/2012: US Ambassador Sees Hope For WIPO Visually Impaired Treaty This Year
    08/09/2012: Inside Views: The Contributions Of Julian Assange To The Debate On Intellectual Property
    06/09/2012: Licensing Executives Society (U.S.A. & Canada), Inc. Annual Meeting – Special Savings for IP-Watch Readers!
    04/09/2012: US Film Industry (Also) Likes Democrats’ Platform On IP And Internet Freedom
    30/08/2012: US Film Industry Praises Republicans On IP And Internet Freedom
    29/08/2012: Public Library Must Provide Accessible E-Readers Under US Law
    29/08/2012: Revolving Door: US Copyright General Counsel Joins Music Industry
    17/08/2012: Isolated DNA Declared Patentable By US Court Of Appeals
    Your IP address is 107.22.156.205