SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

How Listing Ukraine As A Priority Foreign Country In Special 301 Violates WTO Agreements

Prof. Sean Flynn asks whether US sanctions of Ukraine under the US Special 301 program violates World Trade Organization rules. He also asks whether the operation of watch lists threatening sanctions for intellectual property matters could be challenged under the WTO even prior to any sanction going into effect.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    US Policy

    20/05/2013: After Court Ruling, US Still In Disarray On Software Patents
    13/05/2013: US Supreme Court Rules In Favour Of Monsanto In Patent Exhaustion Case
    08/05/2013: US Senate Committee Evaluates US Cyber Threat Response Efforts
    07/05/2013: Joint Task Force Formed On Global Networked Media
    03/05/2013: US Study Calls For Objective Data To Inform Review Of Copyright Policy
    29/04/2013: IP-Watch Readers Save $200 On LES Spring Meeting, 14-16 May In Seattle
    23/04/2013: US Supreme Court May Invalidate Gene Patents, But Create Little Change
    18/04/2013: US Digital Public Library Launches Free Online Access
    11/04/2013: Reports: Obama’s Proposed 2014 Budget Favours Patent Office, R&D, Generic Drugs
    05/04/2013: North American Universities Seen Failing To Promote Socially Responsible Licensing
    04/04/2013: US Trade Office Calls For Comments On Transatlantic Trade Deal
    02/04/2013: Obama Announces Multi-Million Dollar Research Initiative To Study Human Brain
    01/04/2013: US Court Rules TV Streaming Service Does Not Violate Copyright Law
    28/03/2013: Report Analyses Fast-Track Green Patent Applications
    27/03/2013: Former US Congressman Howard Berman Joins Lobbying Firm
    27/03/2013: Inside Views: Why So Many Patent Filings Were Filed In The US On Or Before 15 March 2013
    26/03/2013: US Justice Dept. Praises IPXI Patent Exchange, But Not Yet Resolved
    26/03/2013: United States Chided As TRIPS Scofflaw At WTO
    25/03/2013: Comparison Of US, EU Treaties Highlights Differences On ISP Liability
    25/03/2013: Global Fund Receives USD 1.65B From US Congress; Names New Board Leadership
    25/03/2013: Diverging Views On IPR Protection Needs In Africa Emerge At IP Workshop
    23/03/2013: US Supreme Court To Hear Arguments On Pay-For-Delay Drug Deals
    22/03/2013: Conference Addresses Current Issues For Corporate IP Counsel
    21/03/2013: US Objective For EU-US FTA: Elevate IPR Enforcement
    20/03/2013: At US-Led Workshop, African Stakeholders Call For “Home Grown IP Agenda”
    19/03/2013: US Supreme Court Applies First Sale Doctrine Worldwide
    19/03/2013: Samsung Lawyer Assesses IP Legal Battle With Apple
    18/03/2013: Nearly 50 Groups Demand IPRs Out Of EU-US FTA
    18/03/2013: ICANN advierte a EE.UU. de no socavar el Modelo Multisectorial
    14/03/2013: US Perspectives: US Tries Gentler Copyright Enforcement
    14/03/2013: USTR: IPRs Among “Most Challenging” Issues As TPP Talks Accelerate
    12/03/2013: Meetings On IP And Innovation In Africa Open In Tanzania
    12/03/2013: World Congress Hosts 5th Annual Corporate IP Counsel Forum
    08/03/2013: US Defender Of Internet Freedom, Keen On Protecting IP Rights
    06/03/2013: Intellectual Ventures Reaches Another Semiconductor Patent Settlement
    06/03/2013: US Report: Foreign-Owned Firms Dominate IP Industries
    05/03/2013: “Works For Hire” A Key Issue As Music Stars Begin Terminating Copyright Transfers
    05/03/2013: Monsanto v. Bowman: Stocktaking After Supreme Court Hearings
    28/02/2013: Coalition Asks US Congress For Action On “Patent Trolls”
    26/02/2013: Obama Administration Announces New Open Access Policy
    26/02/2013: Report Finds Stronger Regulation Spurs Chemical Innovation
    25/02/2013: Web-Based IP Assessment Tool Gets Update From USPTO
    21/02/2013: Google’s Anti-Piracy Measures Not Enough, Recording Industry Says
    18/02/2013: Patent Outsourcing May Harm US Economy
    18/02/2013: Monsanto, Myriad: Two US Legal Cases Shaking Biotech Industries
    15/02/2013: Obama Takes Swipe At Patent Trolls In Call For Further Reform
    13/02/2013: USPTO Finalises Rules For ‘First-Inventor-To-File’ System Switch
    13/02/2013: President Obama Calls For Dramatic Increase In R&D, Major Trade Deals
    12/02/2013: Report Finds Average US Patent Cost US$ 374,000 In 2012
    12/02/2013: Intellectual Ventures Sues Internet Providers For DSL Patent Infringement
    Your IP address is 79.171.81.123