SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • This is a good summary, except just to clarify one... »
  • Ellen 't Hoen will be a hard act to follow. She p... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    US Policy

    18/05/2012: US Licensing Experts: Innovation Is Still Happening, Let’s Help It Along
    10/05/2012: Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation
    08/05/2012: INTA: Corporate Call To Action On New Domains, Social Media, Counterfeiting
    03/05/2012: Viacom v. YouTube: Chipping Away At The DMCA
    02/05/2012: Eben Moglen’s Warning: Beware Of Media Consuming You
    01/05/2012: Industry Report On Trade Secret Theft, Congressional Demand For IP Protection, As US-China Meet
    01/05/2012: Music Industry Groups Await Judgment On Breakthrough Royalty Agreement
    01/05/2012: Lines Of Geographical Indications Debate Begin To Take Shape In The United States
    01/05/2012: Some Major Trading Partners Are Biggest IP Violators, USTR Says
    27/04/2012: Global Internet Governance: From Multistakeholder To Autopilot
    26/04/2012: Day Marked By Initiatives On The Benefits Of IP, Open Technology
    25/04/2012: US State Dept. Funds 12 IP Protection Projects Worldwide
    24/04/2012: Global Internet Conference Opens With An Air Of Possibility
    18/04/2012: US Government Re-Issues Call For Bids To Manage Internet Root Zone
    13/04/2012: US Supreme Court Edges Toward Reviewing Extent Of GMO Patents
    12/04/2012: US Government Report: IP Boon To US Economy, Accounts For 40 Million Jobs
    05/04/2012: Court Issues Decision On Intermediary Liability In Viacom v. YouTube
    05/04/2012: After Mayo, Is Patent Law More Restrictive In US Than Europe?
    05/04/2012: Intellectual Property Strategy: A Wise Man’s Guide
    02/04/2012: US Trade Barriers Report Signals Work Ahead
    02/04/2012: Second Annual US IP Enforcement Report Shows Extensive Efforts At Home And Abroad
    27/03/2012: US Supreme Court Reverses Myriad Decision Allowing Gene Patents
    21/03/2012: US Supreme Court Narrows Patentable Subject Matter
    19/03/2012: US Group Creates Social Platform To Lobby For And Create Internet Reforms
    15/03/2012: More Foreigners Find Themselves Targets Of US Copyright Law
    13/03/2012: US Aims To Boost Its Efforts Against Overseas Infringers
    12/03/2012: Costa Rican President Tells ICANN Of Concern Over Internet Restrictions
    11/03/2012: US Government Scuttles Plan To Share Control Of The Internet
    08/03/2012: Paper: States Need To Be Cautious With Internet Intermediary Liability
    07/03/2012: Berlin Court Rules Facebook Violates User Rights
    07/03/2012: US Congressman Posts ACTA For Open Debate
    05/03/2012: Internet Governance In 2012: Reaching New Heights Or Hitting A Wall
    27/02/2012: Inside Views: ‘Balanced’ Copyright: Not A Magic Solving Word
    26/02/2012: US, WIPO IP Summit In Africa Postponed
    21/02/2012: Special Report: TPP Negotiations To Heat Up In Melbourne Over Patents, Copyright, Medicines
    13/02/2012: Obama’s Proposed Budget Raises R&D, Innovation Spending
    13/02/2012: Microsoft Says It Will Not Act On Patents In Standards
    12/02/2012: US, WIPO Training Programme On IP Rights In Africa Comes Under Fire
    10/02/2012: US Copyright Industries Call For Action On Piracy; NGOs Call For Scrutiny
    08/02/2012: In 2012: Are Biotech, Ethics And Biodiversity Friends or Foes?
    07/02/2012: Groups Call On Congress To Step Back From SOPA-Style Legislation
    02/02/2012: Will The Old Music Industry Giants Be Exchanged For New Ones?
    01/02/2012: WIPO Report Shows Strong Economic Contribution Of Copyright
    25/01/2012: Obama Announces New Trade Enforcement Unit With IP Focus
    23/01/2012: SOPA, Piracy, Pharmaceuticals May Dominate US IP Policy Discussions In 2012
    21/01/2012: US Cracks Down On Download Sites In Midst Of Anti-Piracy Debate
    20/01/2012: Occupy IP: New Economy Businesses Clash With Old
    20/01/2012: US Senate Postpones PIPA Vote; EU Commissioner Joined Opposition
    19/01/2012: SOPA Blackout Was Biggest Online Protest In History, Backers Say
    19/01/2012: FAQ: What SOPA Would Mean To You