SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

How Listing Ukraine As A Priority Foreign Country In Special 301 Violates WTO Agreements

Prof. Sean Flynn asks whether US sanctions of Ukraine under the US Special 301 program violates World Trade Organization rules. He also asks whether the operation of watch lists threatening sanctions for intellectual property matters could be challenged under the WTO even prior to any sanction going into effect.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    United Nations

    12/11/2012: Next Global Fund Director To Be Chosen From Four Candidates This Week
    09/11/2012: UN Joint Inspection Unit Launches New Website
    08/11/2012: Multi-Stakeholder Discussions á la Internet Governance Forum For WIPO?
    07/11/2012: Pirate Party Rep Tells UN Meeting: “F*** You, This Is My Culture!”
    05/11/2012: UPOV Hails Benefits of Plant Variety Protection; Civil Society Frustrated
    04/11/2012: UN Internet Governance Forum Looks At Human Rights, New Domains, Who’s In Charge
    02/11/2012: South-South Collaboration Needs Promotion, Better Reach, UNCTAD Report Says
    29/10/2012: UPOV Council To Formalise Access To Documents; Civil Society Seeks Greater Participation
    24/10/2012: Inside Views: In Search of Relevance, Not Solutions: The Truth About ITU’s ‘Patent Roundtable’
    23/10/2012: Horticultural Breeders Call For Stronger Protection Of Innovations
    22/10/2012: UN: Governments To Double Biodiversity Funding, Push Access/Benefit-Sharing
    19/10/2012: Sources: European Telecom Operators’ Proposals Run Aground At WCIT
    17/10/2012: More Production Not The Way To Sustainable Agriculture, UN Study Says
    16/10/2012: Standards-Setting Organisations Increasingly Make IPR A Priority
    15/10/2012: Civil Society Network Issues Proposals On Climate Change And IPRs
    15/10/2012: Global Fund Nears Selection Of New Director For Transformed Organisation
    12/10/2012: UN High-Level Meeting In India On Biodiversity Addresses Access And Benefit-Sharing
    12/10/2012: ITU Undertakes Work On Standards Essential Patents
    05/10/2012: India Ratifies Nagoya Protocol On Biodiversity Access And Benefit-Sharing
    26/09/2012: Agricultural Innovation Needed In Africa, With Farmers’ Participation, WTO Panellists Say
    26/09/2012: UN Clears WIPO Shipments To Iran
    24/09/2012: UN Sanctions Committee Finds No Violation In WIPO Shipments To North Korea
    24/09/2012: A Look At Who’s Who In Geneva IP Policymaking And Beyond
    20/09/2012: US And UN Consider New Limits On Patent Wars
    18/09/2012: ITU’s Line Of Defence On WCIT
    11/09/2012: Public Not Eager To Be Consulted By ITU On Telecom Regs
    10/09/2012: Chinese Official Gains Oversight Of UN Internet Governance Forum
    23/07/2012: US Congressional Committee Urged To Invite WIPO Staff Involved In Computer Shipments
    20/07/2012: WIPO’s Gurry Discusses Iran/North Korea; Denies Whistleblower Retaliation
    19/07/2012: WIPO Announces New Policy On Assistance To North Korea, Iran
    16/07/2012: ITU Cautious On Transparency Of New Telecom Regulations
    12/07/2012: Enhanced Cooperation Task Force For Internet Governance?
    10/07/2012: New CBD Head: IPR Still Key To Nagoya Protocol On Access And Benefit-Sharing
    09/07/2012: “Landmark” Global Commission On HIV And Law Report Tough On IP System
    09/07/2012: UN Human Rights Council Tackles IPRs, Benefits Of Scientific Progress
    06/07/2012: ITU To Hold High-Level Talks On “Innovation-Stifling, Rampant” Patent Litigation
    05/07/2012: New UN Human Rights Council Resolution On Internet Rights
    03/07/2012: Nagoya Protocol Access & Benefit-Sharing Meeting Kicks Off In New Delhi
    02/07/2012: UN Drugs And Crime Office Open To Private Donations To Fight Counterfeits
    02/07/2012: WHO Report Details Accountability In Director Chan’s First Term
    25/06/2012: Rio+20 Climate Talks Finish With Little IP; Flexibilities Under Fire
    23/06/2012: ITU Tries To Send A Clearer Signal On Global Telecom Talks
    22/06/2012: Internet Freedom At Home: Governments, Companies Need Accountability, Speakers Say
    20/06/2012: UN Non-Takeover Of The Net: ITU’s Touré Calls For Documents To Be Public
    20/06/2012: Former WIPO Director Idris Reported Arrested In Sudan
    20/06/2012: Near-Final Draft Of Rio+20 Outcome Document Shows Likely Commitments
    18/06/2012: Rio+20 Conference Opens With IP, Tech Transfer, Underlying Debate
    15/06/2012: UNCTAD Report Sees Sustainable African Growth In IP Flexibilities
    15/06/2012: Global Broadband Commission Urges G20 To Act For Development
    04/06/2012: ITU: More Transparency On World Conference On Telecommunications?
    Your IP address is 54.234.231.49