SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

How Listing Ukraine As A Priority Foreign Country In Special 301 Violates WTO Agreements

Prof. Sean Flynn asks whether US sanctions of Ukraine under the US Special 301 program violates World Trade Organization rules. He also asks whether the operation of watch lists threatening sanctions for intellectual property matters could be challenged under the WTO even prior to any sanction going into effect.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    European Policy

    18/01/2013: EPO Sees Record Patent Filings, Grants
    17/01/2013: The Big Shift: A Look At Key Issues In International Copyright In 2013
    16/01/2013: Business’ Privileged Access To EU-India Trade Documents
    10/01/2013: Reform Of EU Data Protection – Largest EU Lobbying Campaign Ever?
    10/01/2013: EPO Staff To Get Disputed €28M Bonus, Despite Protest
    09/01/2013: IP-Watch Looks At The Year Ahead In International IP Policy
    30/12/2012: Most-Read IP-Watch Stories Of 2012: India Pharma, Europe, ACTA, WIPO Technical Assistance, Gene Patents
    20/12/2012: European Human Rights Court: Internet Restriction Violates Freedom Of Expression
    15/12/2012: IP Rockstar Says: IP In Business Is No Longer “Dessert,” More Like “Wine”
    13/12/2012: Waiting For Customs And Trademark Reforms, EU Rights Owners Get “Proactive” Against Fakes
    11/12/2012: European Unitary Patent And Court Becomes Reality
    08/12/2012: Single European Patent Dominates IP Summit As European Parliament Vote Nears
    06/12/2012: European Commission Embarks On Process To ‘Modernise’ Copyright
    05/12/2012: Libraries, NGOs Warn EU Commissioners Against Restrictive Copyright Licensing
    05/12/2012: Survey On IP: Policymakers Believe Junk Statistics; North-South Divide Dissolving
    03/12/2012: Industry Groups Urge European Commission To Back Strong Copyright In Upcoming Debate
    03/12/2012: Special Report On Russia: Enforcement Against Online Copyright Infringement
    30/11/2012: WIPO, EPO Leaders At OECD: Adjust The Patent System For The Globalised, Knowledge-Based Society
    29/11/2012: EU Parliament To Vote On Measure Against Biopiracy; Focus On UN Protocol
    27/11/2012: Event This Week: The Creation Of Unitary Patent Protection In The European Union
    27/11/2012: European Commission, ARIPO Sign Agreement On Agricultural GIs
    20/11/2012: EU Patent, Patent Court Could Finally Be Approved In Coming Weeks
    15/11/2012: EU Parliament, Scientists Press Governments To Boost Research Funding
    13/11/2012: Proposal For EPO Staff Bonus Raises Questions
    09/11/2012: Inside Views: EU Health Cooperation — Room For Improvement
    07/11/2012: Pirate Party Rep Tells UN Meeting: “F*** You, This Is My Culture!”
    22/10/2012: Greens Call For ‘Social Contract For Digital Age’; Lessig Calls US Hopeless On Copyright Reform
    22/10/2012: Peace, Love, and Private Practice: Film Industry Lawyer Ted Shapiro To Depart MPA
    19/10/2012: Sources: European Telecom Operators’ Proposals Run Aground At WCIT
    18/10/2012: Pro-Music Re-Launched After Nine Years
    17/10/2012: In Geneva, IP And The Catholic Church Are A Match Made In Heaven
    16/10/2012: Standards-Setting Organisations Increasingly Make IPR A Priority
    15/10/2012: EU Rights Owners Blast ICT Industry For Trying To “Hijack” Copyright Levy System Talks
    12/10/2012: Russian Social Network vKontakte Held Liable For Copyright Infringement A Second Time
    07/10/2012: OECD Report Shows Rise Of Internet Services
    04/10/2012: Delay Of Pirate Parties’ WIPO Observer Status Raises Questions
    03/10/2012: CERN: Free Access To Scientific Journals In Physics In 2014
    28/09/2012: Industry Analysis: Print Sales Still In Decline; New Copyright Law Not A Solution
    28/09/2012: Latest Draft Of European Patent Court Agreement Released
    27/09/2012: Google’s Neutrality Stance Tested Yet Again In Brazil
    25/09/2012: European Creators Insist Private Copying Levy Still Relevant
    25/09/2012: Special Report: Licensing Of News Titles And Extracts – Newspapers’ Best And Last Bet?
    21/09/2012: Transparency – Still An Uphill Battle In The EU
    13/09/2012: European Parliament Passes Orphan Works Directive
    29/08/2012: Revolving Door: US Copyright General Counsel Joins Music Industry
    06/08/2012: Inside Views: Form Over Function – The ECJ Rules On Software Copyright
    03/08/2012: Divergent Approaches To Copyright Reform Emerge In Europe
    02/08/2012: In The Spirit Of Fair Play: A Primer On IP And The Olympics
    28/07/2012: Global Pharma Calls On ICANN To Act Against Online Counterfeits
    23/07/2012: European Commission Seeks Public Input On Preservation Of The Open Internet
    Your IP address is 54.235.20.17